RP mention in The Economist: Iowa/Hemp

Tim724

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
346
The lastest Economist magazine has an article about Hemp in the US that mentions Ron Paul. The article suggests that he could win over Iowa farmers with his stance on legalizing hemp growing.

On a high
Jun 21st 2007 | SEATTLE
From The Economist print edition

Is weed the new green?


Sprouting soon in North Dakota“PLANS are afoot for a great expansion of the hemp industry.” So proclaimed the Department of Agriculture in its rousing 1942 movie, “Hemp for Victory”, which urged farmers to rally to the cause: “Hemp for mooring ships! Hemp for tow lines! Hemp for tackle and gear!” The plant's long, strong fibres twist easily into rope, which made it useful for parachute webbing. The war effort was imperilled when Japan's seizure of the Philippines curtailed America's supply.

But despite the enthusiasm of wartime planners, hemp never took root (as it were). Taxes and regulations, introduced in 1937 but minimally enforced during the war, kicked in again during the 1950s. Hemp is a variety of the cannabis plant, which also produces marijuana—though industrial hemp has a much smaller concentration of the mind-blowing compound, THC, than the smokable stuff. America's puritans, not to mention nylon-makers, wanted production shut down.

Nowadays farmers are banned from growing hemp without a permit from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which usually refuses to grant one. So many hemp products in America—food, lotions, clothing, paper and so forth—are imported from China or Canada, where farmers have been allowed to grow hemp commercially since 1998.


Could hemp make a comeback? America's greens have fallen for the stuff, and not just because plenty like the occasional puff. Hemp grows so easily that few pesticides or even fertilisers are needed. “Feral” hemp is said to grow by the roadside in Iowa and Nebraska. Barbara Filippone, owner of a hemp fabric company called Enviro Textiles, says demand has rocketed—sales are growing by 35% a year. Nutiva, a California-based hemp company that sells hemp bars, shakes and oils, saw sales rise from under $1m three years ago to $4.5m last year. “Hemp is the next soy,” predicts John Roulac, Nutiva's founder.

American farmers would love to grow hemp. North Dakota, which in 1999 became the first state to allow industrial hemp farming, has taken the lead. This week two farmers from the state filed a lawsuit to force the DEA to issue permits to grow hemp; the farmers had applied for permits back in February, thus far to no avail. Ron Paul, a Texas congressman and presidential candidate, could win over farmers in Iowa because of his pro-hemp lobbying. In February he introduced a bill in Congress that would allow Americans to grow it.

If hemp grows so easily, what about using the crop as a biofuel? A Mercedes-Benz “hemp car” did make its way across America six years ago. (Among other uses in cars, “Pimp My Ride”, an MTV show, recently featured a 1965 Chevy Impala that runs on biodiesel and has hemp upholstery.) Perhaps this is just the niche for Willie Nelson. He already has his own biodiesel line, called BioWillie, and is not unfamiliar with other uses of the cannabis plant.
 
Last edited:
Well, we're trying to win Iowa, and Iowa is full of farmers.....

I wonder if Dr. Paul is going to use this strategy.
 
This is a turning point - the first two times The Economist mentioned Ron Paul as a 2008 candidate they were rudely dismissive of him.

The first time they mentioned him they called him "an obscure outsider from
somewhere in Texas." ("Of Slips and Video Clips"; 03/17/2007 issue)

The second time they wrote that Ron Paul “stands no chance at all.” ("Rudy McRomney and the rest"; 05/17/07 issue)

The Economist is definately part of the statist MSM, however they typically report brewing news stories months before the rest of the media catches on. Maybe The Economist's change of tune is a pre-cursor to the rest of the MSM taking RP more seriously.
 
I STILL say, leave the "legalize hemp" signs home on Sat. The Christian group and the hemp group don't see eye-to-eye. Not yet.
 
I STILL say, leave the "legalize hemp" signs home on Sat. The Christian group and the hemp group don't see eye-to-eye. Not yet.

Yeah, I don't think a bunch of people from out-of-state holding signs with a weed leaf on them would be good for Ron Paul in Iowa.

However, the hemp statement might be ok as a footnote after talking about getting rid of handouts to big-agriculture. Probably not a good topic for a sign though - it needs to be framed and explained carefully.
 
The Economist is definately part of the statist MSM, however they typically report brewing news stories months before the rest of the media catches on. Maybe The Economist's change of tune is a pre-cursor to the rest of the MSM taking RP more seriously.

I was disappointed by previous articles by The Economist as they are meant to be a pro free market paper, however it is now it seems to be more "market with regulation".
 
Hemp is really the only biofuel crop that makes any sense.

Hemp seed oil is the only vegetable oil that can be both produced in large quantities and burned in diesels without additives and processing.

Hemp is also extremely soil friendly, one of the real problems with biofuels nobody talks about is the damage done to soils, mining carbon from topsoils to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels is foolish.

You can get biodiesel, fiber, and ethanol from the same hemp plant and a hemp crop rotated with corn is a net positive for the soil compared to current typical crop rotations.

The farmers know all this.
 
I was thinking about that. The farmers know all about hemp. But the the media would be happy to take pictures of pro-hemp signs and use them as back drops while talking about the Libertarian's positions on drugs, conveniently forgetting to mention that RP is a Republican.
 
Back
Top