Official Electronic Voting Machine Thread

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,995
So I've been kicking around a lot of ideas about electronic voting machines. It's been confirmed that there have been problems this cycle with the Dominion voting software and possibly other software. From the "glitch" in Michigan (excuse me "human error") that flipped votes to Biden to "Sharpie gate" in Arizona.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/0...ty-tallied-6000-republican-votes-as-democrat/

Even stories "debunking" the "glitch" admit that votes got flipped but calling it "human error."

https://gizmodo.com/no-theres-isnt-a-glitch-in-michigan-election-softwar-1845607896

Newsflah. Every time a computer doesn't do what it is supposed to it's human error. Programmers are human after all. The "human error" with the Michigan voting machines is supposed to be an update that wasn't done. But....why should voting software need an update and what kind of update would flip votes?

This is NOT a partisan issue as Democrats were concerned about e-Voting in 2004.

http://www.uncountedthemovie.com/trailer.html



But now that it's Trump winning the roles are reversed and republicans are concerned about the electronic voting machines.

Anyway, I want a clean thread to put information about this single issue. Please don't put unrelated issues in here like late submitted mail in votes UNLESS they are also connected to an electronic voting machine problem. (Reports of ballots being run through twice are relevant as that is something a well designed voting machine should be able to fix). And spare me the "Well the problem isn't big enough to flip the election" arguments! ONE wrongly cast vote because of computer hardware / software s too many. And that argument smacks of circular reasoning. "Don't look for voting problems until there are enough voting problems to overturn the election."

By the way, anyone who has any doubt that voter fraud has happened at least to some degree should watch this video.



Ultimately all voting software needs to be required to be open source. And images from all elections should be available online. It should be possible for anyone to participate in a hand recount from their home.
 
Adam Laxalt interview with Shannon Bream

“We’ve spoken to AI and Computer Vision experts on this, and they have told us that the registrar reduced the signature verification standard to 40%,” said Laxalt. Bream was sure to explain this in layman’s terms for the viewers. For those who are unfamiliar with the process, it is simpler than you may have realized.

The people who are responsible for controlling these machines that read the voting signatures turned down the settings so that more ballot signatures could be accepted. It’s a clear violation of protocol.
...
https://fellowamericandaily.com/vid...-verification-manually-for-over-200000-votes/

He also says in the interview that the resolution of signatures on file are not high enough to adequately use the matching software.

A 40% verification setting with matching software is a complete joke.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OuLJrrrxFk

From another thread:

Yep, huge differences depending upon how the signature is obtained.

Lol. There’s an ad for Gartner at the bottom of the page. They are a big player in this space. Being familiar with this type of matching software, it is by no means perfect. Usually there will multiple parameters set that determine how the matching will be done, for example what confidence code or percentage constitutes a match. While you might think that 80% match is pretty good, it’s not. I would like to see what this software accepted and rejected.
 
Back
Top