RE: Calls for Anti-II Amendment Legislation, Guns & Ammo, and Internet Bans

Weston White

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
4,956
RE: Calls for Anti-II Amendment Legislation, Guns & Ammo, and Internet Bans

In light of everything of late that is seamlessly moving forward at full-throttle, I have been thinking that those of us in the “pro-for” mindset really need to start kicking back at the myriad of doors now besetting us. That being said, I thought it would be highly apropos, at least for those of us that are interested, to begin drafting serious teeth-biting bills that could be sponsored and introduced into Congress (further noting, that I am not knowledgeable on how the whole bill approval process actually functions, what rules are involved, etc.)

Though, as a starting point, we could work on perfecting whatever bills, with each of us adjusting them to our own liking and then once completed, submitting each one to our own representative for their sponsorship, while including an introductory cover letter for their further consideration.

Furthermore, those of us that are actually planning on submitting the final result to their own representative could post their representative’s name and district information (i.e., within this thread) so as permit others to mention carbon-copy (Cc:) within their own cover letters, which I would tend to think will better aid in making a stronger case for whatever proposal to ultimately be supported. As well as, to also hopefully pickup cosponsors along the way; while at the very least such proactiveness just might actually serve as a bit of a wakeup call for our apparently self-serving representatives.

And perhaps contact could be established with politically established gun advocate and lobbyist groups.

Thank you.
 
BILL PROPOSAL VERSION: 0.8-FINAL

Download RIDAPA.DOC


COVER LETTER


Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing with great concern over the present unrelenting push towards establishing irrevocable “gun control”, for such having been set into motion, merely to pretense the further stripping away of immutable rights that are inherent in all Americans, rights so intended to justly aid one’s own protective defenses, whatever the circumstance. Very obviously, there is an unrepentant agenda, steeped in palliated Hegelianism being worked, and covertly so, all by the coordinated, loathing, and bitterly unconstitutional demands of such omnipresent entities as the United Nations and its encroaching provocateurs.

Crystallized, is that the truthful intent of our Bill of Rights is to protect the citizenry of our United States of America from all forms of abuse and methods of governmental despotism. Ergo, if the rightful breadth of our II Amendment was only intended to address the matter of an individual’s right to hunt, participate in organized sharpshooter events, or to otherwise afford them protection only during home invasions, then the entirety of this issue would have never been recognized as part of our Nation’s core fundaments; instead it would have been left entirely to the individual states to address. However, with that being stated, there is also no reason, why its rightful context does not consider all foregoing aspects, be it as a means of: last resort protection from abuse or negligence wrought through public enforcement actions; hunting for survival or sustenance; exhibition, hobby, or sport; personal safety, necessity, or defense; etc.

The Congress has been supremely tasked with upholding, that is to say, with revering America’s fundamental law and not whatsoever with relinquishing it. For contained within those very maxims, remaining so fixed and unchanging are such spirited truths as were originally realized thousands, hundreds, and again 236-years ago (1776) through to this very day. Such righteousness is inspired to invigorate; and monumentally, it is for our Executive, Legislative, and Judicial too collectively sustain them with fervency –even at the cost of one’s own politic stratagem or favor.

In closing, I kindly, as by your affirmation in public office, remind you of our U.S. Constitution, Article VI,C.2: “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Thank you for all of you and your staff’s effort and consideration in addressing these most pressing of matters.

Sincerely,


[FN]​


INTRODUCTORY WISDOM


Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
– James Madison (Federalist Paper No. 46, Para. 8)

... I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If that paper [U.S. Constitution] on the table gets no alteration, the militia of the future day may not consist of all classes, high and low, and rich and poor; but may be confined to the lower and middle classes of the people, granting exclusion to the higher classes of the people. If we should ever see that day, the most ignominious punishments and heavy fines may be expected. Under the present government all ranks of people are subject to militia duty.
– George Mason IV (Elliot’s Debates, Vol. 3, Virginia, June 16, 1788)

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.
– Samuel Adams (Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, pg. 86-87)

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. . . . The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo.
– Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Paper No. 28, Para. 6)

Laws that forbid the carrying of arms . . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
– Thomas Jefferson (In quoting Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria within his Commonplace Book.)


Right to Individual Defensive Arms & Protection Act (RIDAPA)


A BILL WORTHY OF CONGRESSIONAL SPONSORSHIP


WHEREAS, a myriad of states, cities, counties, and townships throughout the United States of America have made it a criminal act to conceal carry a firearm (CCW) or otherwise open carry a firearm while out and about in public;

WHEREAS, a myriad of states, cities, counties, and townships throughout the United States of America have otherwise mandated an approval process for conceal carrying a firearm that is largely feeble and arbitrary, requiring justification as by a submitted reasonable cause letter;

WHEREAS, it is an immutable and fundamental right, while also a personal duty and civil privilege, for individuals to protect themselves, their families, and others from the impending harm sought by others with corrupted, evil, or nefarious, agendas, intentions, or motivations;

WHEREAS, a primary concern leading up to our American Revolution involved British Redcoats demanding, as by their Parliament’s several “Intolerable”/“Coercive” Acts, that American colonists, i.e., their militias, surrender over to them all firearms, which ultimately precipitated the Battles of Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts during the Spring of 1775 (April);

WHEREAS, the intellectual and jurist Forebearers of the United States of America had wisely instilled fixed, solidly unchanging maxims within America’s principal documents for which have and will always remain endued by empirical veracities;

WHEREAS, America’s common law has well established that it is for the duty of each and every individual to defend and protect themselves from all degrees and forms of danger, harm, threat, and wrongdoing; that law enforcement personnel and other such first responders are themselves under no legal obligation to provide any individual with a guarantee of absolute protection;

WHEREAS, II Amendment to the United States of America’ Bill of Rights serves as an impetus for the several states of the Union, being so necessary and proper for maintaining a strong and effective militia, for which consists entirely of the mindful and loyal citizenry thereof to tenably combat against both domestic violence and repel foreign invasion;

WHEREAS, acts of terrorism, gang violence, drug violence, mental illness that including drug, prescription, and substance abuse, have long become established as a national epidemic or are otherwise prevalently rampant, having resulted in a grave moral danger toward upholding civility and peacefulness throughout America, and effectively blockading the future of its social infrastructure and wellbeing;

WHEREAS, in the course of the last century, respectively, 170,000,000 unarmed or otherwise disarmed individuals, have had their lives taken from them, by the authoritative nature of their own tyrannous system of government, while certainly America’s system of government is itself not immune to such acts of blatantly unremorseful atrociousness;

WHEREAS, all systems of government are comprised of both men and women, who, during the course of serving as affirmed civil servants unto the public are themselves prone to fallibilities and such other absurdness, fatuousness, and misjudgment;

WHEREAS, historically, it has been earnestly shown that both armed law abiding and responsible individuals are fully capable of ceasing, thwarting, or otherwise fending off the violent whims of armed attackers;

WHEREAS, it is beyond all reasonableness to expect for law enforcement personnel alone to quell the epidemic of criminality, harassment, harm, threat, and violence that is wrought daily by organized criminals, drug traffickers, gang members, terrorists, abusers, and the like, while the average response time for law enforcement personnel is more than six-minutes and the average duration for an act of criminality to play itself out is approximately less than two-minutes;

WHEREAS, the bona fide solution for preventing the continuing trend of mass public shootings is to both ensure and preserve the individual right to keep and bear defensive arms and personal protection and not to constrain, repress, or to otherwise criminalize such core and requisite American fundaments;

WHEREFORE, WE THE PEOPLE, now seek meaningful remedy and public redress as by the esteemed and spirited affirmations bestowed within our elected representatives in Congress so as to effect through America’s great Charter, the Declaration of Independence and wherein manifestly securing our unalienable rights, among which consist of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”; we furthermore and respectfully, demand that the below numerations 1-12, in whole, be enacted into public law:

1. By this act of public law, it is intended to mandate a national standard of conceal carry firearms (CCW), entailing the following for state-by-state compliance to the same:
(i) confidential clearance of national (including: NCIC and INTERPOL) and in-state law enforcement database wants, warrants, court orders, and criminal history and affiliations of petitioner;
(ii) confidential national and in-state registry clearance and national database registration of all firearms to be concealed and carried by petitioner;
(iii) satisfactory completion of a gun safety course presented by a certified firearms instructor or range-master, or by law enforcement personnel, such course shall consist of between 4-8 hours in duration and require upon completion that the petitioner display a reasonable degree of knowledge in proper firearms shooting safety and overall responsibility in handling, stowing, targeting, firing, breeching, clearing, cleaning, repairing, and securing their firearms to be concealed and carried, as well as general knowledge pertinent to firearms statutes and torts, and the purchasing, selling, or transferring of firearms;
(iv) satisfactory completion of an in-state firearms responsibility, safety, and statutes test consisting of between 15-30 questions, such test will consist of inquires based in the context of only state gun laws as pertaining to proper handling, firing, transporting, stowing, maintaining, transferring, etc., of firearms in a variety of situations and will be administered by a certified firearms instructor or range-master, or by law enforcement personnel;
(v) an in-state verified affidavit is to be completed by petitioner, therein attesting the petitioner’s true identity, and that they fully understand and appreciate the responsibility of conceal carrying their loaded firearm, and therein fully disclosing any and all qualifying mental illnesses they suffer from or are later determined to suffer from, and of any and all substance abuse and prescription dependencies that they have or are later determined to have, this affidavit will also consist of a generalized test of between 15-30 questions pertaining solely to mental health, ethics, cause and effect, and logic inquires;
(vi) petitioners shall pay a reasonable fee for the entirety of the registration process and the expenses incurred for in-state provided documents and review, recertification fees are to be set at a reasonably lower sum than for the initial one-time certification fees;
(vii) concealed carry permits are to be made copy and forge resistant and are to appear uniformly similar as to in-state individual identification cards, displaying the petitioner’s photo, current address, full legal name and date of birth, will cross-reference their identification or driver’s license number (as applicable), and will display the complete make, model, caliber, primary colors, and serial number of all authorized firearms to be concealed and carried by the petitioner;
(viii) reasonableness in timeframes for the reapplication of conceal carry due to failing to meet the requirements for the initial approval process will be at the discretion of individual states so far as the timeframe is between 2 to 6 months, while revoking of conceal carry due to abuse, court orders, unlawful acts, etc., will be so far between a timeframe of 6-months to 2-years before reapplication may again be permitted, while generally, court orders will place the status of conceal carry into a state of suspension until such orders have been revoked or expired;
(ix) conceal carry registrations will be reoccurring at the preference of individual states so far as the timeframe is between 2 to 4 years, whereas only the following above numerations will require consideration for redoing: i, ii, iv, vi, and vii (as necessary).

2. By this act of public law, it is intended to mandate a national standard for open carry that is less stringent than are the requirements to conceal carry. And that it be legislatively decreed that the ability of the individual to sustain all just means of personal defense is a most virtuous and tenable right in ensuring that social order and safety is both maintained and respected; and that such humane necessities are not to be avoided or made malleable through governmental discretion.
(i) Generally, any individual that is lawfully permitted to purchase and possess firearms is to also be lawfully permitted to carry such firearms in plain open view upon their person while traversing in public.
(ii) The term plain open view is to mean that a portion of a properly holstered firearm is to remain visible so that a reasonable individual would be readily able to identify the holstered firearm for what it is.
(iii) The term traversing in public includes by foot, automobiles and other such motorized or mechanized devices, horseback, and all similar means of public or private ground transportation.

3. By this act of public law, it is intended to redefine the present definitions of assault weapon and assault rifle to correctly mean any firearm that is capable as by the intended design of the weapon manufacturer to function as a fully automatic firing weapon or (and also) that is capable of launching mortar rounds, fragmentation or concussion grenades, and similar type proximity projectiles, and is to exclude firearms solely because of its intimidating appearance, appeal, caliber, color scheme, design material, functional performance, look, magazine ammunition capacity, or size, with exception only to:
(i) such meaning shall further include long-rifles capable of being broken-down into components, or folded, or retracted, to one-quarter (1/4) of its original size, so as to be made concealable, and;
(ii) such meaning shall further include all weaponry capable of properly discharging cartridges larger than 7.62mm magnum.

4. By this act of public law, it is intended to redefine the definition of open carry so as to permit the storage of magazines loaded with ammunition rounds within the firearm, while the breech or chamber itself remains devoid of ammunition; to additionally permit storage of firearms in the rearward reload-ready position when so secured in a specially designed holster (provided that the holster will, while the firearm is holstered, prevent the slide from self-releasing forward and breeching or chambering a new round of ammunition); to keep spare magazines, and other such respective firearm accessories concealed on or about the individual; and to furthermore clarify, that consequently open carry firearms may be covered by articles of clothing as relevant to local weather conditions, be it cool, frosty, snowy, rainy, windy, etc.

5. By this act of public law, it is intended to require all public buildings and private businesses prohibiting the possession of firearms within the interior of such buildings or premises, be it by conceal carry or open carry, to provide for the free use by individuals possessing firearms, ready access to secure lockable safes for which to place and retrieve their firearms at their convenience.

6. By this act of public law, it is intended that no part of this act serve to conflict or nullify the statutes or codes of any state that pertains to bona fide criminal activities or intentions involving the possession or usage of firearms, health and safety violations involving the possession or usage of firearms, mental health issues involving the possession or usage firearms, etc.
(i) Furthermore, it is intended that no state shall deny any individual their right to conceal carry, open carry, or keep and bear arms on any matter of concern that pertains solely to such individual’s appearance, creed, education, ethnic group, gender, marital status, physical disabilities, social class, and the like.

7. By this act of public law, it is intended to hereafter provide for a proper means of governmental accountability, by mandating that all public law enforcement department issued, official usage and duty weaponry, be registered into a national firearms database, including data pertaining to ballistics; furthermore, registration updating will be required for the same, whenever a ballistics marker upon such public official use firearms have been modified, refurbished, or replaced.
(i) Additionally, such requirements, as the above, shall be held applicable to all armed professional: bail bond agents, bodyguards, private investigators, private security, security contractors, trackers, transportation security, and the like, who are intended to perform any portion of their regular duties, functions, operations, tasks, or travels within locales that are normally accessible by the general public.

8. By this act of public law, it is intended that all firearms, regardless if in possession by conceal carry or open carry, are to be kept properly stowed in a well designed holster that: (A) fully protects the trigger area of the firearm from being accidentally or unintentionally discharged and (B) has at least one level of safety incorporated into the holster preventing the firearm from sliding out unintentionally or being removed without first unsnapping or unlatching a restraint.
(i) In cases of open carry, when using a waist holster, it must be equipped with a belt restraint (i.e., one or more belt loops) and an adequate belt must be worn along with the waist holster; for with which the waist holster is to be properly fastened onto the belt.
(ii) In cases of open carry, the holstered firearm may be positioned around the waist at the preference of the individual; and open carry holster configurations shall additionally include both inside the waistband (provided that the handle and hammer area of the firearm remain fully visible, with exception to weather conditions), thigh holsters, tactical vests and rigs equipped with a chest, shoulder, or stomach holster, and bandolero, sling, and shoulder holster rigs (provided that the holster rig is secured around both shoulders by a one or more continuous pieces of adequate material that is not dependent on press or pull snaps, buttons, or clips around the shoulder, back, or chest areas).
(iii) In cases of both conceal carry and open carry, the restraint securing the gun into the holster must be functioning properly and actually connected or fastened; save for instances when the holstered firearm is properly intended for immediate or imminent use.

9. By this act of public law, it is intended that individual states may legislate immediate notification standards upon initial contact with law enforcement personnel of an individual’s conceal carry and open carry status; that conceal carry identification cards be carried and presented; and that access to an individual’s conceal carry or open carry firearm be permitted at the request of law enforcement personnel for reasonable inspection or verification.

10. By this act of public law, it is intended that for all means of public air travel, while within a designated air terminal area or onboard a publicly accessible aircraft, all individuals that are either conceal carrying or open carrying firearms will be required to fully unload and stored away their firearms into a lockbox type object that will remain inside of an article of lockable luggage throughout the duration of the flight or while remaining inside any designated air terminal area; with exception only to law enforcement personnel and other such professionals who are working in an official capacity or are otherwise “on duty”.
(i) The term lockbox type object means a solidly constructed portable object consisting of various iron compounds and with enough room internally to store all respective firearms and related equipment that can be readily secured by lock and key, combination code, or biometrics.
(ii) With consideration to this numeration, all individuals shall inherently retain the right to use just and reasonable force, including the use of their locked away devices or weapons, when in defense of themselves or the public, within any designated air terminal area or onboard any public aircraft.

11. By this act of public law, it is intended that no state may enact any public law with respect to the following and that all such current laws are preemptively null and void that makes it a crime for any juvenile, or any individual otherwise considered to be below the age of majority, to possess or use a firearm against another, or thereby the juvenile’s parents, or otherwise the owners of a firearm that is used by a juvenile or such other individual, when done so in the just and reasonable defense and wellbeing of themselves or others.
* Additionally, within the established breadth of this numeration, it may be determined prudent to further extend its rightful context, so as to additionally grant a necessary means of exclusionary firearms protection to individuals that are otherwise not legally permitted the right of firearms ownership, possession, or usage in such circumstances as aforementioned.

12. By this act of public law, it is intended that during incidents involving any declared state of emergency or martial law, domestic violence or foreign invasion, the states shall individually reserve powers respective to circumventing, omitting, or suspending any or all stipulations or restrictions as pertaining to the requirements herein established for the conceal and open carrying of firearms; regardless, such respective powers are not to be exercised by any state, whatsoever, in prevention of individuals being otherwise entitled such immutable rights to conceal carry, open carry, or to keep and bear arms.


END


RESPECTIVE COMMON LAW CITATIONS
  • Federalist Paper No. 46, Para. 8;
  • Federalist Paper No. 78, Para. 15;
  • Federalist Paper No. 83, Para. 7;
  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 176-177 (1803);
  • New Orleans v. United States, 35 U.S. 10 Pet. 662, 736 (1836);
  • Loan Association v. Topeka, 87 U.S. 655, 662-664 (1874);
  • Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1886), REAFFIRMED in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 88 (1906);
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886);
  • Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 442 (1886);
  • Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U. S. 258, 267 (1890), REAFFIRMED in Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 14, 17-18 (1957);
  • Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189, 206 (1920);
  • Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478-479 (1928);
  • Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co., 295 U.S. 330, 346-347 (1935);
  • United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 62-63 (1936);
  • West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943);
  • Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 128 (1970), REAFFIRMED in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 518-519 (1997);
  • United Nation’s Charter, A.2,S.7: “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.”;
  • UNESCO Constitution, A.I.1 (Purposes and functions): “The purpose of the Organization is to contribute to peace and security by promoting collaboration among the nations through education, science and culture in order to further universal respect for justice, for the rule of law and for the human rights and fundamental freedoms which are affirmed for the peoples of the world, without distinction of race, sex, language or religion, by the Charter of the United Nations.”;
  • Et al;
 
Last edited:
WTF?

1. By this act of public law, it is intended to mandate a national standard of conceal carry firearms (CCW), entailing the following for state-by-state compliance to the same:

(i) confidential clearance of national (including: NCIC and INTERPOL) and in-state law enforcement database wants, warrants, court orders, and criminal history and affiliations of petitioner;
(ii) confidential national and in-state registry clearance and national database registration of all firearms to be concealed and carried by petitioner;
(iii) satisfactory completion of a gun safety course presented by a certified firearms instructor, range-master, or by law enforcement personnel, such course will consist of between 4-8 hours in duration and require upon completion that the petitioner display a reasonable knowledge in proper firearms shooting safety and overall responsibly in handling, stowing, targeting, firing, breeching, clearing, cleaning, repairing, and securing their firearms to be concealed and carried, as well as general knowledge as to statutory firearms laws and torts, and the purchasing, selling, or transferring of firearms;
(iv) satisfactory completion of an in-state firearm statutes, responsibility, and safety test consisting of between 15-30 questions, such test will consist of questions based in the context of only state gun laws as pertaining to proper handling, firing, transporting, stowing, maintaining, transferring, etc., of firearms in a variety of situations and will be administered by a certified firearms instructor, range-master, or by law enforcement personnel;
(v) an in-state verified affidavit is to be completed by petitioner, therein attesting the petitioner’s true identity, and that they fully understand and appreciate the responsibly of conceal carrying their loaded firearm, and therein fully disclosing any and all mental illnesses they suffer from or are later determined to suffer from, and of any and all substance abuse and prescription dependencies that they have or are later determined to have, this affidavit will also consist of a test of between 15-30 questions pertaining solely to mental health, ethics, and logic questioning;
(vi) petitioners will pay a reasonable fee for the entirety of the registration process and the expenses incurred for in-state provided documents, recertification fees are to be set at a reasonably lower sum than for the initial one-time certification fees;
(vii) concealed carry permits are to be made copy and forge resistant and are to appear uniformly similar as to in-state individual identification cards, displaying the petitioner’s photo, current address, full legal name and date of birth, will cross-reference their identification or driver’s license number (as applicable), and will display the complete make, model, caliber, primary colors, and serial number of all authorized firearms to be concealed and carried by the petitioner;
(viii) timeframes for the reapplication of conceal carry due to failing to meet the requirements for the initial approval process will be at the discretion of individual states so far as the timeframe is between 2 to 6 months, while revoking of conceal carry due to abuse, court orders, unlawful acts, etc., will be so far between a timeframe of 6-months to 2-years before reapplication may again be permitted, while generally, court orders will place the status of conceal carry into a state of suspension until such orders have been revoked or expired;
(ix) conceal carry registrations will be reoccurring at the preference of individual states so far as the timeframe is between 2 to 4 years, whereas only the following above numerations will require consideration for redoing: i, ii, iv, vi, and vii (as necessary).

How about,,

Shall not be infringed
 
WTF?

How about,,

Shall not be infringed

Surely, you realize that a reasonable compromise must be permitted for on both sides, concessions if you will; for there are such things to be considered in civility, such as the mentally ill, people that have domestic abuse orders involving weapons or terroristic threats, terrorists and subversives, etc. Presently, there are about one-half-a-dozen bills pending in Congress to further cede individual's the right to keep, bear, and purchase arms and ammunition. You have to respect what this ultimately represents.
 
(ii) In cases of open carry the holstered firearm may be positioned around the waist at the preference of the individual; and open carry holster configurations may include both inside the waistband (provided that the handle and hammer area of the firearm remains fully visible, with exception to weather conditions) and shoulder holster rigs (provided that the holster rig is secured around both shoulders by a one or more continuous pieces of material that is not dependant on press or pull snaps, buttons, or clips around the shoulder, back, or chest areas).
(iii) In cases of both conceal carry and open carry the restraint securing the gun into the holster must be functioning and actually connected or fastened, save for when the firearm is intended for immediate or imminent use.

I really don't like to carry in or on my waistband. I prefer a thigh holster,,or shoulder rig.

how about,,
Shall Not Be infringed
 
(i) In cases of open carry when using a waist holster, it must be equipped with a belt restraint (i.e., one or more belt loops) and an adequate belt must be worn along with the waist holster, with the holster being fastened onto the belt.

Though i usually wear a belt, many people do not,,and some for valid medical reasons,, others merely for comfort.

How about
Shall Not Be Infringed
 
Surely, you realize that a reasonable compromise must be permitted for on both sides,
NO, I don't.

There has never been any reasonable compromise when enacting these UN-Constitutional Laws in the first place.

Repeal the GCA of 1934,, in entirety,, and any and all laws subsequent to it.

Allow reasonable common sense and personal preference of citizens regarding when where and how they wish to exercise their rights.
 
I really don't like to carry in or on my waistband. I prefer a thigh holster,,or shoulder rig.

how about,,
Shall Not Be infringed

Oh good suggestion, I had not considered that, and also tactical vests equipped with holsters.
 
Though i usually wear a belt, many people do not,,and some for valid medical reasons,, others merely for comfort.

How about
Shall Not Be Infringed

How about sending this message to Congress.

The first federal law regulating firearms was passed in 1927 (18 USC 1715)The Mailing of Firearms Act.

The law banned the mailing of any firearm other than a shotgun or rifle through the U.S. Postal Service, except for firearms shipped for official law enforcement purposes. This law was intended to curb the mail-order business in handguns, and it is still in effect.

The purpose of this legislation was to prevent the shipping of any revolver, pistol, or other firearm that is capable of being concealed using the US Postal Service. This legislation had little effect as there were several private carriers that were legal alternatives. All the legislation really accomplished is to prevent the Post Office from getting revenue from these transfers.

The penalty for breaking this act is a $10,000 fine, 2 years imprisonment, or both.

I urge you to stand up to gun control advocates and introduce bills to repeal federal gun control laws starting with the first federal gun control law The Mailing of Firearms Act.
 
Oh good suggestion, I had not considered that, and also tactical vests equipped with holsters.

Had not thought of a "Tactical Rig".. But a Shoulder rig is nice for a back up while hunting,, or working.
even when concealment is not the issue.

These are all things that should be left to personal choice and not mandated by laws.
 
Last edited:
WHEREAS, acts of terrorism, gang violence, drug violence, mental illness that including drug, prescription, and substance abuse, have long become established as a national epidemic;

This should also be removed as Irrelevant , Inaccurate, and prejudicial.
And completely unnecessary to the discussion.
 
It's getting to the point where I can't even keep up with all the crap they're trying to get by us.

So far as I know they aren't trying to quarter soldiers in anyone's home (if only because the soldiers are still being stuffed into the meat grinder in Godknowswherezistan), so I guess there's still one amendment in the Bill of Rights that they haven't eviscerated yet...
 
Last edited:
BILL PROPOSAL VERSION: 0.1

This is pure garbage. Statist tripe.

Boo.

Hiss.

Burn the witch.

Here is your fucking law:

Sec. I

All laws restricting any weaponry of any sort is hereby repealed in toto and for all time.

Sec. II

All persons not residing as a prison or jail inmate shall be free to exercise their right to keep and bear arms as they see fit.



And that is all she wrote. What you presented is OBSCENE.
 
Surely, you realize that a reasonable compromise must be permitted for on both sides,

You apparently understand NOTHING of proper freedom. That, or you are a troll.

Which is it?

there are such things to be considered in civility, such as the mentally ill,

Oh yes? The "mentally ill" have no right to defend their own lives? That is the direct implication of your words.

Please elaborate and provide your proof of this. I will, in turn, demolish it piecemeal, in toto, and with brute cruelty for I am monstrously intolerant of such rank stupidity as this.

Come on and bring it. I challenge you to produce an argument that I cannot obliterate and render into dust.

people that have domestic abuse orders involving weapons or terroristic threats, terrorists and subversives, etc.

Blah blah blaaaaaaaahhhh... You should be horse whipped for boring us with this, the pablum of the ignorant coward.

Presently, there are about one-half-a-dozen bills pending in Congress to further cede individual's the right to keep, bear, and purchase arms and ammunition. You have to respect what this ultimately represents.

And your solution is to cede even more to "the state".

Genius.

Pilot to tail gunner... what ARE you doing back there?
 
Last edited:
Sadly, most of you posting thus far are relying upon entirely flawed logic. Think of it like this, you have an inherent right to travel unimpeded throughout our United States of America. However, this does not mean that you can just get into a vehicle and drive on public roads without a valid class-c license and automobile insurance, or while disobeying traffic laws, all simply by pointing to your right to travel about freely. We are a civilized and responsible society; being held individually accountable to those very high ethical standards through the enactment of both civil and criminal laws.

As to those of you appearing to have no issue with mentally ill, overly aggressive, and dangerously threatening or violent individuals having unrestricted access to firearms, would you still feel that way if, say one day (hypothetically), while at work a customer approaches your counter or desk to inform you that “the voices” from their television set have been telling them that they must shoot somebody and then commit suicide because the devil is very, very angry at you for having taken so long to answer the phone and turn on the lights for them, at which time you notice them waving around a chrome revolver as they begin jabbering verbal fragments that you cannot quite make out and pacing back and forth?

Furthermore, do you honestly believe that a man that has been criminally convicted of holding his wife hostage for two-days while repeatedly beating her unconscious and stabbing her multiple times before the police are finally called by concerned family members for a wellness check, because nobody had been answering the phone or door for them, even though their cars were seen parked in the driveway all weekend and the husband is known by the family as being abusive?

Or say that you are enjoying a Saturday noontime picnic at a local park with your family, when a group, of say, eight juvenile looking gang-member thugs setup for a barbeque next to the spot where you are at with your family, and begin drinking beer, smoking marijuana, and talking overly loud to the point of disturbing your family picnic, so you decide go over to them and kindly ask them to keep the noise down and to put out their joints because the smell is overbearing and foul, at which point they tell you go get lost and several of them lift up their shirts to show you the pistols tucked in their waistbands and begin barking and howling at you. Would you honestly find no issue with a group of young intoxicated criminal thugs freely possessing firearms?

In all respects, it is not so much an issue of such individuals not having the right to defend themselves, but more of an issue with their inability to correctly perceive reality or reason effectively and thus creates an impending danger of the general public.

Several had made comments that this proposal would be ceding our II Amendment rights over to the government. Clearly, this is entirely a misunderstanding on their part. What it is actually doing is realizing those very rights into statutory law at the national level, while also clarifying many aspects of firearms possession that is at present ambiguous.
 
Last edited:
This is pure garbage. Statist tripe.

Boo.

Hiss.

Burn the witch.

Here is your fucking law:

Sec. I

All laws restricting any weaponry of any sort is hereby repealed in toto and for all time.

Sec. II

All persons not residing as a prison or jail inmate shall be free to exercise their right to keep and bear arms as they see fit.



And that is all she wrote. What you presented is OBSCENE.

Well, according to your silly notions, that is in following your logic, the government neither possesses the lawful authority to jail or imprison anybody, because in doing so they are inhibiting their rights to freely travel.

Contrary to your misguided beliefs, our United States of America is not an anarchy. Our Nation is a constitutional republic founded upon common law.
 
Because all of the described are creations of the state ,, for the purpose on creating more laws.

Here, my wife helped me better clarify that clause:

WHEREAS, acts of terrorism, gang violence, drug violence, mental illness that including drug, prescription, and substance abuse, have long become established as a national epidemic, having resulted in a grave moral danger toward upholding civility and peacefulness throughout America, and effectively blockading the future of its social wellbeing;
 
Back
Top