turbobrain9
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 152
actually better for Paul to give a "major policy" speech outlining his FP with specifics. Newt is coming out with one next week. the campaign needs to counter-that asap.
I think this thread should be locked and moved. let's not give anyone any ideas
actually better for Paul to give a "major policy" speech outlining his FP with specifics. Newt is coming out with one next week. the campaign needs to counter-that asap.
"Dr. Paul held his own on the Patriot Act when debating Gingrich during the Nov 22 CNN debate. This one-on-one exchange with Gingrich gained NATIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION in the days after the CNN debate."
Actually, I'd say most would agree Ron got owned on the McVeigh thing, come on guys, we have to understand what Ron is and what he's not, and he's not a debater, he's not afraid of a debate certainly, but it is not his strong point, Gingrich, although he says a bunch of BS, it BS people love to hear and he is very quick on his feet whereas Ron need time to think about things and ends up stuttering alot, I think this would really hurt Ron personally.
It was unfortunate that RCP cut off the videotape after Newt's response and willfully omitted Ron's counter-response. Not many heard the part about having a police state, which is something I'm sure Newt would approve of.
People complain about air time, yet this would be a great chance to get some. You can't have it both ways.
Paul needs to be challenging Newt any chance he gets to expose his crony ideas even further. Great Idea