Patrick Bet-David - Who Is Nick Fuentes?

[Invisible Man]

He started out as a Ron Paul guy.

Was a rising star within YAL until he unwittingly questioned Izrael, after which he was immediately blacklisted.

This series of claims does not have a ring of truth to it at all.

 

[unknown]

 

[Occam's Banana]

Apparently, he's some kind of perverse, half-assed hybridist:

Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis

(Where else do we find that kind of nonsense? Hmmmm ...)

To hell with this guy.

I have about as much use for "Anti-Israel First"ers as I do for "Israel First"ers - which is to say, none at all.

 

[unknown]

This series of claims does not have a ring of truth to it at all.

He's discussed or talked about this many times.

The most recent being during the Tucker interview.

He may be lying, but not sure of the motive.

 

[unknown]

 

[Invisible Man]

He's discussed or talked about this many times.

The most recent being during the Tucker interview.

He may be lying, but not sure of the motive.

Have you really been here this long and you think that Ron Paul is intolerant of people questioning Israel?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Can someone tell me just what the hell the right is actually supposed gain by "giving up on free markets" in order to reconcile or unite with progressive leftists?

More restrictive immigration policy?

Really?

Why?

Just so we can be a nation of white European pinko-commies instead of diverse & multicultural pinko-commies?

IM is right. Fuentes is either a weaselly snake or a useful idiot.

Is Fuentes a conservative? I thought he had pretty left wing views. Is that not correct?

That's not even a hybrid. That's leftwing across the board.

 

[acptulsa]

He's discussed or talked about this many times.

He was never a Ron Paul guy. He played like he was one, despite being a socialist, in order to reinforce the "racist" narrative being sold via the newsletters.

 

[unknown]

Have you really been here this long and you think that Ron Paul is intolerant of people questioning Israel?

Sorry, not blacklisted by Ron Paul.

Blacklisted by Ben Shapiro Inc.

When discussing his political "journey", Nick says he started out as a Ron Paul guy, having little to do with the events that followed.

ETA

The way that I wrote the original comment above wasn't clear.

 

[unknown]

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Wait... didn't the right give up on the free market decades ago??

Yeah, we have already gone far down that path.

Can someone tell me just what the hell the right is actually supposed gain by "giving up on free markets" in order to reconcile or unite with progressive leftists?
...

Based only on that clip, it sounds like Fuentes is engaging in hyperbole when it comes to "giving up on free markets".

It's already a done deal and advocating for a social safety net and some kind of healthcare help is not a real concession. It's more like the status quo.

What has he really offered? Is he just proposing that libertarians and free market advocates stop preaching about how a return to free markets would be a solution to many of our current govt created problems?

But granted, I don't have much other info on where he stands on "capitalism".

I do know that many complaints about "capitalism" are really about crony corporatism, as opposed to actual free markets.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Based only on that clip, it sounds like Fuentes is engaging in hyperbole when it comes to "giving up on free markets".

It's already a done deal and advocating for a social safety net and some kind of healthcare help is not a real concession. It's more like the status quo.

What has he really offered? Is he just proposing that libertarians and free market advocates stop preaching about how a return to free markets would be a solution to many of our current govt created problems?

Either way, it's a trap that concedes far too much.

Whether it's "free markets" or "racism" or "fairness" or whatever, allowing pinko-progressive leftists to frame the terms is a truncheon they will always end up (or even start out) beating you over the head with.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Either way, it's a trap that concedes far too much.

Whether it's "free markets" or "racism" or "fairness" or whatever, allowing pinko-progressive leftists to frame the terms is a truncheon they will always end up (or even start out) beating you over the head with.

After consideration, Fuentes may be on to something.

I will be willing to drop my demands to end the Fed and abolish income taxes, if in exchange, I get to decide on everything else...

 

[unknown]

 

[jmdrake]

I take it this is the sort of milktoast softball question that Nick Fuentes was wanting from Candace Owens? How about:

"Nick Fuentes, do you still stand by your statement that black people inherently have a lower IQ than white people?"
"Nick Fuentes, do you still believe the lie there was no writing or two story buildings or wheels in sub Saharan Africa before Europeans? Because I have the documents to disprove that lie right now."
"Nick Fuentes, are you still against race mixing?"
"Nick Fuentes, since you openly said you are against race mixing, why did you criticize Vivek Ramaswamy for marrying another Indian?"

But at this point, we all know that Steven Crower really wanted to get to sweet bottom of this pinnaple upsidedown cake of an interview "Nick Fuentes do you disavow the Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories that are wrecking the right currently?"

 

[unknown]