Oregon man to Obama: 'Please come arrest me' for sending Edward Snowden bitcoin

muh_roads

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
6,566
The fight has begun. Will you join the fight? Will you stand up for economic freedom and monetary competition?

-------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-n...f/2015/04/oregon_man_to_obama_please_com.html Oregon man to Obama: 'Please come arrest me' for sending Edward Snowden bitcoin

17427345-mmmain.jpg

President Obama was in Utah on Friday, and Kristopher Ives was in Oregon asking him to "come arrest me." (Rick Bowmer/AP, courtesy of Kristopher Ives)

Print Email
By Bryan Denson | The Oregonian/OregonLive
Email the author | Follow on Twitter

on April 03, 2015 at 12:55 PM, updated April 03, 2015 at 5:05 PM

An Oregon software programmer is publicly taunting President Obama to come arrest him after he openly defied an executive order that appears to prohibit Americans from supplying cyber-currency to Edward Snowden.

Kristopher Ives, who lives in Lafeyette, sent Snowden about 33 cents worth of bitcoin in defiance of the presidential order.

"It's not much but it's the principle of the matter," Ives wrote on the social networking and news site Reddit: "Please come arrest me. I live in Oregon and my name is Kristopher Ives and you can reach me at 503-383-1047."

Ives told The Oregonian on Friday that he was on Reddit on Wednesday, April 1, when news of Obama's executive order hit the Internet.

At first, he thought it might be an April Fools' Day prank.

"I don't want to play the tin foil-hat person," he said, "but it just seemed so odd to (sign an executive order) on April Fools."

So the 28-year-old self-professed "nerd and gamer" hunted up the executive order on the Federal Register. And there it was.

The order - "Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities" - struck Ives and many other observers as a way to stop Americans from sending Snowden bitcoin.

Edward Snowden, you'll recall, is the former National Security Agency contractor who walked off with troves of classified files in 2013 and leaked them to journalists. Snowden fled to Moscow, where he was granted temporary asylum.

The public is divided on Snowden, who is characterized as a turncoat by the U.S. government, which has charged him with espionage. Snowden supporters describe him as a hero who blew the whistle on -- among other things -- a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order that allowed the NSA to collect the telephone data of millions of ordinary Americans.

Ives falls into the Snowden-as-hero camp.

He said in Friday's interview that he thought Snowden was this generation's Mark Felt, the FBI official known as "Deep Throat" who leaked information about the Watergate scandal to The Washington Post. President Richard M. Nixon resigned amid those revelations.

Ives believes that the executive order prohibits Americans from sending bitcoin to Snowden's relief fund, and he's not alone. The business technology website ZDNet published a piece Friday noting that the online community has seized on the loose wording of the presidential order and is riled up because it "effectively rules out donations to Edward Snowden."

"In a post on Reddit's Bitcoin subreddit, members pledged to donate to the whistleblower's relief fund, despite the wording of the new executive order suggesting that doing so was illegal," ZDNet noted.

While many people are convinced the executive order forbids sending bitcoin to Snowden, that seems unlikely at present, according to a published account on Motherboard.

Ives said that he made his contribution to the Snowden fund knowing that the penalty for violating the executive order was the potential seizure of his property.

He noted that he's not alone: So far, Ives said, nearly 1,000 donations valued at $46,342.09 in U.S. dollars have poured into Snowden's Bitcoin "wallet" since the executive order was signed on Wednesday.

-- Bryan Denson
[email protected]
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a good opportunity for a Bitcoin money bomb

Agreed.

Anyone know what Snowden's BTC wallet address is? I would love to see a million people send the guy a buck's worth of Bitcoin. It would make a real nice counterpoint statement to that stupid executive order.
 
anteup_onpage.jpg


How about we convert this topic into an epicmegathread RPF activist effort?

Sponsor a Snowden Bitcoin Protester!


If you're new to bitcoin; have no bitcoins...

and you are the first person to post a bitcoin address,

I will send you 0.004 BTC ($1.00) if you pledge to donate at least half to Snowden here:

1snowqQP5VmZgU47i5AWwz9fsgHQg94Fa





I pledge to sponsor the first new-to-bitcoin Snowden supporter.



Do we have a second sponsor?

A first supporter?
 
Last edited:
Do they even need an executive order to make that illegal? I thought it was already illegal, to send money to known terrorists.
 
From a link in the article: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/yo...tcoins-to-edward-snowden?utm_source=mbtwitter

You Probably Won't Get Sanctioned for Donating Bitcoins to Edward Snowden

That doesn't seem very likely—at least not right now. But Obama's mandate is indeed quite vague about who it can punish and for what kinds of “cyber” conduct.

The executive order (which is made under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act) directs the Department of the Treasury to sanction anyone outside the US “directly or indirectly” involved in “cyber-enabled activities … that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States.”

Among other things, it includes those “causing a significant misappropriation of funds or economic resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain,” and anyone receiving or benefiting from “trade secrets misappropriated through cyber-enabled means.”

But even supposing Snowden can get sanctioned under the order, it would require a decision from the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General. So far, the only hacking-related sanctions the US has imposed have been on North Korean officials for their alleged role in the hack of Sony Pictures last December.
 
Back
Top