NASA Concept Says Screw Mars, Let's Go Live Like Gods on Venus [VIDEO]

Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
21,101
http://www.designntrend.com/article...crew-mars-lets-go-live-like-gods-on-venus.htm

live-on-venus.jpg

Despite the fact that planet Venus is so hot that a human would melt in it, NASA believes that mankind will be able to live in cloud cities in Venus' atmosphere.

Although the planet resembles something out of Dante's Inferno, it is nonetheless potentially stable for the fact that there is no air on the planet. This would make it easier to create floating cloud cities 50km above the planet's surface.

Researchers found that at that height, conditions would resemble Earth, like gravity and temperature, which they deem would sit at around 75 degrees Fahrenheit. The project, called HACOC (or High Altitude Venus Operational Concept) is just an idea.



Venus' skies compared to its surface are pretty pleasant. A few landers have made attempts to land on the surface of Venus but did not last very long before succumbing to the extreme conditions and boiling to a melt.

Chris Jones, of NASA, and colleagues revealed a five-phase plan to Evan Ackerman at IEEE Spectrum detailing how the project would initiate:

A robot would be dispatched to study the environment for any surprises. Afterwards, NASA would send a manned mission to orbit the planet. Depending on the success of the orbit, the crew would then sit on the planet's atmosphere and float among the clouds for a month. Eventually, more crews would be sent. The success of these four phases would then finally lead to the creation of floating cities on Venus.

Venus is much closer to Earth than Mars. It would only take 440 days for a mission to go and come back from Venus.

"If you did Venus first, you could get a leg up on advancing those technologies and those capabilities ahead of doing a human-scale Mars mission. It's a chance to do a practice run, if you will, of going to Mars," Dale Arney, another member of the HAVOC team, told Ackerman.

"Given that Venus's upper atmosphere is a fairly hospitable destination, we think it can play a role in humanity's future in space," Arney told Ackerman.

-t
 
Researchers found that at that height, conditions would resemble Earth, like gravity and temperature, which they deem would sit at around 75 degrees Fahrenheit. The project, called HACOC (or High Altitude Venus Operational Concept) is just an idea.

Except, you know, there's no oxygen.
 
Except, you know, there's no oxygen.

The atmosphere of Venus is composed mainly of carbon dioxide, along with a small amount of nitrogen and other trace elements.

What do plants breath/eat?
And what is their waste product?

Water is likely to be the main bottleneck.

-t
 
The atmosphere of Venus is composed mainly of carbon dioxide, along with a small amount of nitrogen and other trace elements.

What do plants breath/eat?
And what is their waste product?

Water is likely to be the main bottleneck.

-t

Plants also need oxygen for metabolism.
Oxygen levels around 21% are required...too much you're dead...too little you're dead. Same for CO2. That would take millions of year if it were even possible at all.
 
Sounds girly.

Depends. Are the natives like this...

latest
 
Last edited:
Need an interplanetary air transfer system. Suck off excess Venus atmosphere deposit on mars, repeat for 200 years non-stop. Now, have two more planets to populate with insane mutant monkeys.
 
From what I understand the atmosphere is very thick, thus a high pressure on the surface. it would aid the weight of floating platforms.
 
There are chemical reactions that can turn co2 into c and breathable o2. Just takes energy, but with a nuclear reactor it should be no probelm, just like turning h2o into breathable o2 aboard submarines. Over time, in fact this reaction would reduce the co2 concentrations and make the surface more inhabitable
 
There are chemical reactions that can turn co2 into c and breathable o2. Just takes energy, but with a nuclear reactor it should be no probelm, just like turning h2o into breathable o2 aboard submarines. Over time, in fact this reaction would reduce the co2 concentrations and make the surface more inhabitable


too much atmospheric pressure. though removing carbon could help.... vegetation is the best method of breaking down CO2.
 
You would also have to account for increased UV radiation because 1) there's no ozone layer and 2) you're 30 million miles closer to the Sun.
 
You would also have to account for increased UV radiation because 1) there's no ozone layer and 2) you're 30 million miles closer to the Sun.

So close to the real problem.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus#Magnetic_field_and_core
In 1967, Venera 4 found the Venusian magnetic field to be much weaker than that of Earth. This magnetic field is induced by an interaction between the ionosphere and the solar wind, rather than by an internal dynamo in the core like the one inside Earth. Venus's small induced magnetosphere provides negligible protection to the atmosphere against cosmic radiation.


The real reason why none of these ideas are going to happen is because cosmic radiation will simply fry any living thing exposed to it, including plants.

When you come up with a team of astronauts and a bunch of plants that can thrive inside of a running microwave, then we can start to entertain these ideas.
 
Back
Top