NH election fraud! Ron Paul looses 4,900 votes!

Just to cover my bases here -- and I know there's spreadsheets and matrixes ad nauseum all over the place, but has there been any kind of correlation drawn between the demographics in all the disputed places that prove there should not have been any such discrepancy?

I just don't want some "expert" to come back and throw it back in our faces and remove all credibility to our claims going forward.
 
That article states that Ron Paul's hand counted ballots came to 9.2%, not the 15% that we've seen mentioned on this forum and at dailypaul.com.

We need to see accurate sources for these claims.

If that 15% (handcount) v 7.1% (diebold) is true then an investigation would seem to be required. If that handcount number exceeds a sample of over 5,000 then the statistical probability of getting 7.1% in the rest of the state would be miniscule.
 
i HOPE THE PEOPLE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RIOT FOR A RIGHTEOUS COUNT....COME ON nh....DO IT....DEMAND IT! RIOT FOR IT!

MAYBE SOMEONE AT THE UNIVERSITIES THERE CAN START UP A RIOT OVER THIS....WE NEED RIOTING BEFORE THEY TAKE US SERIOUS!
 
Lucid American said:
Just to cover my bases here -- and I know there's spreadsheets and matrixes ad nauseum all over the place, but has there been any kind of correlation drawn between the demographics in all the disputed places that prove there should not have been any such discrepancy?

I just don't want some "expert" to come back and throw it back in our faces and remove all credibility to our claims going forward.
Click to expand...

QFT. Ron Paul supporters are frustratingly unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe the majority of Americans don't like Dr. Paul...why does everything need to be some kind of conspiracy?
 
Ron LOL said:
QFT. Ron Paul supporters are frustratingly unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe the majority of Americans don't like Dr. Paul...why does everything need to be some kind of conspiracy?
Click to expand...

I'm perfectly willing to accept that.

I'm also willing to accept the fact that machines that have proprietary source code that is secret and made by a company with ties to government counts votes in elections and there may be dirty tricks going on.

All votes should be heavily scrutinized and being concerned about someone messing with votes is completely healthy and logical.
 
Last edited:
for crying out loud why the hell do we even need to be using statistics to count to 10! If even a sliver of this is true its an outrage!

are we living at the dawn of civilization or the information age!
 
THE MACHINES NEED TO BE COMPLETELY DONE AWAY WITH AND WE NEED ZERO ELECTRONICS INVOLVED AND ONLY PAPER HAND COUNTED BALLOTS to preserve the integrity of the vote!
 
I dont see anywhere, where RON PAUL has lost 4,900 VOTES..

Can somebody help me find this>
 
what can we do? Somebody tell me. Who are we to fight the big establishment out there... this sounds discouraging but I really cannot see what alternatives we have except to swallow this pill. :(
 
The bigger discrepancy is the Clinton / Obama count. She won the electronic count with 40.121% compared to his 35.756%. In the paper count, he won with 38.785% compared to her 34.703%.
 
quantized said:
what can we do? Somebody tell me. Who are we to fight the big establishment out there... this sounds discouraging but I really cannot see what alternatives we have except to swallow this pill. :(
Click to expand...

"hannitize" it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dannno
Ron Paul UT Congressional Candidate Primary Race Destined For Recount
Replies
0
Views
218
dannno
dannno
Brian4Liberty
Biden Election Strategy: ‘Let’s Fight Three Wars at Once!’
Replies
3
Views
2K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Brian4Liberty
Ron Paul Institute (RPI) for Peace and Prosperity Conference 2024
Replies
7
Views
8K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
W
Ron Paul: A New Covid ‘Variant’ … Just in Time for Election Season!
Replies
0
Views
583
WisconsinLiberty
W
Occam's Banana
The "Giuliani Moment"
Replies
6
Views
2K
Intrepid
Intrepid
Back
Top