- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,466
While it is true that supporters enjoy a bit of mutual outrage at hit pieces in the media, is it really necessary to expand upon them?
In the case below, someone at Reason decided that an inflammatory headline would be a good idea. Now if the purpose was to refute the neoconservative hit piece, that would be one thing. But it appears that the purpose was just to highlight the hit piece, and to agree with with it.
Rand Paul: Thin-Skinned, Flip-Flopping, Question-Dodging Candidate?
In the case below, someone at Reason decided that an inflammatory headline would be a good idea. Now if the purpose was to refute the neoconservative hit piece, that would be one thing. But it appears that the purpose was just to highlight the hit piece, and to agree with with it.
Rand Paul: Thin-Skinned, Flip-Flopping, Question-Dodging Candidate?