Paul Joseph Watson won't be around much longer.
- Thread starter Lamp
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,492
The ramifications here are huge. This should be a bigger concern for everyone. This is not just about Paul Joseph Watson.
William Tell
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 12,146
FIFY
milgram
Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 683
Ron Paul was just on Contra Krugman. He said he's concerned about how this tech crackdown could affect his ability to reach an audience.
http://contrakrugman.com/ep-100-ron-pauls-guide-to-2017/
http://contrakrugman.com/ep-100-ron-pauls-guide-to-2017/
Schifference
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 7,423
Is RPF hypocritical in regards to free speech? Can I type and call you my ****** or will it be censored?
juleswin
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 14,245
I envy you, you aren't missing much from not ever knowing him.
juleswin
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 14,245
Well, he has a cool british accent(i.e. sounds intelligent), he is articulate and he talks a lot about SJW (aka beats a dead horse really well). Those three qualities alone would get you a boat load of American viewers
r3volution 3.0
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2014
- Messages
- 18,553
...how ever will I sleep through the night?
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,939
This belongs here. Watch dumb and dumber put on display their journalistic skills. If this doesn't convince you that PJW is the shyte, then there s no hope for u
The Alex Jones show used to be interesting when he spent equal time bashing corrupt liberal and conservative politicians. But now that he's become a Trump cheerleader? Infowars really has just become another arm of the National Inquirer. Spending time speculating on whether or not Michelle Obama is a Tranny? Really?
As for the PJWs whining that "Google is a monopoly" (and by extension YouTube)...well...why are you still feeding the monopoly when you can put your videos on DailyMotion? Serious question. Yeah, ya got to be on YouTube to build an audience. But then you can use YouTube to tell your audience "Hey! All of my good stuff is on DailyMotion and there I can actually get paid!" You can even provide a link.
Seriously, whats the point of all of these rants about "YouTube censorship" if nobody is willing to put forward a non government solution to fixing the problem? Or does PJW actually want a government solution?
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
That is in the terms of service.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,492
Exactly. They will not stop with Watson.
The Rebel Poet
Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2013
- Messages
- 1,732
Some Trumptard is whining that he isn't being given as much money as he used to be, and then says that YouTube shouldn't have private property rights. Can someone explain why I should care?
He does make a valid point about how Alphabet and FB and the like have been ignored when it comes to monopoly/anti-trust laws, therefore there's essentially no competition allowed and somewhat negates the notion of private corporations being able to censor. The reasons they have been allowed to become such monopolistic behemoths are obvious though (or they better be by now).
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
You think that 'private' companies funded and run by intelligence agencies should have private property rights?
Lol, some rebel you are.. maybe you should turn in your badge.
Similar threads
