Mueller's Russia Indictments: Covering Up For The Deep State? - Ron Paul Liberty Report

[bunklocoempire]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ueMtEmdxFu87/
(VIDEO - SPKOUT/BitChute is an alternative to YouTube)

Mueller's Russia Indictments: Covering Up For The Deep State?
Video Monday, February 19, 2018 Ron Paul and Daniel McAdams
Written by Daniel McAdams
Thirteen Russians and three Russian entities have been indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and accused of interference in the 2016 US elections. They were not agents of the state, at least according to the indictment. They were private citizens. So why do it? Perhaps it was just a commercial "click-bait" venture? But one thing is sure: no one is talking about the FBI FISA deception or about the real foreign collusion in the election, which is the Hillary campaign collusion with "former" British spy Christopher Steele to produce information to undermine support for Donald Trump. It's a win-win for the deep state. Tune in to today's Liberty Report for more:
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...a-indictments-covering-up-for-the-deep-state/
http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com...ia-indictments-covering-up-for-the-deep-state

Copyright © 2018 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

 

[devil21]

Most forget that same Mueller was instrumental in whitewashing 9/11 as FBI Director. Why anybody trusts him now is beyond me.

 

[timosman]

 

[Republicanguy]

There is no deep state.

 

[Swordsmyth]

There is no deep state.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

The beginning was very interesting. Did anyone watch? Daniel mentioned that the whole 13 Russian indictment may have been lifted from a previous media report from Radio Free Europe.

Was this whole indictment mostly phony just like the infamous Steele Dossier? Did they do it again?

 

[timosman]

The beginning was very interesting. Did anyone watch? Daniel mentioned that the whole 13 Russian indictment may have been lifted from a previous media report from Radio Free Europe.

Was this whole indictment mostly phony just like the infamous Steele Dossier? Did they do it again?

The RFE report translated - https://archive.fo/LBmx1

 

[dannno]

There is no deep state.

Ron Paul has more experience in DC than you and he says there is a deep state, what makes you such an expert?

 

[devil21]

The beginning was very interesting. Did anyone watch? Daniel mentioned that the whole 13 Russian indictment may have been lifted from a previous media report from Radio Free Europe.

Was this whole indictment mostly phony just like the infamous Steele Dossier? Did they do it again?

Lucky number 13 and those indicted (assuming they even exist) or doing the indicting will obviously never have to follow through on any of it since Russia does not extradite to the USA.

 

[acptulsa]

Lucky number 13 and those indicted (assuming they even exist) or doing the indicting will obviously never have to follow through on any of it since Russia does not extradite to the USA.

The media will follow through. The media will keep talking about them until there aren't 13 Americans who remember Nunes' name. But the FBI still did more to 'ratfuck' (as Nixon's hatchet boys called it) the last election than Russia could ever hope to do.

 

[dannno]

 

[acptulsa]

So, I managed to make it six and a half minutes in. And I heard him...

1. Say that the fact that these particular indictments don't allege collusion with Trump means there was none.

2. Say that these groups saying Clinton advocated Sharia Law for America was actually done in support of Clinton.

3. Talking slowly in words of two syllables or less, and pausing more often than an A.M.E. pastor, as though talking to third graders.

Does it get better? Does he ever stop insulting my intelligence? Because I can't take any more of that shit.

 

[dannno]

So, I managed to make it six and a half minutes in. And I heard him...

1. Say that the fact that these particular indictments don't allege collusion with Trump means there was none.

Pretty sure he was editorializing when he said there was none and you are mixing things up.

2. Say that these groups saying Clinton advocated Sharia Law for America was actually done in support of Clinton.

He did not say THAT, what he said was that some of the trolls were pro-black lives matter, some were pro-Clinton, some were pro-Bernie, they were trolls from all over the political spectrum, including pro-Trump. What he said was that Russia is trying to help divide and conquer, but the left is doing more towards than end than the Russians.

3. Talking slowly in words of two syllables or less, and pausing more often than an A.M.E. pastor, as though talking to third graders.

Uh huh You mean when he was READING THE INDICTMENT ITSELF?? He doesn't choose the words lol he just reads them..


Nice try.

 

[acptulsa]

Pretty sure he was editorializing when he said there was none and you are mixing things up.

I said he offered the fact that the indictments didn't say Trump was involved as proof Trump wasn't involved. Which is editorializing, yes. And is also stupid.

He did not say THAT, what he said was that some of the trolls were pro-black lives matter, some were pro-Clinton, some were pro-Bernie, they were trolls from all over the political spectrum, including pro-Trump. What he said was that Russia is trying to help divide and conquer, but the left is doing more towards than end than the Russians.

Ah, but he did say that. Rewrite him to make him sound rational all you want. It's too late, you posted the video of him saying what he said.

Uh huh You mean when he was READING THE INDICTMENT ITSELF?? He doesn't choose the words lol he just reads them..

Nice try.

He can't read the indictment in words of two syllables or less, at a third grade level. Nice try yourself.

 

[dannno]

I said he offered the fact that the indictments didn't say Trump was involved as proof Trump wasn't involved. Which is editorializing, yes. And is also stupid.

I disagree with your assessment. I say he believes Trump wasn't involved, and used the indictment as further evidence as opposed to proof. I listen to him a lot more than you, I've listened to him for probably dozens of hours, you've listened to him for 6 minutes..

Ah, but he did say that. Rewrite him to make him sound rational all you want. It's too late, you posted the video of him saying what he said.

I recall him saying exactly that, I don't recall him saying what you said AT ALL.

He can't read the indictment in words of two syllables or less, at a third grade level. Nice try yourself.

He wasn't talking like you said he was unless he was reading the indictment. I skimmed through the video, whenever he started doing that he was reading the indictment.

You are overly judgmental and make silly posts that lack depth.

 

[acptulsa]

You are overly judgmental...

You post this garbage before a discriminating audience, then accuse us of discrimination.

Very SJW of you. Or, at least, it's some brand or another of passive aggression.

 

[dannno]

You post this garbage before a discriminating audience, then accuse us of discrimination.

Very SJW of you. Or, at least, it's some brand or another of passive aggression.

Mike Cernovich is awesome, he is an attorney and is much smarter than you are. You're being completely ridiculous and none of your complaints have any merit to them.

 

[acptulsa]

Mike Cernovich is awesome, he is an attorney and is much smarter than you are. You're being completely ridiculous and none of your complaints have any merit to them.

He can be smarter than me and still insult my intelligence. And you say my comments are without merit, but I don't see any of the smart people around here helping you defend that tripe.

 

[dannno]

One interesting thing Cernovich says is that it would be interesting if other countries started suing the US for our involvement in trolling their social media during election time.

 

[dannno]

He can be smarter than me and still insult my intelligence. And you say my comments are without merit, but I don't see any of the smart people around here helping you defend that tripe.

I'm not here for a popularity contest, I'm here to do what is right. And Cerno gets it right, he gets good scoops and has a lot of good insider info.

You admitted you've only listened to him for 6 minutes. You know nothing about him. And considering the internet is full of lies about him, I don't expect you to really ever know much about him that is actually true.