Ron Paul Institute : Trump Hires Neocon Slayer (Col. Macgregor)

eleganz

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
8,262
Col. Macgregor is, full disclosure, a cherished friend of your author. He spoke at Dr. Paul's Congressional Liberty Lunches and no doubt had great influence on Republican Members who were skeptical of endless war but also cautious over sounding too peacenik. Macgregor embodies the idea of a muscular defense of the United States that rejects the siren song of the neocons and globalists.

We are grateful that Col. Macgregor has spoken at two Ron Paul Institute conferences. Each time he outlined what would have been a highly successful Trump foreign policy. What an historic tragedy that Trump only paid attention to this far too late. Unless...


http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...ovember/11/trump-finally-hires-neocon-slayer/






From a anti-war twitter user I follow, who has been very vocal of Trump, Obama, Bush, etc...

 
Last edited:
Could be Trump's payback for this development from couple of days ago:

The Zionists are helping with the coup effort, Trump will remember their treachery.

AMLO even refuses to congratulate Biden yet.

If ss's assessment is right, could be big trouble ahead for deep neocons/ziocons who have been pushing US into wars for interests of foreign-firster parasitic loobies.

Part of this generous soft touch ahead of inevitable farewell could be 'Republicans psychology management'.


Kind of too late, isn't it?

Yes it is. But from 'follow the money' standpoint, during regular term when was relying on ZOA funder globalist neocon top donor's funding, he had to go with more expereinced and tested appointees like following.
Also would be interesting to see how neocons tool 'Lyin Ted' responds to this latest appointment.

Trump praises Bolton
by Steven Nelson
| May 09, 2019 01:24 PM
President Trump on Thursday indicated that talk he is growing frustrated with national security adviser John Bolton is untrue, describing his famously hawkish aide as giving him "good advice."
"John is very good. He has strong views on things but that's okay," Trump told reporters at the White House.
Special-Features-Bolton-Declares-article-picture-6-INSTRUCTIONS-CROP-OUT-THE-PIC-OF-THE-MAN-ON-THE-FAR-RIGHT-IN-PHOTO_edited.jpg


Saf1xWt.jpg
 
Last edited:
Trump learned about Ron Paul in 2012..

Trump is not stupid.

I am pretty sure Trump got a taste of the red pill... but knew that it is useless to fight directly.. look at the fraud.
 
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...ovember/11/trump-finally-hires-neocon-slayer/


From a anti-war twitter user I follow, who has been very vocal of Trump, Obama, Bush, etc...


Indeed , that is the reason 200 WARMONGER Generals support Biden. Criminal War Criminal John Bolton effectuated numerous FALSE FLAGS against Iran but President Trump refused to attack Iran or Syria. Reason he was declared a threat to national security.

Hillary Clinton emails released by wikileaks in the summer of 2016 showed that the Demo Rats were willing to start WW3 in order to help Israel expand its borders into Syria.
 
Does it even matter? Trump's appointees leave in 2 months.

Well if Trump is going to leave AF by Christmas as he said he would do, then yes it does matter.

The earliest we will know if Trump is leaving, is mid-December. As of now this election is not certified and Trump has a path to victory. I'd explain it but it just goes over most peoples heads here. You can find it in my previous posts.
 
Well if Trump is going to leave AF by Christmas as he said he would do, then yes it does matter.

The earliest we will know if Trump is leaving, is mid-December. As of now this election is not certified and Trump has a path to victory. I'd explain it but it just goes over most peoples heads here. You can find it in my previous posts.
I'd be willing to bet most of us on this forum know what Trumps path to victory would be. It's called over turning vote fraud.

How about you stop insulting the intelligence of people on this forum. As a group, we get things.
 
I'd be willing to bet most of us on this forum know what Trumps path to victory would be. It's called over turning vote fraud.

How about you stop insulting the intelligence of people on this forum. As a group, we get things.

That's one path... overturning vote fraud through the courts.

Another path is through the state legislatures. All the state legislatures in the swing states Trump needs are Republican. Would need to convince them that the state election laws were broken, massive voter fraud occurred and the courts failed in upholding the election laws. They choose a Trump elector.

The other path would be tying up the state legislatures so they don't certify the results, and Biden doesn't reach the 270 threshold. In that case, it goes back to the House, and each state gets one vote, Trump wins. The Democrats will take that to the Supreme Court to be overturned, but good luck with all that..

If that process goes beyond the Jan. 20 inauguration date, then Pelosi becomes President temporarily.
 
I'd be willing to bet most of us on this forum know what Trumps path to victory would be. It's called over turning vote fraud.

How about you stop insulting the intelligence of people on this forum. As a group, we get things.

If you feel insulted, that would be your problem and not mine as I did not mention you and frankly don't know who you are. You just felt obligated to be offended by me, which is odd.
 
If you feel insulted, that would be your problem and not mine as I did not mention you and frankly don't know who you are. You just felt obligated to be offended by me, which is odd.
It isn't about me. That's twice now you've made things up. What is odd is that you don't think most of us get it. How's the air up there on your high horse?
 
It isn't about me. That's twice now you've made things up. What is odd is that you don't think most of us get it. How's the air up there on your high horse?

So now you've clarified that you're not speaking for yourself but you keep saying "us". Hopefully you see the failed logic there.

Now, who are you speaking for exactly? The people who don't get it? If they don't get it, then yes my statement is meant for them. And how was that wrong?
 
So now you've clarified that you're not speaking for yourself but you keep saying "us". Hopefully you see the failed logic there.

Now, who are you speaking for exactly? The people who don't get it? If they don't get it, then yes my statement is meant for them. And how was that wrong?

I wouldn't worry too much about this character or any of the others who want to give money to obvious conmen.

@tebowlives
 
Back
Top