McMaster is Probably Not Going to Last Much Longer

dannno

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
65,717
President McMaster? — McMaster to Meet with Trump to Discuss Who is Running the White House

President Trump and his NSA H.R. McMaster have an important meeting scheduled for tomorrow morning. During this meeting they will discuss an important question — Who is President?

#NeverTrump and pro-Iraq war pundit David Frum wishes it were McMaster, whose conduct suggests he agrees with Frum.




Bill Kristol, one of the architects of the Iraq War, also praised McMaster repeatedly.
Trump has becoming increasingly frustrated with “President McMaster.”

McMaster breached chain-of-command protocol by unilaterally appointing Ricky Waddell has his deputy. Before that he attempted to hire a proven fraud, Linda Weissgold (yes, the Benghazi liar), to work at NSC.
In her position at OTA, she was also involved directly in drafting the now infamous Benghazi talking points, which government officials revised heavily to include factually incorrect assessments that stated the attackers were prompted by protests. According to the House Select Committee on Benghazi’s report, Weissgold testified she had changed one such talking point to say that extremists in Benghazi with ties to al Qaeda had been involved in “protests” in the Libyan city, despite the fact that no such protests had occurred there on the day of the attack.
McMaster also overruled Trump on North Korea, leaked fake anti-Bannon articles to the media, and pushed for a ground war in Syria and massive new surge in Afghanistan.


McMaster will likely “fall up” to four-star general.

Trump is not interested more stories about personnel issues, and thus the Pentagon is looking for four-star general positions. The current Vice Chief of Staff of the Army’s tenure is winding to a close, and McMaster is being considered for that role.



National Security Advisor McMaster May Accept Role as Army Vice Chief of Staff, Receive Promotion…
Current NSA H.R. McMaster is under consideration for a promotion to full General, multiple sources with knowledge of…medium.com

Other sources suggest McMaster may replace General John W. Nicholson Jr., the top commander in Afghanistan.
McMaster, for his part, has not enjoyed his role as NSA.

McMaster is an armor officer at heart, and finds the work of the NSA tedious and unrewarding.


He has currently presented five plans to intervene in various parts of the world, including most recently in Venezuela — a plan favored by Dina Habib Powell and Niki Haley.


https://medium.com/@Cernovich/presi...s-who-is-running-the-white-house-f702acaa5be3
 
I know, right? 46dd chess.

Do you have a better strategy? Let's hear it.

Because I'm pretty sure if someone like Ron Paul was elected, they would quite literally execute them, probably before inauguration.

I'm glad to see someone with the long-term goal of outting the deep state, because with the deep state in power I'm not sure it is even possible to reach our goals.

I'm just trying to live in the real world, not some libertarian fantasyland where we just elect someone to give us freedom like some fucking fairy tale. This is a power struggle far beyond your comprehension.

Remember the struggle the founding fathers went through to gain freedom from Britain? Now multiply that times a million. That is what we are up against. So ya, it's going to take some fucking strategy.
 
Last edited:
I think this has been McMaster baiting Trump into firing him and now hes finally gonna do it
 
Do you have a better strategy? Let's hear it.

serveimage
 
Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan the middle-east. Pretty sure that's what Ron would do.

Ok, how would you do that? You do realize they would execute Ron Paul if he got elected right? They wouldn't even allow him to get elected.

Next.
 
When I clicked reply it was the entire post. Then you realized we would have a better strategy and covered thy butt.:o

No, I realized that you guys are largely clueless about how the world works so I would have to fill in a few blanks you guys have in your heads.
 
Ok, how would you do that? You do realize they would execute Ron Paul if he got elected right? They wouldn't even allow him to get elected.

Next.

Why did they "allow" Trump to get elected? Hmmmm? Why don't they just execute him? Perhaps because he is toeing their line? Perhaps because he is exactly what Ron Paul called him out as being before he was elected? And is calling him out now that he has moved forward on his positions?

Next.
 
No, I realized that you guys are largely clueless about how the world works so I would have to fill in a few blanks you guys have in your heads.

No. We know exactly how the world works and how Trump is working with the world.
 
Why did they "allow" Trump to get elected? Hmmmm? Why don't they just execute him? Perhaps because he is toeing their line? Perhaps because he is exactly what Ron Paul called him out as being before he was elected? And is calling him out now that he has moved forward on his positions?

Next.
Apparently Dr Paul is largely clueless and needs dannno to fill in a few blanks in his head.
 
Apparently Dr Paul is largely clueless and needs dannno to fill in a few blanks in his head.

This really should have become the Trump Forums back when Trump threatened to run against Ron Paul if he won the GOP nomination and called Ron incompetent at CPAC in 2011. Just think of all the support we could have garnered for him if we had started back then. :rolleyes:
 
Why did they "allow" Trump to get elected? Hmmmm? Why don't they just execute him? Perhaps because he is toeing their line? Perhaps because he is exactly what Ron Paul called him out as being before he was elected? And is calling him out now that he has moved forward on his positions?

Next.

Well Massie says that Trump's Presidency has largely been an overwhelming success so far. Not only has Trump pushed the ball forward in many areas, he is also moving forcefully in outting the deep state.

Why don't they execute him? Because that would out them even further, and we may end up getting someone like Ron or Rand elected.

Now if we had a big movement behind Rand or Ron, admittedly they would have a hard time assassinating either of them because that would 'out' them as well. But we aren't there right now. Even if we were, it would be difficult to get past all of the election fraud. Maybe some day. It would be highly preferable and a lot less confusing.

I'm all for pointing out and recognizing Trump's flaws, but to actively fight against him is to fight with the deep state. Ron Paul does a fantastic job at recognizing and pointing out Trump's flaws without appearing to be fighting for the deep state.
 
Last edited:
Well Massie says that Trump's Presidency has largely been an overwhelming success so far. Not only has Trump pushed the ball forward in many areas, he is also moving forcefully in outting the deep state.

Why don't they execute him? Because that would out them even further, and we may end up getting someone like Ron or Rand elected.

Now if we had a big movement behind Rand or Ron, admittedly they would have a hard time assassinating either of them because that would 'out' them as well. But we aren't there right now. Even if we were, it would be difficult to get past all of the election fraud. Maybe some day. It would be highly preferable and a lot less confusing.

I'm all for pointing out and recognizing Trump's flaws, but to actively fight against him is to fight with the deep state. Ron Paul does a fantastic job at recognizing and pointing out Trump's flaws without appearing to be fighting for the deep state.

Pretty sure that whatever 46dd chess Trump is playing has you snookered and in danger of check mate.
 
Back
Top