Diggerjr01
Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2011
- Messages
- 13
--
--
--
Last edited:
william t still, the narrator, admits that 'money masters' is full of inaccuracies and outright fabrications
I disagree. People need to be free to trade with whatever they choose. Governments can require payments to them in whatever form they decide. Gold and silver is limited in supply and that is exactly why they were the preferred choice for money in the past and will likely be the most preferred form of money in the future. There is plenty of money in the world for trade. Paper is not valuable. Time will tell.Pray tell, what are the inaccuracies and fabrications? I'm not saying that none exist, I just want to hear what the argument is so I can research it myself.
The Money Masters video does not conclude that people must remain slaves to the bankers. Nothing of the kind. You don't even need banks with their plan, just a government controlled central bank that adds currency when necessary to stop deflation as goods and services grow.
We have to have money. The government printing a debt free fiat currency is absolutely allowed. If we didn't do that, there wouldn't be enough gold and silver to use as money. Gold and silver are both limited in supply. Once goods and services outweigh the amount of gold and silver, then we'll have massive money contraction naturally as more goods and services grow and more people are born. The only way to combat this is a fiat currency. But fiat currency should be regulated so as to keep the same buying power continually, without deflation nor inflation.
A narrator is no authority. That's a hired performer. Also, men can be bought. Especially when we are dealing with as much money as we are talking about.
Pray tell, what are the inaccuracies and fabrications? I'm not saying that none exist, I just want to hear what the argument is so I can research it myself.
You don't even need banks with their plan, just a government controlled central bank that adds currency when necessary to stop deflation as goods and services grow.
In short, it doesn’t matter what the money
supply may be; every M will be just as good as any other for performing
its cash balance exchange function. Page 45, The Mystery of Banking, MURRAY N. ROTHBARD
Pray tell, what are the inaccuracies and fabrications? I'm not saying that none exist, I just want to hear what the argument is so I can research it myself.
The Money Masters video does not conclude that people must remain slaves to the bankers. Nothing of the kind. You don't even need banks with their plan, just a government controlled central bank that adds currency when necessary to stop deflation as goods and services grow.
We have to have money. The government printing a debt free fiat currency is absolutely allowed. If we didn't do that, there wouldn't be enough gold and silver to use as money. Gold and silver are both limited in supply. Once goods and services outweigh the amount of gold and silver, then we'll have massive money contraction naturally as more goods and services grow and more people are born. The only way to combat this is a fiat currency. But fiat currency should be regulated so as to keep the same buying power continually, without deflation nor inflation.
Also I hear arguments that coins are okay but bills are not. There is no difference between the two if nothing backs it.
A bronze coin has not much intrinsic value. The coins we have today cannot be melted down and sold for anything. They only have value as a coin and only that we give value to them.
But that is all that is needed in order for trade to be facilitated.
I suggest you read the book What Has Government Done To Our Money? You can read it free online. It explains why a central banks and fiat currencies are unnecessary, why it doesn't matter that gold and silver are limited in supply, and why they'll always be valuable.
Pray tell, what are the inaccuracies and fabrications? I'm not saying that none exist, I just want to hear what the argument is so I can research it myself.
The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)
I disagree. People need to be free to trade with whatever they choose. Governments can require payments to them in whatever form they decide. Gold and silver is limited in supply and that is exactly why they were the preferred choice for money in the past and will likely be the most preferred form of money in the future. There is plenty of money in the world for trade. Paper is not valuable. Time will tell.
Anyone who prints money is counterfeiting. Counterfeiting is immoral.
Whatever you decide is money is money. Whether it is gold, silver or paper. But gold and silver are a limited supply. What happens when there is more trading to do then gold or silver exists? That is when unemployment happens.
They explain how money works.
they explain from a highly politically biased viewpoint
The supply of money doesn't matter in the long run, its a universally accepted economic fact.
griffin is widely regarded as a shady character
i didn't mention anything about the money supply