Libertarian Candidates Expose Themselves as Anti-Trump Shills for Hillary Clinton

No1butPaul

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
1,531
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...ves-as-anti-trump-shills-for-hillary-clinton/

Libertarian Party presidential nominee Gary Johnson and his running mate William Weld exposed themselves as shills for Democrat Hillary Clinton during an extensive primetime town hall with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

Weld defended Hillary Clinton on her private email scandal and played attack dog on Donald Trump.

Johnson seemed sleepy, but he answered a question at length about THC amounts in marijuana and another from a young man asking about legalized prostitution. Johnson only lightly and perfunctorily criticized Clinton, instead focusing most of his low-energy attacks on Trump. He also revealed a personal gluten allergy and said that he himself would not patronize the services of prostitutes.
 
The Johnson-Weld team seems to think that libertarianism is mostly about admitting as many immigrants to the United States as possible. This is a far cry from Ron Paul’s pro-borders libertarian movement of a few years ago. The libertarian movement has shifted to the progressive globalist Left.

Yup, sure has.
 
Looks like I am just about done trying to convince liberty lovers not to vote for them. They are doing it for me.
 
Gary Johnson doesn't need votes from "liberty lovers" of your variety. He needs them from moderate republicans and moderate democrats. He kills his campaign dead in the water if he tries to cater to dogmatic libertarians or the socon/paleo right wing.
 
Gary Johnson doesn't need votes from "liberty lovers" of your variety... He kills his campaign dead in the water if he tries to cater to dogmatic libertarians or the socon/paleo right wing.

Dogmatic libertarians? Since when are fundamental principles dogmatic?

I gotta hear this one. Do tell.
 
Last edited:
Totally agree with you. It's the only explanation for why so many "libertarians" around here and elsewhere support the progressive Republican nominee, Trump.

Trump is not a globalist. That would be Johnson and Hillary.
 
Gary Johnson doesn't need votes from "liberty lovers" of your variety. He needs them from moderate republicans and moderate democrats. He kills his campaign dead in the water if he tries to cater to dogmatic libertarians or the socon/paleo right wing.

Uh, "moderates" are globalist traitors. You know, as in America-hating, world government loving pieces of dung.
 
"inclined to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true."

Dogmatic is not a negative.

Well. When I read/hear the word dogmatic I understand it to mean that someone is telling me that my view is a matter of opinion that is up for contestation. 10 times out of 10, I'm likely going to ask someone to support a claim like that.

If we're looking for opinions, I'd opine that Gary Johnson and his political promoters are doing Individual Liberty a disservice. Seems like they're pissing all over it. And in its name, no less. This is the nature of coercion. It's not new. It's just happening here now is all.

I'll tell you something. Once this election is over, some friends are likely going to be held accountable by way of example in the public eye for the disservice. In fact, I'm sure of it.
 
Last edited:
I guess Johnson and Weld should move to Illinois, where abortion is now the primary choice. By law.

Lockstep with Hillary and the Democrats.
 
It makes strategic sense. They are more likely to pull a lukeworm Clinton supporter if they refrain from attacking her too much. And all the non Trump supporters know he is a crazy nutjob so attacking him helps with that demographic as well and probably does no harm with those who only support him because he is not Clinton. The diehard Trump supporters, anti immigrant, nationist, alt-right types would never defect anyway so there is no point targeting them.
 
Then why does he pretend to be a Libertarian?

He is a Libertarian for sure. But for bonus points, he's also a libertarian. Anybody who goes on national TV, explains the NAP and says to end the wars justifies the label for me.

He's impure, but so was Ron Paul, who voted yes to H.J. Res. 64. and routinely funneled pork into house bills. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul is still a libertarian.
 
It makes strategic sense. They are more likely to pull a lukeworm Clinton supporter if they refrain from attacking her too much. And all the non Trump supporters know he is a crazy nutjob so attacking him helps with that demographic as well and probably does no harm with those who only support him because he is not Clinton. The diehard Trump supporters, anti immigrant, nationist, alt-right types would never defect anyway so there is no point targeting them.

Lucidly put. +rep
 
Back
Top