Paul campaign needs to attack amnesty bill, and NAMU now.

paulitics

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
4,173
There are no other credible candidates to speak out against the amnesty bill or NAMU. People are sick of insiders who say one thing and do another. Ron Paul needs to campaign against this and make it his central issue. He is impeccable on this and has never waivered., something RudyMcromsen can't touch. He has 80% of the country agreeing on this issue, and in recent surveys they rank this as the number one issue facing this country today. He can pull democrats and republicans together. I may be wrong, but I am beginning to think he could win the election on this issue. The Iraq war today, is not firing people up as much anymore, and unfortunately the majority of Repubs still disagree on his foreign policy

I know his views on immigration and national sovereignty have been stated, but they are not reaching loudly and clearly enough. We need to organize to get this message out to the mainstream. Once the CFR and NAMU is fully exposed, his other ideas (abolishing the IRS) may seem less radical. But as of now, he can't win talking about fringe ideas alone.
 
By NAMU, are you talking about the North American Union?

You know, there are a lot of people out there who consider any talk about the CFR to be conspiracy talk. If we raise this point, we may just dilute the rest of what we are saying. At this point, is there a dire need to expose the CFR?

If what we're after is trying to get Dr. Paul's stance on amnesty out to the public, maybe we should focus on that and possibly the SPP and it's apparent fast-track in section 413 of the immigration bill. It's easy to pull up a few FOIA docs on Judicial Watch and show how nasty the SPP is. These things are provable.

I may be wrong, but that's my opinion.
 
I absolutely agree, he is missing a wonderful opportunity to win people over to his side.

He is to passive about these critical issues.
 
There is one thing I agree with you, but he shouldn't pull a Tancredo, it will look cheap and shallow. He needs to show why Tancredo, Rudy McRomneyson, et al. are hallow arguments because they want to shut up the borders, but not the reason why they want to come here.

He should be slightly acerbic, argumentative, and agitated. He should look upset and frustrated that the government is not listening to the people who elected them. I believe it will resonate deeply. His typical approach of seeming academic and placid I don't think will get enough attention. He has to get upset with these people.

If those are don't agree with him on foreign policy hear his domestic policy he will win people foreign and domestic. :)
 
Mike:

I agree. My favorite debate was the first one, because I loved seeing the fire come out of his eyes and him raising his voice, while keeping it deep, on a couple of issues. If he would do that on this issue, he would win a lot over. The American people love a show of strength, backed up by wisdom.
 
Immigration could be a winning issue in the South for sure. As a matter of fact, almost ALL Republicans consider immigration more important than the Iraq occupation.
 
I posted about this this morning and the CFR is a reality not a conspiracy theory
upwards of 80 % want the bill stopped S1639=NAU it is an intergration bill not an immigration here is info from the CFR

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf



Here is a database with many links and mapped plans for the NAU The Mexican trucks are allready being used in the USA for what is allready happening including
Air photos for construction and the Kansas city ports that will spilt the entire country Ron Paul has spoken about the NAU publicly for many years and is missing a golden opportunity C-span should be called every morning that is where the old vote is. "THEY WATCH" Because the American people do not want this and if it goes through America is finished. I hope it is stopped now not in the house

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/NAU/
 
"You know, there are a lot of people out there who consider any talk about the CFR to be conspiracy talk. If we raise this point, we may just dilute the rest of what we are saying. At this point, is there a dire need to expose the CFR?"

The CFR news is breaking through now that Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs have millions of listeners/viewers an they discuss it openly.

The reason it should be brought up is that every major candidate but Paul is a CFR member. This will raise the eyebrows of millions of people and will shed the light as to why this shamnesty bill is being steamrolled without the consent of the public. It will put RudyMcRomney in a negative light, and could translate into millions of votes and newly awakened people.

THe elites have shown their cards on this one, and millions of people are wondering what is going on with the blatent lies and secrecy behind the bill.

It is a much harder sale to talk about abolishing dpts like homeland security and dpt of education than to to talk about the nefariousness of this Amnesty bill and special interests behind it. 80% of Americans hate this Bill and want answers to this hijacking of democracy.
 
Spend your time being productive

<Lots of good stuff clipped>
But as of now, he can't win talking about fringe ideas alone.

I'd like to remind everyone that the Ron Paul campaign knows full well what they are doing. Let them do what they do best while we do what we do best. Our job is best described as one of many individuals taking individual action to achieve a shared goal.

Now go out an do something. :)
Suggestion -- get a bumper sticker now and :D donate.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but most people see the CFR as a think-tank with no impact on the government.
 
Back
Top