Look what Tucker did for us on YouTube

[Question_Authority]

Tucker is a true American patriot, and Ron Paul is lucky to have him. Tucker, SHAKE THEM HATERS OFF!

Oh please. For ANYONE to make a comment like "If people knew what Ron Paul stands for they would hate him". Ummm, that is not support. His little reverse psychology thing, if that's what it was, did not go over well AT ALL. No one GOT IT, even Bill Maher.

And he also called ROn Paul popularity a FAD.

Tucker is a F*cker.

 

[kylejack]

Go pass out some slimjims.

 

[Ozwest]

Yes, I agree. Go pass out some slimjims as pennance for this thread.

Bless you my child. HeHe.

 

[ThePieSwindler]

Tucker is not a traitor at all. He spoke the truth, but just didnt use the right words. I dont think what he said *hurt* the campaign per se, and it surely was NOT a sign of tucker giving up on Ron Paul, as he even said he AGREED wit him when Maher said he disagree with RP on some things. He was trying to say truthfully that many liberals would not like alot of the things ron stands for, but it was a critique of liberal progressivism more so than of Ron Paul. Should he have said it the way he said it? No, i dont think so, but was he a "traitor"? Not at all, he was still saying how much he supported Ron Paul. Tucker is an ally in the media, one of our very few, please lets not attack him, please.

 

[Ozwest]

Sure, everyone enjoys the good press, but it's time to grab the swinging donkey meat and put these "show ponys" in their place!

 

[runderwo]

That's the honest truth. The liberals out there that are for gun rights, in favor of abortion, gay marriage, etc, would never support Ron Paul, so on a social level they're polar opposites.

Liberals also want all the entitlements and social programs from the government that Ron Paul wants to take away.

I don't find those things to be in conflict. As long as they recognize that the second amendment IS a right, then the rest of the things you mentioned are taken care of by federalism. The federal government has not the authority, much less the capacity when it comes to entitlements, to take care of all of those wants on a national level. When they're no longer being robbed by the federal government, they can promote socialism in their state legislatures where it's constitutional, and arguably more effective.

 

[chinaCat]

I'm not reading 11 pages, sorry. But My take is simply that. He was stating it how he sees it. Fad, I think Paul is past any "fad" stage now. I dont agree with a lot of his policies. I'm for abortion, for gay marriage. But why do I support paul? becuase I am for states rights, and small government. He doesn't want to outlaw aborition. Well he may, but he knows he cant. He thinks it is a states decision. Just like I think a lot of things should be decided on the state level.

 

[timosman]

 

[Jesse James]

Jon Stewart is a partisan hack. He only attacks Tucker and not the other guy. Nuff said

 

[jct74]

That's a good video, but what is your opinion of the material in the OP (from 9 years ago)? Do you think there is something important there that should be taken note of?

 

[H. E. Panqui]

...ugh...the glib dullard sucker carlson has always been a republican bootlicker...another goddamned fool republican cheerleader who doesn't understand how one dollar originates, yet his foaming gob is frequently working as to the illion dollar economy!!...shaddup, tucker...

...the poster child for the '50 dollar haircuts on 5 dollar heads'....

 

[timosman]

That's a good video, but what is your opinion of the material in the OP (from 9 years ago)? Do you think there is something important there that should be taken note of?

LOL.