Lose with Cruz

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

The lose-with-Cruz faction figures it will be easier to reset of the party after a Cruz defeat than in the wake of a Trump disaster.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/opinion/sunday/lose-with-cruz-a-love-story.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-c...ith-cruz-rather-than-face-post-trump-shambles

With Cruz, they’d lose
http://www.economist.com/news/unite...-peddles-self-serving-myth-about-presidential

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/17/rallying-to-ted-cruz-to-lose-the-election/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tells-Trump-Cruz-knock-war-Twitter-wives.html

 

[Jan2017]

Cruz will lose his Senate seat after the fraudulent actions there.
But Reince Priebus never intended Ted Cruz as anything but a wrecking ball for liberty or the Constitution - so RNC wins!

 

[CPUd]

Cruz would do about the same as Mitt in the general election- get the safe GOP states and lose the tossups. The GOP is losing at least 2 Senate races, but they would keep a majority, and candidates like Greg Brannon would have a decent chance to win a general election.

 

[Voluntarist]

xxxxx

 

[CPUd]

Illinois and Wisconsin are the 2 they are going to lose no matter what.

 

[Anti-Neocon]

With Cruz, they’d lose

I've heard something similar before...

 

[FindLiberty]

... a wrecking ball for liberty or the Constitution - so RNC wins!

Yea, both parties win and Liberty loses, like it's been their plan all along...

Too bad it keeps us so distracted from anything more important, like finding real solutions.

 

[Jan2017]

If Cruz (and/or Kasich) could get 351 total of the remaining 848 delegates - only 42% -
then Trump with 739 delegates so far would fall short of a first ballot majority and the GOP nomination.