Pregnant woman "I have to be able to kill my baby in order to save it."

[jmdrake]

So....this 9 month pregnant woman thinks she can't protect her unborn baby unless she is able to kill it. Can we have an HONEST discussion about abortion? Both extremes make no sense. Someone shouldn't be able to kill a baby just because it hasn't crossed the vaginal threshold. And a 5 day old embryo, no heartbeat, no brainwaves, does not feel pain, doesn't count as a separate life IMO though I understand those who disagree. What's nutty about that 9 month pregnant mom is Roe v Wade NEVER protected the "right" of a woman to kill her baby in the third trimester. This is just demonic.

https://www.nbcnews.com/video/pregn...eme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade-142797893748

NBC News’ Julie Ainsley spoke with a woman who was 9-months pregnant that called the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe V. Wade “horrible” and said she doesn’t know how to protect her unborn child if they won’t “have the options that they need to make bodily choices.”​

 

[TheTexan]

I think abortion should be fine up to the point where the baby self identifies as human.

But if they self identify as deer they are open season

 

[Anti Globalist]

I wonder what this woman's answer would be if she was told the murder of a pregnant woman is considered a double homicide by law enforcement.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Probably the best thing the SCOTUS could have done was kick the issue back to the states. Even among pro-life states you have varying time frames on abortion bans. People should just filter themselves to whatever state has laws they most-agree with.

Or to put it more precisely, liberals should stop moving to states with laws they disagree with and then stamping their feet when they suddenly realize they are in the wrong place surrounded by people who do not share their beliefs. They could also stop rioting in states that already legalize abortion, but granted that doesn't do much for political power. I can absolutely promise you that conservatives do not move to solid blue states with pipe dreams about shifting the political climate.

As for an 'honest discussion' on abortion, I do not see it happening. Mostly because the issue falls into two main categories: A) You believe that abortion is murder and the most egregious offense you can commit against another is murder, or B) You believe that abortion is simply a personal medical procedure and the most egregious offense you can commit is to take away someone's right to decide for themselves.

There's not really a Venn diagram overlap there. It's like asking someone what their favorite vegetable is, A) dolphins? or B) paperweights?

The sides really can't be any more different. So split up, I say, and let the states sort it out.

 

[dannno]

Or to put it more precisely, liberals should stop moving to states with laws they disagree with

You have to wonder if that was impetus for the states to start pushing these laws in the first place.

 

[nobody's_hero]

You have to wonder if that was impetus for the states to start pushing these laws in the first place.

We need more wedge issues IMO. And I'm not being sarcastic. People with radically different ideologies are living on top of each other and it ain't healthy.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Federal $$ should stop coming from and going to states. States decide their own policies. Why should a state thousands of miles away be paying for policies they do not support?

 

[Invisible Man]

So....this 9 month pregnant woman thinks she can't protect her unborn baby unless she is able to kill it. Can we have an HONEST discussion about abortion? Both extremes make no sense. Someone shouldn't be able to kill a baby just because it hasn't crossed the vaginal threshold. And a 5 day old embryo, no heartbeat, no brainwaves, does not feel pain, doesn't count as a separate life IMO though I understand those who disagree. What's nutty about that 9 month pregnant mom is Roe v Wade NEVER protected the "right" of a woman to kill her baby in the third trimester. This is just demonic.

Roe v. Wade did protect the right to abortion in the third trimester if deemed necessary for the life or health of the mother.

I think later rulings decided that "health" included mental health, which turned that into an effectively unlimited right to abortion on demand all the way up to birth.

 

[jmdrake]

Roe v. Wade did protect the right to abortion in the third trimester if deemed necessary for the life or health of the mother.

I think later rulings decided that "health" included mental health, which turned that into an effectively unlimited right to abortion on demand all the way up to birth.

Okay. But this woman wasn't talking about HER health. She was saying she needed to be able to have an abortion to protect her BABY. Which...makes no sense.

 

[Dr.3D]

Seems obvious, these people don't know what causes pregnancy.

 

[acptulsa]

Seems obvious, these people don't know what causes pregnancy.

They don't know what causes recession, inflation, precipitation, or even food. What made you think they know where anything at all comes from?

 

[Dr.3D]

They don't know what causes recession, inflation, precipitation, or even food. What made you think they know where anything at all comes from?

So Darwinism takes it's course.

 

[acptulsa]

So Darwinism takes it course.

Looks to me like somebody supercharged Darwinism. Darwin had JATO packs strapped to his ass.

 

[Dr.3D]

Looks to me like somebody supercharged Darwinism. Darwin had JATO packs strapped to his ass.

So even after 50 years of liberal abortions, it still hasn't wiped out stupid.

 

[nobody's_hero]

So even after 50 years of liberal abortions, it still hasn't wiped out stupid.

That's because conservative household kids go to liberal schools and universities, and get their minds warped. Not all, but enough to keep the replacements coming.

 

[Okie RP fan]

Whoa there, it's pregnant "person" now. Can you please make sure to keep up with all of the latest rule changes?

Sarcasm aside, these people are mentally unwell. They are immature ninnies who want consequence free sex. That's it, folks.

 

[Okie RP fan]

That's because conservative household kids go to liberal schools and universities, and get their minds warped. Not all, but enough to keep the replacements coming.

This is why it's a very real hypothesis that these people will breed themselves out. I think they know this, hence why they're getting to the rest of our children.
1. Because they are evil perverts
2. Because they don't/won't have progeny to pass their nonsense onto
3. Because they are parasites