Milei Launches 'Isaac Accords' To Expand Israeli Influence In Latin America

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,965
News Desk
November 29, 2025


Amid the genocide in Gaza, the Argentine president has turned his country from a staunch critic of Israel to a major supporter.​
Milei.jpg


Argentinian President Javier Milei formally launched the Isaac Accords on 29 November, a new initiative aimed at strengthening political, economic, and cultural cooperation between Israel and Latin America.

Milei announced the initiative following a meeting with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, who visited Buenos Aires on Saturday as part of a regional diplomatic tour.

The Isaac Accords are being promoted in partnership with Washington and are modeled after the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries, including the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco.

Milei said Argentina would serve as a “pioneer” alongside the US to promote the new framework to other Latin American countries, including Uruguay, Panama, and Costa Rica.

Foreign Minister Gideon Saar praised Milei’s love of Judaism and Israel as “sincere, powerful, and moving.”

Before the meeting began, Milei recited the “Shehecheyanu,” a traditional Jewish blessing, and placed a kippah on his head.






Article continues:

 
A sport coat made out of a rainbow flag.

LOL

I keep waiting for @Occam's Banana to reply to one these threads like he said he was going to when he gets around to it. It was like Milei was his all-time hero for a short time but now look what happened 🤣 [all in fun, don't blow a gasket 🤣 ]
 
I keep waiting for @Occam's Banana to reply to one these threads like he said he was going to when he gets around to it. It was like Milei was his all-time hero for a short time but now look what happened 🤣 [all in fun, don't blow a gasket 🤣 ]

:confused:

I have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Of course you don't 😇😂

:up:

I'm not going to play this coyly passive-aggressive game with you.

And I'm not going to indulge your childish attempt to bait me by tagging me, blatantly lying about me having said I was "[going] to reply to one [of] these threads" (I have never said any such thing, and I have no idea what the hell you are talking about), bizarrely and mockingly mischaracterizing what I've said about something (such as that "Milei was [my] all-time hero") - and then disingenuously excusing your bullshit as "just having fun" while preemptively framing and dismissing any reply I might make to your lies and mockery as me just "blow[ing] a gasket".

So go find someone more patient than I am to be obnoxious to.

Have a nice day.
 
I'm not going to play this coyly passive-aggressive game with you.

And I'm not going to indulge your childish attempt to bait me by tagging me, blatantly lying about me having said I was "[going] to reply to one [of] these threads" (I have never said any such thing, and I have no idea what the hell you are talking about), bizarrely and mockingly mischaracterizing what I've said about something (such as that "Milei was [my] all-time hero") - and then disingenuously excusing your bullshit as "just having fun" while preemptively framing and dismissing any reply I might make to your lies and mockery as me just "blow[ing] a gasket".

So go find someone more patient than I am to be obnoxious to.

Have a nice day.


I keep forgetting, guys in these parts can't be guys, they're more temperamental than chicks on the rag. No worries, I won't poke a little fun at you anymore.

Occam,

You haven’t posted in awhile on this topic...
My strongest opinion on the subject is that all the various threads on the subject (there are several) should be merged. I just haven't got around to it, yet....

No need to expand, I'm not interested in your analysis anymore.

You have a nice day as well.
 
I keep forgetting, guys in these parts can't be guys, they're more temperamental than chicks on the rag. No worries, I won't poke a little fun at you anymore.

Right - because "guys" go around claiming another person said a thing he never actually said in order to present themselves as somehow being owed some kind of response from the other person. And if the other person takes exception to being held to account for the thing he never actually said, then he's just being a "temperamental [chick] on the rag". Got it.

(TIL coy passive-aggression is a "guy" thing, and calling out someone's rudely presumptuous and out-of-the-blue BS is a "chick" thing.)

My strongest opinion on the subject is that all the various threads on the subject (there are several) should be merged. I just haven't got around to it, yet....

So that's what you've twisted into some kind of commitment by me "to reply to one [of] these threads"?

Really?

No need to expand, [...]

Expand on what? Your inability to understand the brain-dead obvious difference between me clearly saying "some other already-existing threads about a subject should be merged" and me clearly not saying "I'm going to reply to some other not-yet-existing threads on some other subject"? I'd have thought you wouldn't have needed such a simple thing to be expanded upon, either - but it looks like you actually do.

[...] I'm not interested in your analysis anymore.

Given the false and mocking presumption of the post you tagged me in, I don't see any reason to think you ever were in the first place.

And even if you were, what would be the point (given your misrepresentations of the things I've already said)?
 
Back
Top