This is a key point about media spin: frequently it's not that they have to be "corrected" about a story, it's that the journalist in question literally believes in lying.
A young creature called Rachel Weiner, who writes for the Washington Post, exemplifies this today. For those who know what really happened at each of these events, there is no other possible conclusion to be drawn: she is lying on purpose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...getting-testy/2012/01/09/gIQAhhP9lP_blog.html
A young creature called Rachel Weiner, who writes for the Washington Post, exemplifies this today. For those who know what really happened at each of these events, there is no other possible conclusion to be drawn: she is lying on purpose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...getting-testy/2012/01/09/gIQAhhP9lP_blog.html
