Liberty Star
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,118
2/3rd avoid it, pretty amazing:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080812/ap_on_bi_ge/corporations_income_tax
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080812/ap_on_bi_ge/corporations_income_tax
Good, now we just need 2/3 of individuals to stop paying federal income taxes
We could cut the income tax completely if the 2/3 of these companies paid up...
Just a thought.
The GAO study did not investigate why corporations weren't paying federal income taxes or corporate taxes and it did not identify any corporations by name. It said companies may escape paying such taxes due to operating losses or because of tax credits.
I don't know the numbers, but I'll take your word for it. While a corporate income tax is certainly preferable to a personal one, I still don't want either.
There always were corporate taxes before the federal income tax was created wasn't there?
I have to side with Kade on this one.
I wasn't disagreeing with him, so I'm not sure why you are taking a side.
Corporate taxes discourage production. They are not good for anyoney. When a company takes a loss, they lose 100% of that loss. When a company makes a profit, they only get to keep (pulled this number out of my ass) 75% of the profit. The odds are stacked against them.
The Top sucks from the Bottom until the bottom implodes from debt and the Top regains what it lent to the bottom under the guise of "ownership"("Title") when the homage(taxes) to the King can't be repaid. It's the reality of modern economic slave society.
The missing statistic is how many of these "corporations" are true productive businesses, and how many are purely tax shelters?
Isn't that what Enron was doing? Creating false off-shore corporations to move money around to?
Enron was doing all kinds of creative accounting. A lot of it was meant to make their books look better than they really were.
Is it reasonable and safe to assume that ALMOST all of this company tax AVOIDANCE is totally and completely "legal" (so called )?