Paul campaign needs to attack amnesty bill, and NAMU now.

[buffalokid777]

Yes, but most people see the CFR as a think-tank with no impact on the government.

That's one of the problems.....

There are multiple instances of the cfr making recommedations and then being soon implemented as policy in the US....including the spp and the current imigration bill.....

People are starting to wake up to certain NGOs, and their effect on US policy.....

The public knows something is wrong in what's going on in goverment......look at approval ratings of congress and bush.......

The smart internet saavy users are able to connect the dots in larger numbers.....

But the MSM only folks aren't since they're spoonfed what to think.....but even despite that, more and more of em are starting to figure out something is really wrong in what's going on in our government.

Ron Paul should definately in the next debate go harder after illegal immigration and point out how Bush through Chertoff is stalling on building the 874 miles of fence he authorized but refuses to build....it will win supporters just like being against staying in Iraq......

 

[winston84]

As far as stopping illegal immigration Tancredo is the poster child for that issue, although from what I've seen the general audience needs to hear more of what RP has to say on that. None of the candidates have touched the NAU, RP has and he needs to keep it up.

 

[Man from La Mancha]

never mind

 

[LibertyEagle]

Ron can make some very strong points on immigration/SPP/NAU and get a number of new converts. However, he's going to need to put together some hard-hitting proof that he can deliver in a very short amount of time. He won't have 10 minutes to explain it.

That's why I think the CFR should be left out of it, at this point. Unless he just mentions the CFR's "Building a North American Community" in passing.