Missouri Police Report: RP supporters, Libertarians, anti-NWO movement are TERRORISTS

If legit, WOW....

scan0023.jpg


The only thing is, this memo is full of very obvious typos and grammatical errors. It's possible that they slipped past editors, but also makes me wonder about the authenticity.
 
Is this confirmed ? If so, they might as well be full throttle azzhats and just put the US Constitution on their bloody flyers. Who elected these people ?
I refuse to believe all the Police are in on this BS. What is our Military saying about this, they donated alot of moneys to Ron Paul too. LMAO
 
I don't know but it seems authentic, and there is precedent - I remember an FBI report that included 'defenders of the constitution' as threats. I just finished reading the report and its main targets are militia movements, so at first it seemed maybe the infowars article was over the top, but no - it is grouping people with the following characteristics as possible threats:

- supporters of third parties (specifically mentioned RP, Barr, and Baldwin)
- anti NWO
- anti Federal Reserve (the End the Fed protests specifically were mentioned)
- anticipation of US economic collapse
- uneasiness over possible Constitutional Conention
- anti North American Union
- opposed to Obama's civilian military core
- anti RFID
- believe in state sovereignty
- anti IRS ~ income tax
- anti illegal immigration
- uneasiness over possible marshal law
- display Gadsden Flag or Upside down US Flag
- watchers of Zeitgeist, America: Freedom to Fascism

Every one of those characteristics applies to me (except the flags but people on my digg network display them), and I'll bet at least 50% of the above applies to almost everyone here. This is how they are identifying possible threats.
 
I don't know but it seems authentic, and there is precedent -
It doesnt look authentic to me and the precedent comes from the same source IIRC.

Every one of those characteristics applies to me (except the flags but people on my digg network display them), and I'll bet at least 50% of the above applies to almost everyone here. This is how they are identifying possible threats.

And that Is why it doesn't seem authentic to me. It looks and reads more like something whipped up to implicate their own groups/demographic to incite themselves. Or maybe I just hope that is the case.
 
Gee, they left a toll free number, too?

I'd call them but I am afraid I would get the midnight "knock on the door".

I gotta hope that a lot of policemen know better, like the one that allegedely got this to AJ.
 
I called the toll free number (866-362-6422) and it's legit. The woman who answered said she was aware that a memo was put out implicating Ron Paul and Bob Barr supporters, but that she was working the late shift and would have to take my number and have her supervisor call me tomorrow. I told her no thanks. But she was clearly aware of a growing controversy. She sounded frazzled.
 
It doesnt look authentic to me and the precedent comes from the same source IIRC.



And that Is why it doesn't seem authentic to me. It looks and reads more like something whipped up to implicate their own groups/demographic to incite themselves. Or maybe I just hope that is the case.

No the precedent one from the FBI has been circulated by the JBS for years. That one at least is legit, and frankly not all that terribly different than this one (besides the specific naming of Ron Paul and others) So some of the specifics are more specific, but I would bet this is legit too.

Call the toll free number and ask them.
 
You guys should call it for sure and see if you get the same reaction I got. Ask what that "information center" does.
 
Well, I guess I'm a terrorist by default because Christopher Gadsden is one of my grandfathers and I proudly fly the flag in my backyard. :mad:
 
I called the toll free number (866-362-6422) and it's legit. The woman who answered said she was aware that a memo was put out implicating Ron Paul and Bob Barr supporters, but that she was working the late shift and would have to take my number and have her supervisor call me tomorrow. I told her no thanks. But she was clearly aware of a growing controversy. She sounded frazzled.

Unless Alex covered all his bases...
 
I cannot believe this to be real, it's just "too much", as it were. I don't know. anyone else called the phone #?
 
Back
Top