Ron Paul Criticizes Boston Lockdown: 'We Had Martial Law Out There,' 'It's Criminal'

Calling all bootlicker apologists?

What say you?

Not me. I called it (martial Law) before it even happened. But yes. Was rather disapointed in some of the discussion when this was first happening that night. But in retrospect I think it serves to really understand who and what you're dealing with. One second you think folks are against this sort of thing and then all of a sudden they want the military policing the streets.

I'd still ike to know the outcome of the man who was forced to undress and then be paraded nude in front of world news. That's a problem because now people think it's acceptable.
 
Last edited:
And that is why I am a RON Paul supporter.

That man is a national treasure.

For what it's worth I think you're the only one who has it right on the drone speak. At least that I've read. The discussion has just slipped right on by the main issue and now we see dolts arguing about cops and robbers and whatnot. This places the notion that it's assumed that it's ok for the things to remain permanantly stationary/present/patrolling the air.

I want to hear my representatives position on the science of it. That's how you'll get to the bottom of it and force the issue to be discussed properly. To continue to fall back on the old google/business model spew regarding these technologies and IP and the lot only clouds minds and enforces the idea of asking the wrong questions. They want to approach it from a domestic business perspective but are quick to disregard the business of war (Of course, now America is conveniently a warzone if you listen to the politicians who are heavily lobbied by the complex). It's boomin.
 
Last edited:
Exactly!

And that is a notion I reject out of hand.

One that I imagine Ron rejects out of hand as well.

Thanks, and +rep

For what it's worth I think you're the only one who has it right on the drone speak. At least that I've read. The discussion has just slipped right on by the main issue and now we see dolts arguing about cops and robbers and whatnot. This places the notion that it's assumed that it's ok for the things to remain permanantly stationary/present/patrolling the air.
I want to hear my representatives position on the science of it. That's how you'll get to the bottom of it and force the issue to be discussed properly.
 
And that is why I am a RON Paul supporter.

That man is a national treasure.

You always have to make this a fight between Ron and Rand, don't you? Damn. It's getting pretty old, AF.

Neither of them are pro-drone.
 
Last edited:
You always have to make this a fight between Ron and Rand, don't you? Damn. It's getting pretty old, AF.

Neither of them are pro-drone.

Ron is not pro-drone. Rand has not in any way shape or form made that abundantly clear from his rhetoric. The filibuster was great. He made it perfectly clear about the use against Americans on our soil. People's need for Rand to be Ron is what is fueling this argument. Calling anyone who questions anything Rand says a "Rand hater" is certainly not helping. NO ONE has stated they hate Rand. They have voiced disappointment in some of his rhetoric and actions. This isn't hate. And attacking them for not acting like he's exactly like Ron on every issue is just stupid. Remove the familial relationship for one minute, then ask yourselves, "would I be giving anyone else a pass on some of this stuff?" I think the honest answer is no.
 
"That man is a national treasure."

LOL...When he passes we must dip him in gold...He must be gold plated....Tear down the statue of liberty and place him there instead...
 
Back
Top