Mark Sanford endorses Cruz for President

[Brian4Liberty]

Ted Cruz earns key endorsement ahead of South Carolina’s crucial Republican primary
By Kevin Boyd | February 19, 2016

Ted Cruz picked up key support Friday when former South Carolina governor and current congressman Mark Sanford endorsed Cruz for president.

According to the Washington Times, Sanford was planning on staying out of the race until the attacks on Cruz escalated, “Mr. Sanford, who had remained out of the race, said he got involved because he was upset at the attacks on Mr. Cruz, whom both Mr. Rubio and Donald Trump have accused of lying during the South Carolina fight.”

“It just struck me that it’s gotten out of bounds,” Sanford said.

Sanford called Cruz the best defender of the Constitution left in the race.

Although Sanford had remained neutral before Friday, he once appeared to be leaning toward Rand Paul. He introduced Paul on his first visit to South Carolina as a presidential candidate back in April.

Sanford joins fellow South Carolina Congressman Jeff Duncan in endorsing Ted Cruz. Trey Gowdy has endorsed Marco Rubio. Mick Mulvaney endorsed Rand Paul before he dropped out the race, but has not endorsed anyone else.

Sanford is considered one of the most libertarian-leaning members of the House along with Congressmen Justin Amash and Thomas Massie, both of whom endorsed Sen. Paul for president early in the primaries.
...
http://rare.us/story/ted-cruz-earns...f-south-carolinas-crucial-republican-primary/

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Add Justin Amash to the Cruz endorsement list...

 

[Anti-Neocon]

I wonder what Walter Jones will do. He said that Trump was his second choice a while back.

 

[RonPaulGeorge&Ringo]

This is some traitorous unConstitutional bullshit, backing an ineligible Canadian for the Presidency.

 

[Anti-Neocon]

This is some traitorous unConstitutional bullshit, backing an ineligible Canadian for the Presidency.

Instead he should back someone who wants to shit all over the Constitution? Yeah they both do but that's not the point. One openly mocks freedom of speech and privacy.

 

[Gh34]

Instead he should back someone who wants to shit all over the Constitution? Yeah they both do but that's not the point. One openly mocks freedom of speech and privacy.

Then remove your tagline, because you support the opposite of what you say there by backing your Bush loving candidate.

 

[Anti-Neocon]

Then remove your tagline, because you support the opposite of what you say there by backing your Bush loving candidate.

I back no one.

But Trump is the most popular here so I make it my mission to expose him for the scum that he is.

 

[Gh34]

I back no one.

But Trump is the most popular here so I make it my mission to expose him for the scum that he is.

Everyone knows what he is. He is a protest vote.

 

[phill4paul]

Everyone knows what he is. He is a protest vote.

No. A protest vote is what I will do when I write in Ron Paul. THAT'S a protest vote.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Take Ted to Bilderberg, Mark.