Llepard letter to AmySchatz: WSJ

[llepard]

Here is the email I just sent to Ms. Schatz

Dear Ms. Schatz:

Well you pretty much managed to hit all of the negatives and associate Dr. Paul with some pretty unattractive people.

Was it really necessary to include Don Black and Stormfront in an article on his supporters?

Also, the mention of the Ku Klux Klan was a nice touch. I am kind of surprised that you did not find a way to get Hitler’s name in there.

For the record, I am the guy who paid for the USA Today advertisement. I grew up in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I attended public high school. My father (deceased) was a Korean Vet. I have a BA degree from Colgate University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. I have a wife and three young children.

I believe your treatment of Dr. Paul’s supporters in your article was grossly unfair. Obviously you do not understand the message.

That is OK, you will. The message is so powerful that people like you cannot stop it. The internet changes the rules of the game. Think Gutenberg press and reformation. The advertisement in USA Today will become the “Common Sense” of our time.

You can fight it, or join us over on the winning side.

Your choice.

Very sincerely,

Lawrence W. Lepard

 

[LibertyEagle]

Nice job, Lawrence.

 

[constituent]

i think they call that "precision-guided" letter writing don't they?

rock on llepard!

 

[spivey378]

Thank you my friend. I wanted to send you a PM to say thanks, but I will do it here. You are right on with the Common Sense analogy.

Thanks again.

 

[qwerty]

Nice one!

 

[GHoeberX]

Here is the email I just sent to Ms. Schatz

Dear Ms. Schatz:

Well you pretty much managed to hit all of the negatives and associate Dr. Paul with some pretty unattractive people.

Was it really necessary to include Don Black and Stormfront in an article on his supporters?

Also, the mention of the Ku Klux Klan was a nice touch. I am kind of surprised that you did not find a way to get Hitler’s name in there.

For the record, I am the guy who paid for the USA Today advertisement. I grew up in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I attended public high school. My father (deceased) was a Korean Vet. I have a BA degree from Colgate University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. I have a wife and three young children.

I believe your treatment of Dr. Paul’s supporters in your article was grossly unfair. Obviously you do not understand the message.

That is OK, you will. The message is so powerful that people like you cannot stop it. The internet changes the rules of the game. Think Guttenberg press and reformation. The advertisement in USA Today will become the “Common Sense” of our time.

You can fight it, or join us over on the winning side.

Your choice.

Very sincerely,

Lawrence W. Lepard

I approve this message

 

[disciple]

We, Ron Paul's supporters, we love each other, and we will stand by each other.

Take that Ms. Amy

 

[10thAmendmentMan]

Guttenberg 2.0! I like it.

 

[LBT]

Well said Llepard, and so true that Ron Paul is to polical change via the Internet, what Martin Luther was to the Reformation after the invention of the printing press.

The incredible significance of this in world history is something that few have realized.

 

[allyinoh]

Good Job, Lawrence! You just keep going don't you!?

 

[llepard]

Good Job, Lawrence! You just keep going don't you!?

Hand to hand combat in the battle for hearts and minds.

Rule 1: rattle their confidence. make them realize they are losing.

 

[robertwerden]

Rupert Murdoch ( newscorp, fox news) owns WSJ, it is no longer a busness news service. Wall Street Journal is now just another cog in the Murdoch engine on the Tyranny train.

 

[AceNZ]

Attempted damage by association is a tool for the weak-minded -- and a mark of desperation.

Have you seen the campaign's response to Mona Charen's column in the National Review? It says, in part:

Dr. Paul stands for freedom, peace, prosperity, and the protection of inalienable individual rights. He knows that liberty is the antidote for racism, anti-Semitism, and other small minded ideologies. Dr. Paul has focused all of his energy on winning the presidency so he can cut the size of government and protect the freedom of every American. Neither he nor his staff is going to waste time screening donors. If a handful of individuals with views anathema to Dr. Paul’s send in checks, then they have wasted their money. I cannot profess to understand the motivations of Don Black as neither Dr. Paul nor I know who he is, but a simple Google search shows that his $500 contribution has netted him at least 88 news hits, including Charen’s column. Perhaps a better explanation for his “contribution” is not support for Ron, but the attention he knew he would receive.

From: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTJmOWM2ZGQzNzAzOTQwYWJlMDg4YjJiMjE4MWRlZTY

 

[d991]

Here is the email I just sent to Ms. Schatz

Dear Ms. Schatz:

Well you pretty much managed to hit all of the negatives and associate Dr. Paul with some pretty unattractive people.

Was it really necessary to include Don Black and Stormfront in an article on his supporters?

Also, the mention of the Ku Klux Klan was a nice touch. I am kind of surprised that you did not find a way to get Hitler’s name in there.

For the record, I am the guy who paid for the USA Today advertisement. I grew up in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I attended public high school. My father (deceased) was a Korean Vet. I have a BA degree from Colgate University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. I have a wife and three young children.

I believe your treatment of Dr. Paul’s supporters in your article was grossly unfair. Obviously you do not understand the message.

That is OK, you will. The message is so powerful that people like you cannot stop it. The internet changes the rules of the game. Think Guttenberg press and reformation. The advertisement in USA Today will become the “Common Sense” of our time.

You can fight it, or join us over on the winning side.

Your choice.

Very sincerely,

Lawrence W. Lepard

Thanks for everything you have been doing for this campaign! The USA Today ad was fantastic and could not have happened without your help. It is important that someone like you with an impressive educational background confronts these media twits who claim Ron Paul supporters are kooks and lunatics. It is a sad day when people who are passionate about liberty are dismissed as fringe elements.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

Here is the email I just sent to Ms. Schatz

Dear Ms. Schatz:

Well you pretty much managed to hit all of the negatives and associate Dr. Paul with some pretty unattractive people.

Was it really necessary to include Don Black and Stormfront in an article on his supporters?

Also, the mention of the Ku Klux Klan was a nice touch. I am kind of surprised that you did not find a way to get Hitler’s name in there.

For the record, I am the guy who paid for the USA Today advertisement. I grew up in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I attended public high school. My father (deceased) was a Korean Vet. I have a BA degree from Colgate University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. I have a wife and three young children.

I believe your treatment of Dr. Paul’s supporters in your article was grossly unfair. Obviously you do not understand the message.

That is OK, you will. The message is so powerful that people like you cannot stop it. The internet changes the rules of the game. Think Guttenberg press and reformation. The advertisement in USA Today will become the “Common Sense” of our time.

You can fight it, or join us over on the winning side.

Your choice.

Very sincerely,

Lawrence W. Lepard

Youre being real nice... Heres my version

"Amy, we're gonna run right over you,. you best get out of the way."


Ill tell you lepard, I like that analogy with the Guttenberg press.. very true

 

[Sandra]

I am just absolutely amazed at a WSJ article completely devoted to the dubious deeds of a couple of supporters. She has set out from the start to write a negative ad, and she had to attack supporters since it was hard to get anything on the candidate.

 

[troyd1]

Brought tears to my eyes.

 

[American]

If the WSJ caters to the investment class of people then they know who Dr. Paul is on his many confrontations with the FED, either Greenspan or Beranake. This article might actually backfire on them, I know if I was an investor and heard this about the man who is trying to level the playing field with investors.

The federal Reserve changes the rules on investing, and people lose money when they print more money. I bet allot of people have lost money because of the FED.

I am curious to read the apposing article's on this and you know they will be many.

 

[michaelwise]

Thank God our numbers have grown so large as to not miss any of the garbage being spewed out there, and tactful action is being taken to address the culprits.
Unethical journalists are put on notice that every smear they spew will be addressed.

 

[speciallyblend]

Llepard,you just won major discounts and colorado ski resorts and some hotel discounts,so please im me,if you are ever interested in a winter colorado ski trip,or a summer rafting trip.,just drop a note, peace kenny griffin, A RON PAUL REPUBLICAN please visit ronpaulsumit.com to claim your prize