Supremes told: Avoiding eligibility 'will destroy constitutional rule of law'

all this will finally pan out, probably right when his term is about to expire, so we will have served his 4 years regardless. Then Hillary Clinton will run as democrat since he won't be able to run again.
 
all this will finally pan out, probably right when his term is about to expire, so we will have served his 4 years regardless. Then Hillary Clinton will run as democrat since he won't be able to run again.

if he is found ineligible later, then every law he signed as president would be void.
 
Sounds too good to be true that the Supremes will do something about article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution.
 
Sounds too good to be true that the Supremes will do something about article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution.

yes, it does sound too good to be true given that they've shirked their duty for so long already.


lynn
 
if he is found ineligible later, then every law he signed as president would be void.


The Supremes ruling on the issue would be void as well since all Supreme Court decisions are issued in the name of the President. As well as all decisions issued after Jan. 20 2009. All federal appointments BHO made are void as well meaning all federal convictions after Jan 20 are illegal. Real can o' worms.

IMHO it would mean end of the Union.
 
IMHO it would mean end of the Union.

Right -
Restore constitutional rule of law, or preserve the Union.
One or the other.

For some reason, it seems like the US has come to this crossroads before.
It made the wrong choice then, and I'm certain it will make the wrong choice again.
 
we are long over due for a reset anyway......its time for the states to break the Fed Govt apart.
 
Back
Top