Progressives take aim at the 1st Amendment

[Swordsmyth]

Swordshyll has nothing to add, but thinks whoever adds the last post wins.

Tulsa can't defend his position so he attacks his opponent instead, kind of like how he wants the government to silence anyone he disagrees with.

 

[acptulsa]

Tulsa can't defend his position so he attacks his opponent instead, kind of like how he wants the government to silence anyone he disagrees with.

Irony so thick you can slice it with a knife...

 

[Swordsmyth]

Irony so thick you can slice it with a knife...

What goes around comes around.

 

[acptulsa]

What goes around comes around.

And some things deserved to be protected from later edits--like you calling for letting Washington control internet content outright.

P.S. I would consider supporting a "Free speech" web-hosting/search engine/file hosting service as a part of the post office, they would be the ones to run a "net neutrality" ISP as well.

That's the libertarian way to get the government out if it, by God!

 

[jmdrake]

Swordshyll has nothing to add, but thinks whoever adds the last post wins.





Right you are. But at least we can say that the CIA didn't finance Josh and Bryan's startup.

Unlike Fedbook. So we're clearly not as dead wrong as Zuckerberg.

Hmmm...interesting point that I hadn't looked up.

https://dailyreckoning.com/revealed-facebooks-cia-connections/

So the CIA, Facebook and Peter Thiel are connected. Peter Thiel is connected to Bilderberg and Donald Trump.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...al-co-founder-to-be-delegate-for-donald-trump

 

[Swordsmyth]

And some things deserved to be protected from later edits--like you calling for letting Washington control internet content outright.



That's the libertarian way to get the government out if it, by God!

That doesn't call for government control, it says that the Post Office could provide an alternative.

 

[acptulsa]

That doesn't call for government control, it says that the Post Office could provide an alternative.

Yeah, because the postal service is clearly out of control, right?

A federal government alternative to free speech is what you've been advocating throughout this thread.

All I called for was just enough of a mute on the politicians that the people can be heard. That's what made you go ballistic.

As if the Bill if Rights was intended to allow the government to do whatever it damned well pleases.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yeah, because the postal service is clearly out of control, right?

A federal government alternative to free speech is what you've been advocating throughout this thread.

The World Turned Upside Down

I called for private citizens to be given their right to buy and sell campaign ads and that is a "federal government alternative to free speech"?

In the other thread about the Post Office I pointed out that those who want the government to force private companies to follow "Net Neutrality" regulations should instead want the Post Office to provide a neutral alternative that is covered by the 1stA and that is a "federal government alternative to free speech"?

You are the advocate of government speech control as opposed to free speech and just like a typical progressive you twist the facts into knots and call black white and day night.

 

[acptulsa]

I misspoke. Suggesting a way to help citizens speak louder than politicians and international corporations didn't cause him to go ballistic.

It actually caused him to go postal.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I misspoke. Suggesting a way to help citizens speak louder than politicians and international corporations didn't cause him to go ballistic.

It actually caused him to go postal.

You can spin it all you want and it won't change the fact that you want to give government the power to say who is allowed to speak and how they are allowed to do it.

If you think that power won't be used against you then you are truly delusional.

 

[acptulsa]

The thing you're defending is being used against the people right now, thanks to your beloved Bush Swampublicans on the Court.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The thing you're defending is being used against the people right now, thanks to your beloved Bush Swampublicans on the Court.

And you want us to jump out of the frying pan into the fire.

The solution is less government not more.

How can you be this ignorant after being on this site since 2008?

Are you the same tulsa that joined in 2008?

 

[acptulsa]

How can you be this ignorant after being on this site since 2008?

I've been wasting my time learning the site guidelines.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Any one who takes aim at the 1st amendment is a traitor.

 

[AZJoe]

“Please forgive me, O left-wing guardians of allowable opinion, for I have expressed an unapproved thought.” - Thomas Woods