jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,995
2 mentions is the same as 1?
What do you think Pelosi thought Trump "admitted" when he called for China to investigate the Bidens?
2 mentions is the same as 1?
She didn't say that either. Keep lying.
What do you think Pelosi thought Trump "admitted" when he called for China to investigate the Bidens?
exactly that, that he wanted Bidens investigated bu Ukraine, doesn't mean it was on a transcribed phone call.
also, trump admitting it, regardless of what he was admitting to, would mean it's additional evidence to whatever was available, so again, you cant prove she ever said the call was sufficient evidence
The fact that Trump wanted an investigation on the Biden's is the evidence on the Trump phone call.
It's not additional evidence of anything new. It's the same evidence.
What is missing in Trump's "admission" in his comments to China is 1) was there a quid pro quo and
2) did he think there was real corruption with regards to the Bidens? Actually the China comment goes to "Trump felt the Bidens are really corrupt" which weakens the case for impeachment.
It's additional, unless you're a liar
1. China isn't Ukraine
2. The phone call didn't say investigate Bidens. so asking for investigation is a new ask.
3. Unless it's an admission of something that never happened, in which case, it's still new evidence, or an admission.
I said it was not additional evidence of anything new. But I suppose I should add new and relevant because you are too stupid to understand that relevant was implied.
Not relevant.
Not relevant.
Not relevant.