Paul seems to be surging in web searchs at the moment.

If you take into account the News Volume Reference, we really seem to be surging in spite of the media.

Of course!

heh
 
Nice to see that Santorum's search volume in Iowa is actually *not* spiking. I guess the Iowans have already seen enough of Rick that there aren't as many of them that feel like they need to look him up.

(edit): Also nice to see that the first page of results when googling "Ron Paul" is all either positive or at least neutral pages (e.g. wikipedia). More than Santorum can say.
 
Last edited:
bbartlog said:
Nice to see that Santorum's search volume in Iowa is actually *not* spiking. I guess the Iowans have already seen enough of Rick that there aren't as many of them that feel like they need to look him up.
Click to expand...


actually it is but not nearly as high as Pauls. I don't know if thats a good thing for Santorum though considering his google problem.
 
6 out of the 10 Google News articles that come up when you search his name are positive. It seems like the racism news cycle is over. And some of the critical articles are very weak in their points as well.
 
The ultra-SoCons googling Santorum will probably freak out... close the browser... and then not vote for him out of guilt.
 
Last edited:
I think part of it has to do with the Kelly Clarkson thing,she has a huge following and her comments are peeking the curiosity of a group that most likely doesn't follow politics
 
Just because you are being searched on google doesn't mean it is a good thing. With the rash of negative comments and hit pieces by the MSM, I don't see it being a good thing.
 
Interesting. In DC most are looking at Gingrich... in fear, likely. In Austin, it's Perry. Everywhere else, it's Ron.
 
jer4liberty said:
Just because you are being searched on google doesn't mean it is a good thing. With the rash of negative comments and hit pieces by the MSM, I don't see it being a good thing.
Click to expand...

Have you actually googled Ron Paul lately? The entire first page is nothing but offical Ron Paul sites. You don't actually see any of those news stories unless you go much deeper or click "News". I'm sure a good amount of people do that, but a large number of people being exposed to information is good.
 
Btw... if you look at the searches for 'Rick Santorum', instead of 'Santorum', you will see that he isn't spiking in searches(at least not significantly).

I don't really think those googling 'Santorum' have serious intentions.
 
Last edited:
braane said:
Btw... if you look at the searches for 'Rick Santorum', instead of 'Santorum', you will see that he isn't spiking in searches.

I don't really think those googling 'Santorum' have serious intentions.
Click to expand...

It is an unusual name, I wouldn't use the first name if I were doing it. I have to use both names with Ron.
 
braane said:
Btw... if you look at the searches for 'Rick Santorum', instead of 'Santorum', you will see that he isn't spiking in searches.

I don't really think those googling 'Santorum' have serious intentions.
Click to expand...

Why would you google Rick Santorum when its easier to type in Santorum and its a farily unique name?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

danbeaulieu
Google Trends: Paul climbing, Gingrich fading.
Replies
5
Views
782
danbeaulieu
danbeaulieu
hazek
Ron on top for the very first time ever
Replies
1
Views
485
The_Ruffneck
T
Elfshadow
Google Trends
Replies
7
Views
1K
ZanZibar
ZanZibar
wgadget
Ron is TAKING OFF on Google Trends...
2
Replies
22
Views
3K
Barrex
Barrex
wgadget
Google Trends South Carolina Last 30 Days:
Replies
12
Views
978
sailingaway
sailingaway
Back
Top