Planned Parenthood fights for freedom to spread AIDS

[bobbyw24]

In a guide for young people published by the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the organization says it opposes laws that make it a crime for people not to tell sexual partners they have HIV. The IPPF’s “Healthy, Happy and Hot” guide also tells young people who have the virus that they have a right to “fun, happy and sexually fulfilling lives.”

HIV is the virus that causes AIDS.

“Some countries have laws that say people living with HIV must tell their sexual partner(s) about their status before having sex, even if they use condoms or only engage in sexual activity with a low risk of giving HIV to someone else,” the guide states. “These laws violate the rights of people living with HIV by forcing them to disclose or face the possibility of criminal charges.”

Under the heading “Sexual Pleasure and Well-Being,” the guide declares that it is a human right and not a criminal issue as to whether a person decides if or when to disclose their HIV status, even if they engage in sexual activities.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/11/planned-parenthood-fights-to-keep-hiv-infections-up/#ixzz0kshaPtlz

 

[Bman]

YouTube - Team America Song EVERYONE HAS AIDS!

 

[Cinderella]

hmm im on the fence with this one...its def wrong to go around giving people aids but some people are so careless and dont protect themselves!! its their own fault!! as is taught in healthcare, you treat everyone as though they have an infectious disease.....same should go for your sexual partners!!! practice safe or no sex!! and if you decide to have sex get a freaking STD check!! thing is people are lazy and dont care!! people are too trusting of others!! its your own life and its your responsibility to protect it!

 

[BuddyRey]

I'm also on the fence here, since passing a law regarding such a delicate and personal issue just seems like asking the state to become more involved in the bedroom, yet declaring that it's a "human right" to deliberately put people at risk of transmitting a lethal virus is pure lunacy as well.

And why am I not surprised that it's Planned Parenthood (Planned Eugenics) that's behind this whole nasty affair?

 

[dannno]

How do we know that the HIV virus is actually harmful?

I know someone who has lived for over 20 years with the HIV virus and only tooks AIDS drugs for maybe 1 or 2 years.

If you look at the research from Dr. Duesburg of the University of Berkeley, it's quite compelling.. the condition AIDS is caused by a whole variety of of different things from the use of hard drugs, malnutrition and a disease commonly associated with homosexual activity that is easily treatable if the patient doesn't happen to have the HIV virus in them (otherwise it is assumed automatically that AIDS comes from the presence of the HIV virus)

I'm Definitely against the law either way. It could be difficult to prove that the person even knew they had HIV, at which point, why would anybody want to get tested? They can go out and legally have sex if they don't get tested, or they can get tested and be prevented from having sex without disclosing. This simply causes more irresponsible behavior.

 

[MelissaWV]

I wonder why HIV got picked on here, too. There are a lot of other really nasty STDs out there. It will get to the point that you have to declare any potentially deadly disease to anyone who might get it from you, which means pretty much anything you've got. Perhaps we could stitch the relevant letter to your vest.

Assume everyone you're going to have sex with MIGHT have SOMETHING. At the very least, assume they have the missing ingredient for a baby to happen. Take precautions. Double them. Don't have sex with people with which you wouldn't enter into contracts with, because that's what sex has become on many levels. If you can't discuss condoms, or the pill, or anything else, and if you don't know the other person's stand on abortion, and if you don't at least have some idea of what their habits are (the other person could be a virgin, but an IV drug user...)... then don't do it.

But those are just suggestions. Codifying it won't do anyone a bit of good.

 

[swirling_vortex]

I'm more in-the-middle about this. I don't think that anyone should disclose their info since something like that would be very hard to enforce. However, if someone lied to you about an STD, then there should be some form of punishment.

 

[amy31416]

How do we know that the HIV virus is actually harmful?

I know someone who has lived for over 20 years with the HIV virus and only tooks AIDS drugs for maybe 1 or 2 years.

If you look at the research from Dr. Duesburg of the University of Berkeley, it's quite compelling.. the condition AIDS is caused by a whole variety of of different things from the use of hard drugs, malnutrition and a disease commonly associated with homosexual activity that is easily treatable if the patient doesn't happen to have the HIV virus in them (otherwise it is assumed automatically that AIDS comes from the presence of the HIV virus)

I'm Definitely against the law either way. It could be difficult to prove that the person even knew they had HIV, at which point, why would anybody want to get tested? They can go out and legally have sex if they don't get tested, or they can get tested and be prevented from having sex without disclosing. This simply causes more irresponsible behavior.

Just out of curiosity, would you have zero issue doing a chick if she had AIDS or HIV?

 

[MelissaWV]

I'm more in-the-middle about this. I don't think that anyone should disclose their info since something like that would be very hard to enforce. However, if someone lied to you about an STD, then there should be some form of punishment.

Most assuredly, but how would you go about showing they lied?

It's a verbal exchange, and you have every incentive to say the other person lied.

Short of a physical contract, I'm not sure what would suffice there.

 

[Natalie]

This reminds me of the case of Philippe Padieu. He knew he had HIV, and met all these different women and had sex with them and infected them. He was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The deadly weapon being his semen.

Here is an article about it: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7696939&page=1

 

[Brian4Liberty]

It seems like the purpose of these laws is to give them something to charge a person with after the fact.

Remember the huge stink about the guy that got on the plane with contagious TB?

I am on the fence as well. I get angry with people who come to work running a fever. At the very least, it's rude and selfish. In the case of life-threatening diseases, a person who willfully exposes others is a danger to society.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

I know someone who has lived for over 20 years with the HIV virus and only tooks AIDS drugs for maybe 1 or 2 years.

I knew someone who had HIV and died. People are still dying from it.

He also smoked a lot of medical marijuana. Maybe that's what killed him.

 

[Cinderella]

It seems like the purpose of these laws is to give them something to charge a person with after the fact.

Remember the huge stink about the guy that got on the plane with contagious TB?

I am on the fence as well. I get angry with people who come to work running a fever. At the very least, it's rude and selfish. In the case of life-threatening diseases, a person who willfully exposes others is a danger to society.

on the flip side anyone willingly having sex with these people without taking the proper precautions are a danger to society....

 

[Brian4Liberty]

on the flip side anyone willingly having sex with these people without taking the proper precautions are a danger to society....

No, they are a danger to themselves. Huge difference.

 

[Cinderella]

its the new strands of HIV that are leading to a stronger form of aids that is killing poeple....the virus mutates...we have had HIV meds for quite some time...the HIV that was around 20 30 yrs ago was alot less dedaly than the evil mutation that we have created now

 

[Cinderella]

No, they are a danger to themselves. Huge difference.

themselves?? they are part of our society. People are very irresponsible...if they were carless enough to contract the diease whos to say they wouldnt be careless enough to spread it? ---playing devils advocate here

 

[dannno]

Just out of curiosity, would you have zero issue doing a chick if she had AIDS or HIV?

Well I'm still on the fence about the whole thing but I tend to think an otherwise healthy individual leading a healthy lifestyle and avoiding AIDS medications would not be affected adversely by HIV...

However if I knew a girl had HIV and I were single and she was smoking I suppose I'd do it, but still protect myself, considering even without protection it is very uncommon for females to transfer HIV to males during regular intercourse. If it were a girl I was actually considering spending the rest of my (or her) life with then I would go and meet more AIDS dissidents and do some more research to see for myself. At that point if I were happy with what I saw and convinced that HIV wasn't harmful I might consider having unprotected sex with her if we were in love. Kids is certainly another issue, I'd have to be REALLY damn sure before bringing a kid into the world who might possibly (but not necessarily) transfer the HIV virus to the child. So she'd probably be on birth control.

I think there are more effective ways of finding out the truth behind this HIV/AIDS connection if we simply had a more open society and less control over our lives by the medical industrial complex. If it were found out that I had HIV I wouldn't take AIDS drugs, I would use alternatives and I would keep a licensed physician up to date on my progress so there is some documentation of what happened to me.. although there is already a ginormous list of physicians who are AIDS dissidents so I imagine that I wouldn't be the first to do so.

 

[dannno]

I knew someone who had HIV and died. People are still dying from it.

They didn't die from HIV, nobody dies from HIV, they died from AIDS.

There are a lot of different things that cause the condition known as AIDS including AIDS drugs. Did your friend take AIDS drugs?

I don't doubt your friend died from AIDS, what I'm questioning is how the condition AIDS was caused, because there are many causes and no proof that I have seen that HIV is one of them.

 

[Cinderella]

people dont die from aids or hiv...they die from the complications...your friend could have had a bad bout with diareah and as a result of his compromised immune system, he died...or pnuemonia is another common cause

 

[dannno]

people dont die from aids or hiv...they die from the complications...your friend could have had a bad bout with diareah and as a result of his compromised immune system, he died...or pnuemonia is another common cause

That's a good point, the condition known as AIDS just means your immune system isn't functioning. There are many different things that are known to give people this condition known as AIDS. The question is does HIV cause AIDS, or is it the AIDS drugs themselves, other diseases also are known to cause AIDS, malnutrition, heavy drug use including poppers that were popular in the homosexual community..

Think about where AIDS is most predominant.. homosexuals, drug users, people in Africa who are malnourished as well as those who are able to afford AIDS medications. These are all causes of AIDS without the help of a magic little virus that acts unlike any other virus ever perceived... I mean, I suppose it's possible... but from what I've seen the reason HIV increased rapidly in the population is because they increased HIV testing rapidly. They rose in harmony. According to some the HIV virus has been present in humans indefinitely and is harmless. A few people in the medical industrial complex created a giant hoax to sell some toxic drugs they made too much of, as well as the fact that they have a depopulation agenda.