Proof that Vitamin B17 cured Cancer

[Zippyjuan]

Thank you for the link to the clinic.

Can you provide any sort of data as to their success rate in treating patients with laetrile at this clinic? Did these patients receive any other treatments along with the leatril? If they have treated "thousands" of patients, they should have lots of data. If it has been successful, I would think they would like to rave about the success rates they have been able to achieve- that would help them attract even more patients.

Update: I do find that they post success rates but do not say anything about which portion was due to laetrile and what was via other treatments.
http://www.oasisofhope.com/patient-survival-statistics.php

For example, they list multiple treatment protocols for breast cancer patients. When given multiple treatments, it is difficult to say which one or ones "cured" the patient.

Measures which include ozone autohemotherapy, laetrile treatments, the oxygen-carrier Perftec, high-dose biotin, salsalate, bicarbonate tumor alkalinization, and melatonin are employed in conjunction with conventional therapies with the intent of boosting tumor cell uptake offsetting the resistance of poorly-oxygenated tumor regions, and suppressing signaling pathways within the cancer that promote treatment resistance – all while minimizing risk for dangerous or unpleasant side effects. Ultra-aggressive protocols that would be likely to induce severe side effects are avoided, in line with Oasis' principle of "first do no harm".

For patients who have become resistant to chemo drugs that previously were effective for them, a strategy employed at Oasis known as epigenetic therapy, involving the safe drugs valproate and hydralazine, has the potential to re-establish treatment sensitivity to these drugs. Patients on the IRT-Q also receive several courses of intravenous vitamin C therapy, in an effort to kill more of the cancer cells with severe tumor-specific oxidative stress.

For patients who do not elect to have chemotherapy, or for whom chemotherapy would appear to be a poor option, the IRT-C protocol offers a more intense series of intravenous vitamin C sessions. Intravenous vitamin C therapy at Oasis is distinguished by novel adjunctive features such as ozone autohemotherapy and administration of Perftec, vitamin K and laetrile which are intended to boost tumor oxygenation and catalyze oxidant generation so as to maximize cancer cell kill.

If Laetrile was a proven cure I would think they would start with that as a treatment and skip the costs and risks of other ones like chemo- which even here seems to be the first form of treatment. Chemo still seems to be the emphasized primary treatment. Even this clinic does not use laetrile by itself to treat cancer but use it along with "other conventional therapies". If it was a cure alone, this would not be necessary.

 

[Magicman]

Thank you for the link to the clinic.

Can you provide any sort of data as to their success rate in treating patients with laetrile at this clinic? Did these patients receive any other treatments along with the leatril? If they have treated "thousands" of patients, they should have lots of data. If it has been successful, I would think they would like to rave about the success rates they have been able to achieve- that would help them attract even more patients.

Update: I do find that they post success rates but do not say anything about which portion was due to laetrile and what was via other treatments.
http://www.oasisofhope.com/patient-survival-statistics.php

For example, they list multiple treatment protocols for breast cancer patients. When given multiple treatments, it is difficult to say which one or ones "cured" the patient.


If Laetrile was a proven cure I would think they would start with that as a treatment and skip the costs and risks of other ones like chemo- which even here seems to be the first form of treatment. Chemo still seems to be the emphasized primary treatment. Even this clinic does not use laetrile by itself to treat cancer but use it along with "other conventional therapies". If it was a cure alone, this would not be necessary.

Firstly, you will never see any real doctor or any other expert in the practice or selling a cure anywhere in the world that will call any treatment a cure, even if patients have been cured because they will be arrested or kidnapped. This is a prime example of this happening. Other examples of this are here and here. Here is a prime example of someone who cured himself with Laetrile here. There are many factors to cancer and not all patients could cure themselves with just laetrile, especially those in later stages of cancer, poor diets, keep using carcinogens, have rare forms of cancer, with severe tumor growth, and those who have done chemotherapy.

Here are the statistics given from the treatment center. You have to wonder how many people came in as chemotherapy patients that dropped down the statistics as well.

http://www.oasisofhope.com/survival_statistics.php


Also, based on findings by Dr.Gonsalez

In the earlier cases submitted in 1993 to the NCI, Gonzalez had treated a variety of cancers in a variety of patients. Based on this presentation, the NCI suggested he pursue a pilot study with patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer - the theory being that because of the seriousness of this cancer, clear results would be quick to obtain. Cancer of the pancreas is rarely curable and five-year survival rates are only 4 per cent in the USA.

Gonzalez and Isaacs completed a pilot study, published in 1999, showing that patients on the Gonzalez regime lived on average 17.5 months - or three times longer than those taking conventional chemotherapy. So this is political dynamite.

The follow-up clinical trial used a nutritional therapy of supplements (from vitamins to animal glandular products), plus coffee enemas and pancreatic enzymes in patients diagnosed with Grade II, III and IV pancreatic cancers. And it competed with a control group of patients taking standard chemotherapy.

Though initially a minimum of 72 patients were to be enrolled in the study, far fewer eventually were admitted by the Principal Investigator at Columbia University.

The published paper from that trial, written without Dr. Gonzalez´s knowledge or consent, according to Gonzalez ´misrepresented´ the findings and claimed that chemotherapy had worked better when, in fact, the majority of patients on the nutritional arm were unable or unwilling to follow their treatment."


Gonzalez published reports of how Laetrile was more effective then chemotherapy but the NCI published falsified data trying to prove that chemotherapy was more powerful then Laetrile.

Gonzalez argues entered in the nutrition arm needed to be more carefully screened for suitability, mental health, dedication to the regimen, etc. In order to avoid major bias, patients in both arms have to be screened according to exactly the same criteria. This is very difficult to do in a study in which patients choose their own treatment regimen. Also the report is even more bias when Dr Gonzalez was excluded from the screening process to avoid preferential screening (cherry-picking) for the “nutritional arm”.
He also argues that patients who did not comply with the demanding nutritional protocol be excluded from the analysis. One possible reason for noncompliance is progression of the cancer Excluding these patients would introduce certain bias. This is exactly why an Intent-to-Treat analysis is necessary.

This science proves that orthodox methods don't work well. It also explains why glutathione, oxidative therapies should be a must which are not used in orthodox treatment.

"Experiments in this century, and particularly in the past thirty years, have suggested that the body has natural
immune mechanisms against cancer analogous to those that function in microbial infections. The corollary of this view
is that cancer can be controlled by enhancing the body's normal immune functions, which orthodox methods tend to
destroy."

Here is a case study proving that Gonsalez methods of using enzymes such as Glutathione works on Cancer.

http://www.turkjcancer.org/pdf/pdf_TJC_61.pdf

 

[zeloc]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15061600







No, you're caught in a lie, first when you made the statement about it being inactive ingredients and not worrying it means you have no understanding of what inactive ingredients means, either you're lying assuming I think that inactive means its not working or haven't looked up the definition, next the documentation said nothing about it being EITHER removed, there happens to be no choice, next when you say trace quantities all that means is a small amount the relevance of how small is never determined inside of the vaccine and the documentation fails to say whether that amount is safe or not. Plus, there is non-biased research that documents the effects of these "inactive" ingredients.





Why don't you post it and also your statement makes no sense as someone who is only in complementary medicine has nothing to do with laetrile therapy. Complementary medicine is like acupuncture, qi-gong, breathing techniques, etc. Also, would you care to explain the fact that our diet consists of cyanide from Vitamin B17 and you never hear anything about people suffering toxicity from these diets? Also, why is it indigenous tribes such as the Hopis and Hunza, their diet consists of mainly apricots they even eat the seeds and they rarely have Cancer? Why is it always the same research groups who have a vested interest in removing Laetrile always attempt to falsify documentation about these deaths yet they fail to explain how the food industry never has any. Any researcher who is paid off can skew data it isn't very difficult especially when those people are paid off by the same interests who have no interest in a natural treatment.

You talk about trace amounts of substances yet claim there are no ill effects from them. First, you provide absolutely no reason why vaccines should carry these toxic substances which means you are very disingenuine and not concerned about the baby's safety. You fail to state that babies receive over 30 shots in a quick session, (which is enormous compared to years ago) all with several toxic substances in each vaccine, these substances are not necessary and have no medical value. Also, you provide no proof that vaccines cause no harm when there are thousands of cases of babies with compromised immune systems, DNA damage, mitochondria damage, chemical damage, neurological problems, and inflammation reported. Many of these reports are buried by the Vaccine industry because vaccines have unscrupulous laws and most parents are unaware of the dangers of vaccines so they are not reported. Also, when you make asinine claims like these substances cause no harm you show that you have little understanding of the nature of the poisons and their effects. I can use non-biased information to prove that all of your statement is false and that information comes from sources not getting paid by the vaccine industry to create falsified reports.

Your statement is very inconsistent, you claim to be all for the benefits of vaccines, yet you are pushing for the dangerous substance in them as well. If you were genuine, you would try and be on a mission to remove these toxic substances from the vaccines. That is the issue, if you really want to get scientific yes, vaccines have saved a lot of lives, but your investing so much time in the vaccine your not understanding that there are far more effective methods to prevent any of those diseases then using vaccines like glutathione, silver, B12 just for starters. Plus, many of these substances pro-long life and make life more efficient and healthier and they seem to work so well with natural substances.

"From Dr. Mercola - It is also important to understand that autism was virtually unheard of before vaccinations; its emergence precisely parallels mass vaccination programs. ADD and learning disorders in children are also now being traced to childhood vaccinations. Brain damage, at any age, is by far the most common adverse reaction associated with vaccinations, although their actual numbers are not often reported accurately.
Furthermore, all vaccines are immunosuppressive, meaning that they lower your immune functions.

The chemicals and adjuvants in the vaccines depress your immune system;
The virus present depresses immune function, and
The foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues depresses immunity."


Now, let's talk about why your laetrile documents should not be used. You have to wonder why if a substance doesn't work how come these same institutions after being caught falsifying reports have to keep attacking it years later to create more falsified reports and repeat the mantra.

Your first website should not be taken seriously at all because it comes from the Sloane-Kettering Institute which Ralph Moss exposed as being a front for the American Medical Society which has no interest in Laetrile as a Cancer remedy.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15061600

Your second website has falsified data and claims that laetrile has adverse dangerous side effects, the entire case study is intellectually dishonest, which shows that the researcher is making this up from other falsified data, repeating this mantra and basically using scare tactics to dismay people from using the substance. Both biased reports which show little understanding of the data. If they were honest they would explain that cyanide is a beneficial substance that is found in our diet that attacks cancer cells and is broken down by the bodie's rhodonese. Instead, they resort to the usual skewing data tactics. All of the "sound clinical data" that they made up is not referenced so they are using a scientific mantra proven wrong to substantiate that claim and expecting you to take their word for it.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22071824

BACKGROUND:
Laetrile is the name for a semi-synthetic compound which is chemically related to amygdalin, a cyanogenic glycoside from the kernels of apricots and various other species of the genus Prunus. Laetrile and amygdalin are promoted under various names for the treatment of cancer although there is no evidence for its efficacy. Due to possible cyanide poisoning, laetrile can be dangerous.


AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
The claims that laetrile or amygdalin have beneficial effects for cancer patients are not currently supported by sound clinical data. There is a considerable risk of serious adverse effects from cyanide poisoning after laetrile or amygdalin, especially after oral ingestion. The risk-benefit balance of laetrile or amygdalin as a treatment for cancer is therefore unambiguously negative.


Here are publications of Laetrile. If you notice that all of the bad research towards Laetrile comes after the positive results which proves the fact that they want to bury its effectiveness. If Laetrile didn't work you would find bad results around this time period that other researchers found positive results on.

On another note, the only time when serious consideration towards research was when there was positive research at the Sloane-Kettering Institute, the researchers then continued to find more positive studies instead of printing those out they dumped them and that is when Ralph Moss spoke out and was fired from the research company.




Peer-Reviewed Professional Publications

• Burk, D.,et al. Hyperthermy of cancer cells with Amigdaline glucosidase and synergistic action of derivated cyanide and benzaldehyde. Minerva Chir. 24:1144- 1145, 1969.
• Navarro, M. et al. Mechanism of action and therapeutic effects of Laetrile in cancer. J. Phillip. Med. Assoc. 33:620-627., 1957.
• Reitnauer, P. Prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice following feeding bitter almonds. Archiv Geschwulstforschung. 42:135, 1973.
• Summa H. M. Amygdalin. A physiological active therapeutic agent in malignancies. Krebsgeschehen, a., Jossa-Arznei, Steinan, Germany, 1972.

Laypersons’ Publications

• Culbert, Michael F. Freedom from Cancer: The Amazing Story of Vitamin B-17, or Laetrile. 76 Press.
• Culbert, Michael. Vitamin B-17: Forbidden Weapon Against Cancer; The Fight for Laetrile. Arlington House Publications. November 1974.
• Diamond, W. J., et al. (editors). An Alternative Medicine Definitive Guide to Cancer. Future Medicine Publications. Tiburon, California, USA. 1997.
Amygdalin appears to neutralize the oxidative cancer-promoting compounds such as free
radicals. Laetrile should be considered an effective, entirely safe treatment of all types of
cancer. Laetrile is useful for the prevention of cancer and for maintaining its remission. Some
contributors to this book claim that “there is nothing as effective as laetrile”. Laetrile can be
used indefinitely and if necessary, in conjunction with surgery, radiation therapy and
chemotherapy. Specific types of cancer mentioned as being responsive to laetrile include lung
cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, prostate cancer and
lymphomas. Some contributors recommend using n-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in conjunction with
laetrile for cancer therapy. This is because cysteine maximizes the body’s ability to detoxify the
cyanide released from Taetrile. Some contributors have found that laetrile reduces the
requirement for painkillers in cancer patients.
• Griffin, G. E. World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17.
• Hill, Rick. Too Young to Die: Dramatic Use of Laetrile to Conquer Terminal Cancer. Rick Hill Publications. June 1979.
• Inozenzov, F. Two fungus like tumors healed without operation, by oral Amigdalin. Gazet Med. de Paris. 37, 1845.
• Kittler, Glenn D. Laetrile Control for Cancer. Astor Honor. June 1963.
• Knaus, H. Laetrile Control for Cancer. Astor Honor. March 1963.
• Moss, Ralph W. Cancer Therapy: the Independent Consumer’s Guide to Non-Toxic Treatment & Prevention. Equinox Press, Brooklyn, New York, USA. 1992:267-274.
• Prince, Patricia. The Contreras Clinic Laetrile Cookbook. Devin-Adair Pub. September 1979.
• Richardson, John and P. Griffin. Laetrile Case Histories. Bantam Books. June 1977.
• South, J. Laetrile: the answer to cancer? Anti-Aging Bulletin. 4(7):10-20, 2000.
Laetrile may kill cancer cells via a synergistic cytotoxic reaction between its breakdown products - cyanide and benzaldehyde.
• Timms, Moira. Natural Sources: Vitamin B-17/Laetrile. Celestial Arts. March 1978.
• Politics, science, and cancer: the laetrile phenomenon. Westview Press for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington.

It seems that you just want to believe that laetrile works and you will ignore anything that is contradictory to that hypothesis. Your post is rambling and doesn't make sense. Why is it that the last positive peer reviewed professional publication is more than 30 years ago?? If this stuff worked there should be a lot more physicians using it.

There's no evidence that glutathione, silver, or B12 prevent the diseases that vaccines prevent. I don't know where you are getting your knowledge. If 99% of persons are vaccinated and it is truly as dangerous as you claim then there should be far more adverse cases when the number of adverse cases is tiny. Why doesn't everyone in the world have autism?

As I mentioned before, there have been 0 studies linking autism with vaccines. Why would you believe something when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever for it?

It would be interesting if the increase in autism paralleled vaccines but this is simply false. Vaccines have been around for over 200 years.

I don't see why it is at all unusual that there are trace and inactive ingredients in vaccines. Vaccines are enormously complicated, I mean they actually activate the human immune system to produce antibodies against disease, unless you've studied the subject why would you think it is unusual?

There is far more evidence against all of the stuff you are espousing than for it. If this stuff about a doctor Gonzalez is true I'd like to see a paper on it, where is the reference for that?

 

[Magicman]

It seems that you just want to believe that laetrile works and you will ignore anything that is contradictory to that hypothesis. Your post is rambling and doesn't make sense. Why is it that the last positive peer reviewed professional publication is more than 30 years ago?? If this stuff worked there should be a lot more physicians using it.

There's no evidence that glutathione, silver, or B12 prevent the diseases that vaccines prevent. I don't know where you are getting your knowledge. If 99% of persons are vaccinated and it is truly as dangerous as you claim then there should be far more adverse cases when the number of adverse cases is tiny. Why doesn't everyone in the world have autism?

As I mentioned before, there have been 0 studies linking autism with vaccines. Why would you believe something when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever for it?

It would be interesting if the increase in autism paralleled vaccines but this is simply false. Vaccines have been around for over 200 years.

I don't see why it is at all unusual that there are trace and inactive ingredients in vaccines. Vaccines are enormously complicated, I mean they actually activate the human immune system to produce antibodies against disease, unless you've studied the subject why would you think it is unusual?

There is far more evidence against all of the stuff you are espousing than for it. If this stuff about a doctor Gonzalez is true I'd like to see a paper on it, where is the reference for that?

It seems that you just want to believe that laetrile works and you will ignore anything that is contradictory to that hypothesis. Your post is rambling and doesn't make sense. Why is it that the last positive peer reviewed professional publication is more than 30 years ago?? If this stuff worked there should be a lot more physicians using it.

The science proves that Laetrile works as well as non-biased studies. My post makes perfect sense I think it points out that you're a dishonest establishment goon that knows little about medical research and treatments except for creating falsified data on vaccines. Provide me anything that isn't supported by the Billion dollar cancer industry that has no interest in Laetrile that is a non-biased study and doesn't put out falsified data. You also conveniently ignored the fact that it has been banned by the European Union and U.S. and you wonder why your not hearing anything about it. The illegitimate excuses for it being banned prove that the Cancer industry is lying and has no interest in it being a legitimate alternative.

There's no evidence that glutathione, silver, or B12 prevent the diseases that vaccines prevent. I don't know where you are getting your knowledge. If 99% of persons are vaccinated and it is truly as dangerous as you claim then there should be far more adverse cases when the number of adverse cases is tiny. Why doesn't everyone in the world have autism?

I could tell already that you have no idea what you're talking about you can find case studies that are linked to every disease and glutathione on pubmed, silver has always been used throughout history to remove bacteria and viruses, and B12 is in tons of pubmed studies as well and even used by neurologists and B12 deficiency is common, this shows you have done no research on any of the therapies I listed and you have no sincerity about finding out the real data. Your last argument is a strawman argument and basically does not make sense as to why we should put mercury or formaldehyde in vaccines. It also dodges the fact that everyone's neurological and immune system is different. 1 in 166 is a pretty significant number for autism, and they have been directly linked to vaccine toxicity.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mark-hyman/autism-mercury-toxicity_b_497047.html

In response, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the American Academy of Autism released an "Autism Alarm" stating that 1 in 166 children in the US have autistic spectrum disorder (ASD).

If you were sincere about stopping diseases you would look into what boosts the immune system like the therapies I listed not suppress it like in the case of vaccines and their preservatives, and poisonous and immune suppressive inactive ingredients. If you had any morals which you clearly do not you would at least give a system on how to remove any of the side effects and poisons from the toxicity of the vaccines like I have provided instead you defend them, you basically are defending the use of toxic substances on innocent children, (P.S. Go kill yourself) and you clearly ignore that data and just expose your motives more and more on this board, oh great Reptilian overlord.

As I mentioned before, there have been 0 studies linking autism with vaccines.

Bullshit. Your lies are bigger then pinochio. I already provided plenty as well as Donnay. Keep trollin' dickhead. Go read the article from the Huffingtonpost, that clearly shows how to treat Autism and its toxic vaccine agents. The doctor knows A LOT more then you and has had mercury poisoning, I would trust his methods over your ineffective methods any day.

Why would you believe something when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever for it?

When you can disprove biomedical therapy and that it has results on Autism by chelating the agents used in vaccines then please shut up your an idiot. Noone on this board wants to hear a liar reiterate the same argument over and over again when their full of shit to begin with. "In people with a genetic susceptibility, such as a defect in the enzymes responsible for detoxifying heavy metals, prenatal and early postnatal exposure to mercury leads to neurologic damage resulting in autistic symptoms". That explains why some people are susceptible while others are not.

It would be interesting if the increase in autism paralleled vaccines but this is simply false. Vaccines have been around for over 200 years.

I don't see why it is at all unusual that there are trace and inactive ingredients in vaccines. Vaccines are enormously complicated, I mean they actually activate the human immune system to produce antibodies against disease, unless you've studied the subject why would you think it is unusual?

Give it up, you eugenicist supporting troll. You were caught in a lie defending poisons, noone should take your argument seriously.

There is far more evidence against all of the stuff you are espousing than for it. If this stuff about a doctor Gonzalez is true I'd like to see a paper on it, where is the reference for that?

If that were the case then why not let honest research prevail and also allow it to be unbanned? It simply is dishonest to allow the same agencies to fund research to falsify data then let honest research happen. I provided the research it's your job to look it up. Don't be lazy.

 

[donnay]

Morpheus: "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door.
You're the one that has to walk through it."

 

[Magicman]

Morpheus: "I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door.
You're the one that has to walk through it."

Basically, these goons are anti-Ron Paul policies such as health freedoms, and support government agencies to control our life, Ron Paul argues for free markets and is against chrony capitalism. The reason why we have been so blinded is we've allowed the information and regulations to be controlled by a select few, this has made standards of evil proportions reflect our businesses as a whole where almost every industry is compromised to suite their agency practice. When these agencies provide standards where it is at the point where our own innocent children are being laced with toxic agents you know that our society is immoral and corrupt and if we continue to allow it to be this way in what has been a small amount of history of these evil practices we will surely imagine a future society where our grandchildren are genetically altered to be complacent with the NWO's plans of complacency, power and control.

These trolls are part of the hierarchy of big government, they need little busy worker bees to do their bidding for them. Their a lot like the agents from the Matrix they all think alike and act alike. It's too bad Neo and Morpheus kicked their asses.

 

[donnay]

Basically, these goons are anti-Ron Paul policies such as health freedoms, and support government agencies to control our life, Ron Paul argues for free markets and is against chrony capitalism. The reason why we have been so blinded is we've allowed the information and regulations to be controlled by a select few, this has made standards of evil proportions reflect our businesses as a whole where almost every industry is compromised to suite their agency practice. When these agencies provide standards where it is at the point where our own innocent children are being laced with toxic agents you know that our society is immoral and corrupt and if we continue to allow it to be this way in what has been a small amount of history of these evil practices we will surely imagine a future society where our grandchildren are genetically altered to be complacent with the NWO's plans of complacency, power and control.

These trolls are part of the hierarchy of big government, they need little busy worker bees to do their bidding for them. Their a lot like the agents from the Matrix they all think alike and act alike. It's too bad Neo and Morpheus kicked their asses.

Once you free your mind, and do your own research, it will amaze you how much we have been lied to!!

+rep

 

[Magicman]

Once you free your mind, and do your own research, it will amaze you how much we have been lied to!!

+rep

Ron Paul's system (Austrian economics, free trade, constitution, bill of rights, libertarian ism) is one way to break out of the establishment system, but it's a lot bigger then that. The problem is that people who free their mind and have the knowledge lack the resources to awake others so it's the duty of those who have the knowledge to unselfishly accept that duty and give it their hardest.

 

[donnay]

Being that we are on the movie the Matrix, I think of this part where everyone is eating foods laced with Monosodium Glutamate (which tricks our brains), Preservatives and other chemicals which are slow kills too...ignorance is bliss.