Ron Paul should challenge Gingrich to Lincoln-Douglas Debate

actually better for Paul to give a "major policy" speech outlining his FP with specifics. Newt is coming out with one next week. the campaign needs to counter-that asap.
 
I think this thread should be locked and moved. let's not give anyone any ideas

Seriously? A RP supporter trying to censor another RP supporter?

I though my bulletpoints were well thought-out. I believe Newt would decline a Paul challenge. Otherwise, why would he challenge Huntsman after Romney declined? Regardless, I have faith in our Candidate to expose Newt for what he is if they were to go toe to toe.......
 
actually better for Paul to give a "major policy" speech outlining his FP with specifics. Newt is coming out with one next week. the campaign needs to counter-that asap.

I would agree with that. I think it's crucial that Paul articulate his 9/11 position. He needs to provide the source materials that verify his message that FP played a part in the planning and execution of 9/11. The die-hard RP supporters know what he means, but I think the message is lost to mainstream America......
 
"Dr. Paul held his own on the Patriot Act when debating Gingrich during the Nov 22 CNN debate. This one-on-one exchange with Gingrich gained NATIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION in the days after the CNN debate."

Actually, I'd say most would agree Ron got owned on the McVeigh thing, come on guys, we have to understand what Ron is and what he's not, and he's not a debater, he's not afraid of a debate certainly, but it is not his strong point, Gingrich, although he says a bunch of BS, it BS people love to hear and he is very quick on his feet whereas Ron need time to think about things and ends up stuttering alot, I think this would really hurt Ron personally.
 
Last edited:
What I would love to see is a Liberty debate on the 27th December to compete against Trumps rubbish. Get tons of people to tune into that instead =).
 
Why should Ron challenge Newt Gingrich of all people when he has been challenging every American in this country to rethink the role of government for the last 4 years, 30+ if you really dig in and get to know the good doctor's message.

challenging Newt to anything acts like Newt has some kind of credibility that Ron Paul wants to challenge. Newt does not. How about Ron Paul challenge Mitt Romney to a one on one debate?

That would be the debate that will really show the contrast between Conservative principles and liberal biases.
 
"Dr. Paul held his own on the Patriot Act when debating Gingrich during the Nov 22 CNN debate. This one-on-one exchange with Gingrich gained NATIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION in the days after the CNN debate."

Actually, I'd say most would agree Ron got owned on the McVeigh thing, come on guys, we have to understand what Ron is and what he's not, and he's not a debater, he's not afraid of a debate certainly, but it is not his strong point, Gingrich, although he says a bunch of BS, it BS people love to hear and he is very quick on his feet whereas Ron need time to think about things and ends up stuttering alot, I think this would really hurt Ron personally.

It was unfortunate that RCP cut off the videotape after Newt's response and willfully omitted Ron's counter-response. Not many heard the part about having a police state, which is something I'm sure Newt would approve of.
 
Last edited:
Paul needs to be challenging Newt any chance he gets to expose his crony ideas even further. Great Idea
 
It was unfortunate that RCP cut off the videotape after Newt's response and willfully omitted Ron's counter-response. Not many heard the part about having a police state, which is something I'm sure Newt would approve of.

Exactly! "You can prevent crimes by becoming a Police State. So if you advocate the Police State............the crime then will be against the American People and against Our Freedoms. And we will throw out so much of what Our Revolution was fought for." - Ron Paul, Nov. 22, 2011
 
People complain about air time, yet this would be a great chance to get some. You can't have it both ways.

Let the Campaign know. Feel free to use my bulletpoints posted at the beginning of the thread.

Paul needs to be challenging Newt any chance he gets to expose his crony ideas even further. Great Idea

Let the Campaign know. Feel free to use my bulletpoints posted at the beginning of the thread. I emailed and called the Campaign with this tactical recommendation, but one voice isn't going to influence the Campaign Mgmt, Jesse Benton and John Tate.
 
Back
Top