Petitions to substitute the Boers for other "refugees"

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
South Africa’s white farmers have their collective heads on the block following the vote by the country’s parliament to expropriate their land without compensation. The plan’s main proponent, Julius Malema of the Economic Freedom Fighters party, says white farmers are “criminals” who must be driven off the land. Make no mistake, this is shorthand for extermination. Congress should immediately direct that U.S. refugee policy be reoriented to rescue these victims threatened by looming—indeed, developing—genocide, as it did with the notorious Lautenberg Amendment, which captured the U.S. refugee intake to favor Soviet Jews. But President Trump doesn’t have to wait—there is precedent for immediate Executive Action.

Even the Leftist Newsweek Magazine takes a dim view of the future for white farmers in a country once touted as a burgeoning “rainbow” paradise where “one man, one vote” and Marxist central planning would lead to prosperity for all South Africans—blacks, whites, coloreds and Asians. [Thousands Sign Petition Asking Trump to Let White Farmers in South Africa Migrate to U.S. After Country Votes to Force Them Off Land, by Chantal Da Silver, Newsweek, March 1, 2018] Newsweek’s story noted a Change.org online petition of more than 18,000 signatures asking Trump to accept white South African Christians in place of Somali Muslims and Middle Easterners who are difficult to vet and prone to non-assimilation. There’s also a White House petition: Immigration Priority to South African Farmers facing Systematic Land Confiscations and Murder February 28, 2018. But Trump already holds all the executive power he needs, and the legal cover, to pull off a sweeping rescue mission of South African refugees. A provision in the 1980 Refugee Act specifically allows for emergency extraction of vulnerable populations subject only to a Congressional hearing (not legislation):
(B) After the President initiates appropriate consultation prior to making a determination, under subsection (b), that the number of refugee admissions should be increased because of an unforeseen emergency refugee situation, to the extent that time and the nature of the emergency refugee situation permit, a hearing to review the proposal to increase refugee admissions shall be held unless public disclosure of the details of the proposal would jeopardize the lives or safety of individuals.
Of course, ideally Trump would also get Congress on board with a plan for an emergency increase in refugees from South Africa. He could lean on Australia, New Zealand and the U.K. to pitch in and accept these threatened farmers.
It’s been done before. In 1990 the U.S. Congress adopted legislation creating the Lautenberg program, named after U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, to resettle Soviet Jews in the United States.
The Lautenberg program was then expanded in 2003 to pave the way for persecuted Iranian Christians to be resettled in the U.S.
All that is needed is for the president to step up and lead.

More at: http://www.vdare.com/articles/congr...icans-but-trump-can-take-executive-action-now

Petitions:

https://www.change.org/p/donald-j-trump-genocide-of-whites-in-south-africa

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pe...cing-systematic-land-confiscations-and-murder
 
Probably for the best. The Boers don't seem genetically disposed towards liberty.
 
What?

That they get exterminated?

That is what The Vampire is saying.
I think he doesn't really mean it but having erroneously identified me as a white supremacist he thinks it is funny to throw a reversal of the "genetic predisposition towards liberty" theory (which I don't believe) in my face.
 
Hopefully they can find a way to stay. If they have to leave, Holland seems like it should be the first choice, maybe the UK. That being said, there was a lot of migration to the US from SA back in the 90s.

While not a fan of putting people in the front of the immigration line because "it's for the (refugee) children!", if one does subscribe to refugee priority, this would be a case that would probably qualify.
 
Id rather they declare their independence from SA, form their own country rendering the expropriation invalid. Then get Trump to officially recognize their new country and sell them any munitions they want to defend themselves.
 
Wouldn't mind seeing these guys get a dose of the jolly prankster, or any other people threatening peoples life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness

Canada's denial and claim of fake news is grotesque
 
Could happen, yeah. It's unfortunate, but we've got to -

Oh, I see, a clever and sarcastic play on my past comments.

Guess what, I stand by them.

Let the Boers fight and regain what was their's, or repatriate back to the Netherlands.
 
Id rather they declare their independence from SA, form their own country rendering the expropriation invalid. Then get Trump to officially recognize their new country and sell them any munitions they want to defend themselves.

Coincidently, the Boers used to equate themselves with the Israelites...
 
Yeah, because when it comes to refugees we -

If we were going to get a moratorium I would support it, but since they are going to let in a certain number of "refugees" then it might as well be the Boers who are closer to our culture and are actually in danger of being genocided.
 
Id rather they declare their independence from SA, form their own country rendering the expropriation invalid. Then get Trump to officially recognize their new country and sell them any munitions they want to defend themselves.

That would be better, I have said before that they should have divided SA, but I don't see it happening.
 
Hopefully they can find a way to stay. If they have to leave, Holland seems like it should be the first choice, maybe the UK. That being said, there was a lot of migration to the US from SA back in the 90s.

While not a fan of putting people in the front of the immigration line because "it's for the (refugee) children!", if one does subscribe to refugee priority, this would be a case that would probably qualify.

Better them than other "refugees"
 
Better them than other "refugees"
same way that norwegian immigrants are preferable to shithole country immigrants, amirite? They may be more socialist than 99% of our country, but at least their melanin counts are within the acceptable spectrum
 
same way that norwegian immigrants are preferable to $#@!hole country immigrants, amirite? They may be more socialist than 99% of our country, but at least their melanin counts are within the acceptable spectrum
I would rather not take any new immigrants but the Boers are closer to our culture than those they would replace. (it has NOTHING to do with their skin color, I would say the same thing if they were black and the communists in SA were white as long as they were closer to our culture than the "refugees" they would replace)
 
I would rather not take any new immigrants but the Boers are closer to our culture than those they would replace. (it has NOTHING to do with their skin color, I would say the same thing if they were black and the communists in SA were white as long as they were closer to our culture than the "refugees" they would replace)
You would rather not take any new immigrants? Then don't open your house up to them. Most of the country disagrees with you. What's with this "our culture" bullshit? Why are you so collectivist? You can just admit that ur racist like ur dad drumpf btw
 
Back
Top