Libertarian ‘Utopia’ Styled After Ayn Rand Book Spectacularly Falls Apart Almost Immediately

CaseyJones

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
7,564
Libertarian ‘Utopia’ Styled After Ayn Rand Book Spectacularly Falls Apart Almost Immediately

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/0...spectacularly-falls-apart-almost-immediately/

A community made up of American ex-pats deep in the South American hills of Chile – far away from America’s annoying taxes, healthcare mandate, and legal abortions — was supposed to be a libertarian paradise of rugged individualism. Instead it cost many of the people who bought into it almost everything, and now is buried under lawsuits — a reminder that everything that glitters is not inflation-proof, Ron Paul-backed gold.

It seems pretty obvious that basing one’s society on a single work of (poorly written) fiction is folly, but for many adherents of Ayn Rand and her seminal book of Objectivist allegorical grandstanding, Atlas Shrugged isn’t just any book. It’s about as close to the Bible that many libertarians have — apart from the Bible, of course. It’s influenced an astounding number of conservative public figures — from Ron Paul to Rand Paul to Ronald Reagan. Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney’s Rand-loving running mate and probable 2016 presidential contender, said it was his favorite book growing up.

...

For the price of $48,500 you too could own a piece of Galt’s Gulch (specifically, one-and-a-half acres of it). Amazingly, people cashed in their retirements and did just that.

A year later and things have completely unraveled. According to one person who spent a great deal of her savings on this grand experiment, the thing was doomed from the start. Based on her description, what you are left with is the growing sense that this isn’t just a case of arrogant stupidity, this is a downright scam.

Writing out of The Dollar Vigilante, a website devoted to the libertarian movement, the investor, Wendy McElroy, who describes herself as an individualist anarchist, documents the nightmare of Galt’s Gulch Chile:

Many have wondered about the status of Galt’s Gulch Chile (GGC), the libertarian community that was planned and sold in lots as a liberty oasis for those who wished to live freedom before they died. My husband and I purchased an option on 1.25 acres in July 2013. Others bought 10- or 25-acre lots and some invested in the agricultural side of the venture; extremely savvy investors committed small fortunes. GGC has been an unexpectedly wild ride since then.

After throwing in considerable money, McElroy received an email from a concerned friend, essentially calling the entire operation into question. At first McElroy dismisses the email, at the harried assurance of Ken Johnson. Later, it begins to be apparent that the concerned friend was disturbingly on the money (emphasis added).

There will be no zoning for the 1.25-acre lots or other arrangements of less than 10 acres. GGC is an environmentally protected area and it would take the political movement of heaven and earth to allow a community based on small lots to be officially approved. I had the opportunity to ask a question of the salesman who showed my husband and me “our property.” I claimed it because I fell head over heels for the most beautiful tree I’ve ever seen. I felt an instant connection as though the two of us were old souls who had found each other. I could believe it, I could see it… waking up each morning and having coffee under that tree, telling it about my plans for the day. Months later, in a Skype conference, I asked the then-GGC-alienated salesman, “When you ‘sold’ us the property, when you printed out a photo from your phone that read ‘Wendy’s tree,’ did you know you could not legally sell us the lot you were offering?” He said, “That is correct.”

Since writing that, the Galt’s Gulch Chile founders have been engaged in a series of increasingly dramatic legal and personal squabbles. Litigation is being thrown around, as are ad hominem attacks. Nearly all of the anger is directed at Ken Johnson. One former co-owner, Jeff Berwick, who happens to run The Dollar Vigilante website, has called Johnson a sociopath and a fraud. A Facebook community has been established calling itself “Galt’s Gulch Chile Rehab and The Exposing of Ken Johnson” to serve as a support group for other investors who felt they were ripped off.

Meanwhile, Galt’s Gulch owes “hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars to hardware stores [and] service providers” in Chile for work done in preparation for the community. As the pyramid scheme of investors collapses, it seems likely that those workers – many of them poor laborers from small Chilean towns — will go unpaid. The workers being ripped off by the moochers? How very Randian.

The Grim Reaper lingers nearby. By the end of August, the entire online existence of Galt’s Gulch Chile had been scrubbed from the web. Every promotional YouTube video made to entice suckers freedom-lovers has been taken down. The GGC website comes back with an error message. Ken Johnson is in the wind.

It’s almost as if basing a community around people who hate other people and don’t want to have to pay for any services that don’t directly and concretely benefit themselves is inherently unstable. Who would have thought?
 
A bunch of folks get scammed, something something, Libertarianism is thus proven a pile of bullshit!

Only in the mind of the hack that wrote this article does the former prove the latter.
 
Geeze, what did they expect, a frickin' miracle. So AN example of Ayn's solution didn't work out as hoped, does that invalidate her problem observations and analyses?
 
I read the article and I still don't quite understand what actually happened.

The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.

Yet the author somehow claims the whole idea is "It’s almost as if basing a community around people who hate other people and don’t want to have to pay for any services that don’t directly and concretely benefit themselves is inherently unstable." Huh?
 
Gult's Gulch Chile website is actually still up and running.

http://galtsgulchchile.com/contact-us/

Here is a more complete story from the man who did (and, it sounds like, is determined to still do) the project, The Dollar Vigilante, Jeff Berwick:

http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014/8/27/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-on-galts-gulch-chile.html

Here is the conclusion and take-away, as of about a month ago:

However, if GGC owns the land on which it has been selling lots (which it appears to although Ken Johnson may have recently tried to swap out the land to another company - but even if that is the case that would clearly be illegal and that transaction should be able to be nullified) and if the water rights are confirmed (one lawyer for GGC a year ago told me that the property does have sufficient water rights for the community) then it is quite possible that all the founders, investors and buyers could gain control of the enterprise and it still could be a wonderful community.

And, in fact, almost every founder, investor and buyer is committed to doing whatever it takes to fix a ton of mismanagement mistakes (which can only be one of two things: complete incompetence or outright fraud). And the group who has founded, invested in and/or bought at GGC is one of the most amazing groups of people I've ever had the pleasure of knowing and they all want to fix this because they believe in the concept and idea and truly want to live amongst each other as neighbors.

So, in this sense, the fight to create this community has just begun. I have told everyone involved that even though I apparently own nothing of the project I will do everything within my power to fix these problems. This has been a massive weight on my shoulders since the very beginning and not having the ability to have any sort of control of things nor even the ability to tell this story has been one of the most stressful times of my life.

In essence, all that it would take to repair most of the problems is for Ken Johnson to allow the investors and buyers to gain access and control to their investment (as any normal business would) and allow them to restructure and professionally manage the property which they are fully willing to do. There are literally dozens of amazing, highly qualified individuals who believe in this project and want to do anything they can to make it a success. Unfortunately, whether it is due to paranoia, mental illness or trying to cover up significant fraudulent actions Johnson has shown no willingness to do so and continues to operate in complete secrecy and to treat investors and buyers as enemies.

This will come to a resolution one way or another. This is not the last you will hear about Galt's Gulch Chile.
 
The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.

I heard there's a new and active volcano on the oceans floor. If it sticks it's head above water, someone run over there and stick a flag in it!

-t
 
Last edited:
"Things like that" -- island projects -- have been tried or done multiple times. Some have had a degree of success. You could read all about it in How to Start Your Own Country. A great book, by the way.
 
"Things like that" -- island projects -- have been tried or done multiple times. Some have had a degree of success. You could read all about it in How to Start Your Own Country. A great book, by the way.

I have a copy of that book somewhere. read it long ago.
Bummer that Loompanics went out of business :(

-t
 
They haven't given up on socialism, fascism, dictatorships, crony-xxx-ism, yet....but libertarianism...

Socialists like to claim that capitalism doesn't work, and they point to our economic system as proof. But the truth is, actual capitalism hasn't been practiced. So it is with this situation - the claim of libertarianism, but not the practice of it.
 
I'm sorry for all of the people that were taken in by this. The Atlas Society leadership folks moved to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project. We got to see Atlas Shrugged Part 3 before anyone else, for free. We got to see Atlas Shrugged Part 2 almost before everyone else. They even held the Atlas Summit in Manchester this year, the week before PorcFest.

For those thinking they can escape the Reach of the US government, unless it collapses or you move to Russia or China, you cannot. The US can do anything it wants to anyone in Chile.
 
Careful consideration of the legal regulatory environment in which you intend to operate your venture should have been the first step before pitching the project to participants.
 
that show was brought to you by the Bankers. This show makes me vomit. That one dude claims to be a Libertarian?...geez......that place is Commune. No way will it ever be a Utopia......
 
The author has things complete backwards. The goal to base a community away from undo government regulations failed due to government regulations. GGC was plotted out on land the local government would not allow to be developed.

Exactly, it should have been in Somalia. ;)

And to be Randian is should have been undisclosed and invite only for people who had really turned their back on the western 'system'. Not a retirement village.
 
Back
Top