I'm pretty sure this is an old suggestion, but I'll say it again:
In future debates (if there is such a thing) or speeches where there any people who are hearing RP's message for the first time, change the current explanation of certain issues. When discussing things like he did at MTV regarding not financially supporting the oppressed people of Darfur, RP mentioned that it's not constitutional to steal from one group to give to another, something like that. To anyone who has already "gotten" the message, that makes perfect sense. To someone who's not used to thinking of reality in those terms, they may not understand that government has no money of its own, and any money or aid that it gives away is coming from US taxpayers. Present the same idea, but pull it back a step closer to the fundamentals, so people understand what motivates his position.
In future debates (if there is such a thing) or speeches where there any people who are hearing RP's message for the first time, change the current explanation of certain issues. When discussing things like he did at MTV regarding not financially supporting the oppressed people of Darfur, RP mentioned that it's not constitutional to steal from one group to give to another, something like that. To anyone who has already "gotten" the message, that makes perfect sense. To someone who's not used to thinking of reality in those terms, they may not understand that government has no money of its own, and any money or aid that it gives away is coming from US taxpayers. Present the same idea, but pull it back a step closer to the fundamentals, so people understand what motivates his position.