Let us remember the torture and rape of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

ClaytonB

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Messages
10,223
Title should be: Let us remember the ongoing torture and rape of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

aafia-graduation.png








Texas Public Radio: Pakistani prisoner beaten and sexually assaulted in Fort Worth federal prison, lawsuit says (Sep 25, 2024)

Siddiqui's incarceration in FMC Carswell is murder in slow-motion.

The Abduction, Secret Detention, Torture, And Repeated Raping Of Aafia Siddiqui
By Stephen Lendman
12-15-2008

Post-9/11, the "war on terror" has been a jihad against Islam, the colonizers v. the colonized, or what Edward Said called "the familiar (America, Europe, us) and the strange (the Orient, East, them)." Dr. Aafia Siddiqui is one of its most tragic, aggrieved, and ravaged victims. Her ordeal continues horrifically.

Boston Magazine's Katherine Oxment asked: "Who's afraid of Aafia Siddiqui? She went to MIT and Brandeis, married a (physician, lived in Boston), cared for her children....raised money for charities....did other volunteer work, hosted play groups in her apartment, (is) deeply religious....distribute(d) Korans to inmates in area prisons," and did nothing out of the ordinary. (She) "was a normal woman living a normal American life. Until the FBI called her a terrorist....a high-profile Al Qaeda operative," but we've seen these charges before, and each time they were bogus. They're egregiously so against Aafia - a woman guilty only of being Muslim at the wrong time in America or elsewhere if you're on Washington's target list.

Against her and others, no evidence exists so prosecutors invent it. Most (or key parts) is kept classified, unavailable to the defense, and trials are judicial equivalents of circuses. Witnesses are enlisted, pressured, coerced, and/or bought off to cooperate. Proceedings are carefully orchestrated. Due process is effectively denied, and juries are intimidated to convict the innocent for political advantage.

The dominant media cooperate. Using information from Washington Post writer, Douglas Farah, and other sources, writer Lindsey Worth of FMS, Inc. referred to "the mysterious Aafia Siddiqui....allegedly Al Qaeda's only female leader" in connecting her to "the Al Queda diamond operation" in West Africa.

The Times Online calls Aafia "Al-Qaeda woman," and for ABC News she's "Mata Hari" in a lengthy report featuring unsubstantiated charges against her, including:

-- possessing detailed radiological, chemical and biological information, including possessing a liter of cyanide and instructions for a "dirty bomb;"
-- more documents for a mass casualty attack;
-- a list of New York targets, including the Statue of Liberty, Brooklyn Bridge, Empire State Building, Wall Street, and the animal disease center on Plum Island;
-- terrorist recruiting;

-- possessing excerpts from "The Anarchist's Arsenal;"

-- "documents detailing US military assets;"

-- methods of attack by reconnaissance drones, underwater bombs and gliders; and

-- a thumb (or flash) drive packed with emails detailing "specific cells" and planned attacks to carry out.

According to the FBI, she is, or was when captured, a potential "treasure trove" of information on terrorist supporters, sympathizers or sleepers in America and overseas. CIA officer John Kiriakou said she's "the most significant capture in five years," and an unnamed counterterrorism official called her "a very dangerous person, no doubt about it."

For Kiriakou, she's a "radical" involved in planning "a wide variety of different operations (perhaps with WMDs)," including a "possible attempt on the life of the President." Unnamed sources from three federal agencies accused her of an "ill conceived" and perhaps amateurish plot to "kill all living US presidents," including Jimmy Carter by poisoning.

By marriage to his nephew, she's also reputedly linked to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "principal architect of the 9/11 attacks," according to the 9/11 Commission. He reportedly "gave her up" after capture on March 1, 2003, and shortly thereafter she and her children disappeared.

The DOJ also connects her to Adnan El Shukrijumah, another suspected Al Qaeda member "involved in terrorist planning with senior Al Qaeda leaders overseas and across America," according to John Ashcroft.

Aafia's friends and family deny all charges. They call her an innocent victim of US persecution, and an especially egregious one for being ravaged in detention. One supporter (Abu Sabaya) said this about the woman he knew:

"I want you to come to know of the concern and dedication that this woman had for Islam as described by those who knew her - a dedication that was manifested by way of actions that were very simple and easy, yet seldom carried out by those who are able.

Those who knew Aafia recall that she was a very small, quiet, polite, and shy woman who was barely noticeable in a gathering. However....she would say what (was) needed" when necessary.

While at MIT, she organized drives to deliver Korans and other Islamic literature to Muslims in local prisons. She was also dedicated to Islam on campus where fellow students described her as soft-spoken, studious, religious, but not extremist or fundamentalist. She wrote three instructional guides on the faith. More as well on how to run a daw'ah table to provide religious information and training for da'iyas (callers to Islam). She wrote:

"Imagine our humble, but sincere daw'ah effort turning into a major daw'ah movement in this country! Just imagine it! And us, reaping the reward of everyone who accepts Islam throught this movement (for) years to come. Think and plan big. May Allah give this strength and sincerity to us so that our humble effort continues and expands until America becomes a Muslim land."

Aafia taught local Muslim children on Sundays, but her greatest passion was to help oppressed Muslims worldwide. She spoke publicly, sent emails, gave slideshow presentations, and raised donations while a student and caring for three young children at home.

Because of her faith, activism, and passion for the oppressed, it's little wonder she was targeted and why Assistant US Attorney Christopher LaVigne called her "a high security risk" despite no evidence to prove it.

Her Background and What Happened

Aafia is a Pakistani national with degrees from MIT and a doctorate in neurocognitive science from Brandeis. Despite false media reports, she's not a microbiologist, geneticist or neurologist. Nor did her training provide expertise for WMD terrorism. As her lawyer, Elaine Whitfeld Sharp, explains:

The prosecution claimed "that Aafia was involved in biochemical warfare. She wasn't taking brain cells and testing how they reacted to gases. But there's all this news in the media about the changing face of Al Qaeda, the neurobiology scare, and now we've got this MIT graduate with a Brandeis Ph.D. who's cooking up all these viruses."

Boston Magazine writer Katherine Ozment explained what Aafia "was actually cooking up" - the simple concept that people learn by imitation. To study it, "she devised a computer program and used adult volunteers, who came to her office and watched various objects move randomly across the screen, then reproduced what they recalled. The point was to see how well they retained the information having seen in on the screen."

Brandeis professor of cognitive science Paul DiZio laughed about how this could apply to terrorism. "I can't see how it can be applied to anything. It's not applied work. It didn't have a medical aspect to it. And, as a computer expert, she was competent. But you know, calling her a mastermind or something (is ludicrous) - I never saw any evidence."

She and her husband (a medical resident at the time at Brigham and Women's Hospital) used their apartment for a 1999 nonprofit organization they began called the Institute of Islamic Research and Teaching. It had nothing to do with terrorism. According to the neighborhood Mosque's Imam, Abdullah Faruuq: "What I know of (Aafia) is that she was living here in America, and her organization was for sharing Islamic information with the American people."

Faruuq was impressed with her dedication. "Aafia was an American girl and a good sister." She also wanted her husband to use his medical skills to help the less fortunate. Despite her devout faith, "there was nothing radical about Siddiqui. She just seemed like a very kind person."

She's also a mother of three, and a victim of extreme viciousness in detention. According to her mother, Ismet, she "left the family home in Gulshan-e-lqbal in a taxi on March 30 to catch a flight for Rawalpindi, but never reached the airport." Inside sources claim she was picked up by intelligence agents en route, and initial reports suggest then handed over to the FBI.

She was missing for over a year when the agency posted her photographs on its web site. Shortly afterward, a story was leaked about her involvement in the 2001 Liberian diamond trade with her as an Al Qaeda operative. The family's attorney, Elaine Whitfield Sharp, called the allegation a blessing in disguise because it placed Aafia in Liberia at a specific time when she can prove she was in Boston that week.

Aafia's mother says that only days after her daughter's disappearance a man on motorcycle came to her family home and warned her to say nothing about what happened if she wanted to see Aafia and her grandchildren again. She hasn't since, and according to the Pakistani Urdu press, the family was picked up by local authorities and taken into custody. A government interior ministry spokesman and two unnamed US officials confirmed the report in the press. They then retracted their statements, but local Chicago NBC news (based on a Press Trust of India account) reported that Aafia was being interrogated by US intelligence officials.

At the time, the FBI website stated: "Although the FBI has no information indicating this individual is connected to specific terrorist activities, the FBI would like to locate and question this individual." The agency knew full well what happened - that Aafia was in secret detention, that her horrific ordeal had begun, and that they and other US authorities were involved.

A Brief Timeline of Affia's Case

-- March 18, 2003: the FBI issues an alert requesting information about Aafia;

-- March 29: UPI reports that the FBI believes Aafia may be an Al Qaeda "fixer," transferring money to support "terrorist" operations;

-- March 30: Aafia disappears en route to the airport for a flight to Rawalpindi;

-- April 3: CNN reports that Al Qaeda figure Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (arrested March 1) mentioned Aafia during interrogation; Pakistani authorities deny any knowledge of her whereabouts;

-- April 4: the FBI denies that it captured and is detaining Aafia;

-- May 26: John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert Mueller cite reports that Al Queda plans an attack on the US in the summer or fall; Aafia is named as an Al Qaeda "operative and facilitator" and is one of seven Al Qaeda members being sought;

-- May 28, 2004: Pakistan's Interior Ministry confirms that Aafia was turned over to US authorities in 2003 after it was unable to establish any links she may have had with Al Qaeda;

-- A 2006 Amnesty International report includes Aafia as one of many of the "disappeared" in the "war on terror;"

-- A 2007 Ghost Prisoner Human Rights Watch report said that Aafia "may have once been held" in secret CIA detention;

-- A February 2008 Asian Human Rights Commission report said Aafia was brought to Karachi and severely tortured to secure her compliance as a government witness against Khalid Shiekh Mohammed;

-- July 7, 2008: UK journalist Yvonne Ridley identifies Aafia as "Prisoner 650" at the US Bagram, Afghanistan torture-prison;

-- July 11: US Lt. Col. Rumi Nielson-Green denies that any women are being held at Bagram;

-- July 31: the FBI tells Aafia's brother that she's in US custody;

-- August 4: a DOJ press release says that Afghanistan National Police arrested Aafia in Ghazni on July 17 and that she was wounded the next day while trying to shoot US Army personnel;

-- August 6: US Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis orders Aafia be held without bail; her court-appointed lawyer, Elizabeth Fink, says charges against her are "absurd;" a bail hearing was set for August 11 and another for August 18 to determine if she should be tried;

-- August 12: the Washington Pakistani embassy formally requests that Aafia be repatriated to Pakistan;

-- August 13: the US military in Afghanistan denies it ever held Aafia in detention and that an unnamed female prisoner was someone else;

-- September 12: according to a report in MIT's The Tech, court documents released today indicate that Aafia "was diagnosed with chronic depressive type psychosis;"

-- September 23: Judge Richard Berman enters a "not guilty" plea on behalf of Aafia; she refuses to come to court because doing so requires she be strip-searched; he sets December 17 as the next hearing date to determine her fitness to stand trial; he also sets March 9, 2009 as a tentative trial date;

-- September 29: World Net Daily reports that for the "first time since 9/11, counterterrorism field agents have been authorized to spy on young Muslim men and women - including American citizens - who have traveled to Pakistan without any specific evidence (suggesting) wrongdoing;"

-- October 2: Aafia is moved to the Carswell Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX for psychiatric evaluation; in vain, her lawyer pleaded that she not be sent because she urgently needs medical treatment;

-- October 6: Pakistani senators Mushahid Hussain Syed, Sadia Abbasi Mehmood, and SM Zafar met with Aafia; Faqir Saeed of the Pakistani embassy as well; she tells them of her ordeal - that she was abducted in 2003, given an injection, found herself in a cell, and was forced to sign papers and confess to things she didn't do; her children's lives were threatened and she was abused grievously;

-- November 17: Judge Richard Berman indicates that a psychiatric evaluation indicates that Aafia is "not competent to proceed as a result of her mental disease, which renders her unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against her;"

-- December 17: the next scheduled date (in New York District Court) to determine if Aafia is fit to stand trial;

-- March 9, 2009: the tentative date for Aafia's trial to begin.

The US Bagram, Afghanistan Torture-Prison

After her abduction, Aafia disappeared into Bagram hell and was known only as "Prisoner 650." Then later, by released prisoners, as the "Gray Lady of Bagram" because of her screams they heard for years.

At one time, Bagram (north of Kabul at the US air base) held twice as many prisoners as Guantanamo and likely still holds hundreds. They're crammed into wire cages, routinely tortured, forced to sleep on floor mats, and have buckets for latrines, or at least did until recently. Many prisoners are held secretly, have been there for years, have no access to lawyers, or any knowledge of the allegations against them. Most, perhaps all, are innocent victims and guilty only of being Muslims at the wrong time in the wrong place.

What's known about Bagram comes from released or transfered prisoners who got access to counsel. In early 2008, The New York Times also reported that the International Committee of the Red Cross filed a confidential complaint with US authorities charging that its detainees were held incommunicado for weeks or months in isolation cells and subjected to cruel treatment (torture) in violation of international law.

In February 2005, The London Guardian reported that a prisoner named Mustafa was blindfolded, handcuffed, gagged, and forced to bend down over a table by three US soldiers. They then "forcibly rammed a stick up my rectum....I could not stop screaming when this happened."

Another case involved Wesam Abdulrahman Ahmed Al Deemawi. For over a 40 days, he was threatened with dogs, stripped and photographed "in shameful and obscene positions," placed in a cage with a hook and hanging rope, and hung on it blindfolded for two days. Both men were never charged and were later released.

Other prisoners were beaten, chained, hung from the ceiling by their wrists, and subjected to numerous other tortures and indignities - for months or years. In some cases so horrifically they died. Aafia and other women were (and still are) at Bagram and other US torture- prisons (including torture-ships at sea), according to British journalist Yvonne Ridley: "There are many Muslim women in the captivity of American forces and if (people remain) silent, (they'll) lose their sisters forever." Some are treated even worse than Aafia.

Ridley wrote about Bagram's "Prisoner 650" and her ordeal of torture and repeatedly being raped for over four years. "The cries of (this) helpless woman echoed (with such torment) in the jail that (it) prompted prisoners to go on hunger strike." Ridley called her a "gray lady (because) she (was) almost a ghost, a spectre whose cries and screams continue to haunt those who heard her. This would never happen to a Western woman." It did to Aafia, other Muslim women as well, and their ordeal continues horrifically.

US and International Law on Prisoners of War and Enforced Disappearances

US and international law are clear and unequivocal on prisoner detentions and their treatment. America under George Bush defiles it, and, given the rogue team he's assembled, the Obama administration (with or without Guantanamo) promises little or no change. These practices are grievous crimes of war and against humanity and should never be tolerated against anyone for any reason. Yet they persist.

The US War Crimes Act (1996) defines these offenses as grave breaches under the Geneva Conventions (1949) and violations of its Common Article 3. It states in part:

...."the following acts are prohibited at any time and in any place....:

-- violence to life and person (including) murder, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

-- ....humiliating and degrading treatment;"

-- sentencing or executing detainees "without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees....recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples;" and

-- assuring wounded and sick are (properly) cared for.

The US Army Field Manual 27-10 is also explicit on the rule of law. It incorporates the Nuremberg Principles prohibiting crimes against humanity, and specifically obligates soldiers to disobey illegal orders or be subject to prosecution under international law. Paragraph 498 states that any person, military or civilian, who commits a crime under international law bears responsibility and may be punished. Paragraph 499 defines a "war crime." Paragraph 509 denies the defense of superior orders in the commission of a crime, and paragraph 510 denies the defense of an "act of state."

Under Article VI of the Constitution (the supremacy clause), international law is part of domestic law, and US presidents take an oath under Article II, Section 1, Clause 7 to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution...." Further, Article II, Section 3 requires the president to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully exercised."

International human rights law also strictly prohibits secret detentions. Under Principle 6 of the (May 1989) UN Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions:

"Governments shall ensure that persons deprived of their liberty are (to be) held in officially recognised places of custody, and that accurate information on their custody and whereabouts, including transfers, is made promptly available to their relatives and lawyers or other persons of confidence."

US and international laws leave no ambiguity on torture or its seriousness when practiced. The (1949) Third Geneva Convention's Article 13 (on the Treatment of Prisoners of War) states:

Detainees "must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited....(these persons) must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation...."

Third Geneva also prohibits physical or mental torture, all other forms of coercion, collective punishment, corporal punishments, and any type of violence. These acts are "war crimes." Various other US and international laws also prohibit them, yet they're official US policy, so far with impunity.

In December 1992, the UN General Assembly passed the Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance. It states that:

"any act of enforced disappearance is an offence to human dignity." It "places the persons subjected thereto outside the protection of the law and inflicts severe suffering on them and their families. It constitutes a violation of the rules of international law guaranteeing, inter alia (among other things), the right to recognition as a person before the law, the right to liberty and security of the person, and the right not to be subjected to torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment....No state shall practice, permit or tolerate enforced disappearances" and must terminate any such acts "in any territory under its jurisdiction." Such practices are crimes of war and against humanity.

In 2005, the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHR&GJ, New York University School of Law) published a report titled: "Fate and Whereabouts Unknown: Detainees in the "War on Terror." It presented "factual summaries of (28) individuals who may be in secret (US) detention sites" and included known information about Aafia at the time.

CHR&GJ said enforced disappearances happen "when individuals are deprived of their liberty by state agents and the state fails to provide information about their fate or whereabouts; through these actions, detainees are placed outside the protection of law."

"Disappearances" include these practices:

-- individuals (often unidentified) held in secret US-run or controlled "black sites;"

-- individuals in foreign-based sites under US control or direction;

-- individuals "extraordinarily renditioned" to "black" or other sites; and

-- individuals held in conflict areas and not properly registered and/or identified, such as CIA "ghost prisoners" on US military facilities like at Bagram.

United States of America v. Aafia Siddiqui

On September 2, the Justice Department (DOJ) indicted Aafia "for attempting to kill United States Nationals in Afghanistan and Six Additional Charges." On September 4, she was arraigned before Judge Richard Berman in US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Michael Garcia, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, stated (in a September 2 press release) that on July 18, 2008, "a team of United States servicemen and law enforcement officers, and others assisting them, attempted to interview Aafia Siddiqui in Ghazni, Afghanistan, where she had been detained by local police the day before....unbeknownst to the United States interview team, unsecured, behind a curtain -- Siddiqui obtained one of the United States Army officer's M-4 rifles and attempted to fire it, and did fire it, at another United States Army officer and other members of the United States interview team....

Siddiqui then assaulted one of the United States Army interpreters, as he attempted to obtain the M-4 rifle from her. Siddiqui subsequently assaulted one of the FBI agents and one of the United States Army officers, as they attempted to subdue her."

Garcia said nothing about years of torture and rape at Bargram or that this frail, weakened, 110 pound woman was confronted by three US Army officers, two FBI agents, and two Army interpreters, yet inexplicably managed to assault three of them, get one of their rifles, open fire at close range, hit no one, and only she was severely wounded. As her attorney put it:

"Picture this woman who is very tiny (and extremely frail and weakened from her ordeal), and ask yourself how she engaged in armed conflict....with six (armed and well-trained) military men, how did this happen? And how did she get shot? I think you can answer that, can't you (and question the absurdity of DOJ's charges against her)?

Garcia outlined, but didn't indict, on the above-listed allegations about specific "cells," handwritten notes about a "mass casualty attack," constructing "dirty bombs," and using various devices and means to deliver them. It was also alleged that before 9/11 she travelled to Liberia where she was involved in illegal diamond trading to support Al Qaeda and then opened a Baltimore post office box for one of its members. None of these claims are credible or showed up in her indictment.

Count One

Attempted Murder of United States Nationals by obtaining a US Army Officer's M-4 rifle and attempting to fire and firing it at him, two other US Interview Team members, and repeatedly stating her intent and desire to kill Americans.

Count Two

Attempted Murder of United States Officers and Employees in the same manner while they were engaged in and on account of the performance of their official duties.

Count Three

Armed Assault of United States Officers and Employees in the same manner.

Count Four

Discharge of A Firearm During (a) Crime of Violence as described above.

Count Five

Assault of United States Officers and Employees as described above.

Count Six

(Further charges of) Assault of United States Officers and Employees as described above.

Count Seven

(More charges of) Assault of United States Officers and Employees as described above.

Aafia's Deteriorating Health

In response to British MP Lord Nazir's letter on Aafia's whereabouts, US authorities confirmed that she's incarcerated at Carswell Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX (pursuant to an October 1, 2008 US District Court, NY judicial directive) where she's undergoing psychiatric evaluation, but not getting desperately needed medical attention.

Nazir earlier raised questions about her detention and said "she (was) physically tortured and continuously raped by the officers at the (Bagram) prison" - for over four years. He now wants her immediately released and repatriated to Pakistan after it was learned she's held on dubious charges plus all the horrific treatment she endured - yet is guilty of nothing.

Aafia is in deplorable condition and, according to Judge Berman, not in a correct state of mind to stand trial. On August 7, 2008, Iqbal Haider, Co-chairperson of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) expressed concern about her. He called it shocking and of grave concern that pictures of her show a beat-up frail and helpless woman, the effects of years of torture, abuse, and continuous rape. There are dark circles under her eyes, a badly repaired broken nose, "made up" teeth and crumbled lips, and overall "a picture of a severely dehydrated, sick person almost as if on the death bed. It shows the inhumane brutality of an apparently civilised nation by the administration of a country which claims to be much civilised."

According to HRCP and Aafia's family, her physical condition is deplorable, and she badly needs immediate medical treatment outside the Carswell prison where it's not given. "Her wound was oozing blood," and her clothes were soaked in it. Earlier in custody, one of her kidneys was removed, yet her abdominal pain persists. She has large stitches down her torso from the surgery, negligently done, and may be suffering from internal bleeding. Her teeth were removed. Her nose was broken and improperly reset. Her gunshot wound was incompetently dressed, and her overall condition is dire and life-threatening.

This poor woman was savaged by a criminal state operating outside the law for political advantage. Her outrageous treatment continues. Her son, Ahmed (a US citizen), is being detained in Afghanistan, but the whereabouts of her other two children is unknown.

NEVER FORGET
 
Last edited:
When that day comes and it might, noone's gonna give a shit about me either.

Well, I give a shit. Not only about Dr. Siddiqui, but all the innocent foreigners that have been put through the US Government's hell-on-earth meatgrinder. Dr. Siddiqui just happens to be one of the most undeniable and emblematic cases... she's obviously innocent of everything they have accused her of; she is no threat to anyone except the criminals who have incarcerated her; and her plight is an ongoing injustice which is being perpetrated to cover up the criminal actions of those who incarcerated her to begin with (in order to cover up their earlier crimes, ad nauseum). The US Government is the most wicked and prolific criminal organization on earth. Americans allow that rogue government to use their own cash, and operate in their name. Why? That is the question that Dr. Siddiqui's case should cause every American to ask themselves. Why are we funding a criminal syndicate who is right this very minute trying to torture an innocent woman to death in order to cover up their crimes??

Time to start giving a shit. The heavenly razor is descending upon earth and you're either on the right side, or you're on the side of pure and absolute evil. Everyone will be forced to pick a side, zero exceptions.
 
Well, I give a shit. Not only about Dr. Siddiqui, but all the innocent foreigners that have been put through the US Government's hell-on-earth meatgrinder. Dr. Siddiqui just happens to be one of the most undeniable and emblematic cases... she's obviously innocent of everything they have accused her of; she is no threat to anyone except the criminals who have incarcerated her; and her plight is an ongoing injustice which is being perpetrated to cover up the criminal actions of those who incarcerated her to begin with (in order to cover up their earlier crimes, ad nauseum). The US Government is the most wicked and prolific criminal organization on earth. Americans allow that rogue government to use their own cash, and operate in their name. Why? That is the question that Dr. Siddiqui's case should cause every American to ask themselves. Why are we funding a criminal syndicate who is right this very minute trying to torture an innocent woman to death in order to cover up their crimes??

Time to start giving a shit. The heavenly razor is descending upon earth and you're either on the right side, or you're on the side of pure and absolute evil. Everyone will be forced to pick a side, zero exceptions.

Many people have already chosen. I would put the American Xenophobic movement firmly in the camp of the "Hezekiah's" (2 Kings 20:16). They think immigration is important because they're just hoping they'll have peace in their own lifetime. The future be damned. This is no different than the current boomers racking up infinite debt. They assume they'll get their pensions and die of old age before it gets really bad.

Cowardly gen x'ers and ex-hippies are just hoping they can hide within the walls of empire long enough to where they can die in peace.

"Not my problem" is a fig leaf of machismo to hide their selfishness.
 
"Not my problem" is a fig leaf of machismo to hide their selfishness.

I don't hide it I'm selfish as fuck. "Selfish" is a word people made up to manipulate others into doing what they want.

I focus on my own well being and I'm supposed to feel bad about that? Fuck that.
 
I don't hide it I'm selfish as fuck. "Selfish" is a word people made up to manipulate others into doing what they want.

I focus on my own well being and I'm supposed to feel bad about that? Fuck that.

You are right that collectivists use the word "selfish" to push their agenda at the expense of others who fear being portrayed as selfish. However, selfishness is a terrible vice. You have already expressed the despair you currently live in -- when they come for you, you know that no one else will care. That's the black-pill. Spit it out and spit out the selfishness which requires you to take that dreadful blackpill. You don't have to become a communist to reject selfishness. There is a better world out there, and it points to a future world which will arrive in the next Age which will not be "forever sleep" no matter what the lying false prophets of modernism claim. That better world requires a change of heart. That change of heart is what the Gospel is all about...
 
Doesn't seem at all obvious to me

Did you watch the videos I linked? What exactly is the evidence that the government has presented that proves (in any reasonable sense, let alone beyond reasonable doubt) that Dr. Siddiqui is guilty of any crime at all? Let me help you: there is zero evidence or credible testimony that Dr. Siddqui has committed any crime at all. She is nothing more than a Mom who got caught up in a dragnet by the 9/11 hype of "guilt by association"; to cover up their crimes, the Americans who originally kidnapped her tried to disappear her and her children. The US Government denied her existence for I think about 8 years until her screams were overheard by a journalist who then started prying into what was going on, and they were forced to disclose her existence. That was after she had already been put through hell by the ISI and set up to be assassinated. Stacking crime upon crime, the US government finally swooped back in, arrested her, shot her, falsely charged her with committing the very act they had just done to her (trying to shoot them), and tried her in a kangaroo court on the trumped up charges and sent her away to FMC Carswell where they are presently murdering her in slow-motion. And we are a nation of 350 million cowards watching this crime unfold before our very eyes and paying trillions of dollars in "taxes" to the government that is committing it. All to cover up a botched gag&bag operation by 9/11-hyped intelligence jocks 20 years ago. One child dead, 2 disappeared, and one mother being murdered in slow-motion in Texas. God Bless America! (Romans 12:14-20)
 
Last edited:
Did you watch the clips above?

I did and it was super biased. So I read the wikipedia article to get the other side of the story and there's a number of things in there that indicate she's not the innocent little angel that your videos are trying to portray.

What exactly is the evidence that the government has presented that proves (in any reasonable sense, let alone beyond reasonable doubt) that Dr. Siddiqui is guilty of any crime at all? Let me help you: there is zero evidence or credible testimony that Dr. Siddqui has committed any crime at all.

I guess that depends on who you ask. There's a lot of smoke here and where there's smoke there's usually fire.

I won't pretend to know who's telling the truth and who's lying here but it sure as shit ain't obvious that she's innocent.
 
There is a better world out there, and it points to a future world which will arrive in the next Age which will not be "forever sleep" no matter what the lying false prophets of modernism claim. That better world requires a change of heart. That change of heart is what the Gospel is all about...

I'm not religious so the only world I've got is this one, and it ain't getting any better any time soon.
 
I did and it was super biased. So I read the wikipedia article to get the other side of the story and there's a number of things in there that indicate she's not the innocent little angel that your videos are trying to portray.

Oh yes, CIA-kipedia, that's the unbiased source, obviously!

I guess that depends on who you ask. There's a lot of smoke here and where there's smoke there's usually fire.

Smoke induced by the very same agency that is more responsible than anybody else for Siddiqui's illegal incarceration.

I won't pretend to know who's telling the truth and who's lying here but it sure as shit ain't obvious that she's innocent.

Really? You are far more naive than I thought. Sad to see another one lost to the NPC mind-virus. Just take a gander at this load of shit from the CIA-kipedia article:

According to Khan [her ex-husband], after the 9/11 attacks, Siddiqui was adamant that the family leave the United States, saying that their lives were in danger if they remained. Once back in Pakistan, Siddiqui demanded that the family move to the border with Afghanistan and Khan work as a medic to help the Taliban mujahideen in their fight against America. Khan was reluctant to disobey his parents, who opposed this move, and uncertain if he had reached the stature traditionally thought necessary to wage jihad. Siddiqui agreed to return to him in the United States in January 2002 after he agreed to her conditions including that he join her in Islamic activities. She began home schooling her children.

...

Khan claimed that these were for hunting and camping expeditions. He later told authorities he purchased them to please Siddiqui. The couple made an appointment to talk to the FBI again in a few weeks, but, according to Khan, Siddiqui insisted the family leave for Pakistan,[66] and on 26 June 2002, the couple and their children returned to Karachi...

In August 2002, Khan alleged that Siddiqui was abusive and manipulative throughout their seven years of marriage; he suspected she was involved in extremist activities.

OK, leaving aside that this is all completely meaningless gibberish because it is the testimony of her EX (in court, this is all hearsay), note that this Khan fellow has the balls to claim that she was abusive when, in point of actual fact, she had to get stitches on her lip from a baby bottle he threw at her. So, that alone proves that, not only is this hearsay, it's false testimony -- the evidence shows he was the abuser.

And let's walk the claim forward a little further to get to the root of the issue, here. Let's suppose that Siddiqui was really the evil mastermind that the CIA-kipedia article laughably tries to paint her out to be... what crime is there in her ordering night-vision goggles and anarchist books, supposing that is even a real thing (these sorts of materials are fingerprint FBI "drop weapon" techniques)? There is no crime there, it's just boilerplate gun-grabber Fed glowie logic. So, the worst charges they can even bring against her are literally nothing.

So, you have CIA-kipedia citing proven liar testimony from her EX, and you have the testimony of the FBI itself, another proven liar (most recent example being Patel and Bongino bald-faced lying on national TV)... and that's "smoke"? You're so absolutely naive you believe that there is ANY counterpoint here? There is no counterpoint at all and, in fact, this article omits 90% of the horror that Siddiqui has been subjected to at the hands of Americans and American "allies" in order to cover up their crimes in her case.

I thought you were better than that. Sad for you. One thing you have right... this is all going to get A LOT worse...
 
I see the Internet memory-hole scrubbers have been busy scrubbing the last traces of this story from the Internet. We truly are on the worst timeline...

The Truth About US Justice

By Yvonne Ridley
February 06, 2010 "Information Clearing House" - -

Many of us are still in a state of shock over the guilty verdict returned on Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

The response from the people of Pakistan was predictable and overwhelming and I salute their spontaneous actions.

From Peshawar to Islamabad, Karachi, Lahore and beyond they marched in their thousands demanding the return of Aafia.

Even some of the US media expressed discomfort over the verdict returned by the jurors … there was a general feeling that something was not right.

Everyone had something to say, everyone that is except the usually verbose US Ambassador Anne Patterson who has spent the last two years briefing against Dr Aafia and her supporters.

This is the same woman who claimed I was a fantasist when I gave a press conference with Tehreek e Insaf leader Imran Khan back in July 2008 revealing the plight of a female prisoner in Bagram called the Grey Lady. She said I was talking nonsense and stated categorically that the prisoner I referred to as “650” did not exist.

By the end of the month she changed her story and said there had been a female prisoner but that she was most definitely not Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

By that time Aafia had been gunned down at virtually point blank range in an Afghan prison cell jammed full of more than a dozen US soldiers, FBI agents and Afghan police.

Her Excellency briefed the media that the prisoner had wrested an M4 gun from one soldier and fired off two rounds and had to be subdued. The fact these bullets failed to hit a single person in the cell and simply disappeared did not resonate with the diplomat.

In a letter dripping in untruths on August 16 2008 she decried the “erroneous and irresponsible media reports regarding the arrest of Ms Aafia Siddiqui”. She went on to say: “Unfortunately, there are some who have an interest in simply distorting the facts in an effort to manipulate and inflame public opinion. The truth is never served by sensationalism…”

When Jamaat Islami invited me on a national tour of Pakistan to address people about the continued abuse of Dr Aafia and the truth about her incarceration in Bagram, the US Ambassador continued to issue rebuttals.

She assured us all that Dr Aafia was being treated humanely had been given consular access as set out in international law … hmm. Well I have a challenge for Ms Patterson today. I challenge her to repeat every single word she said back then and swear it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

As Dr Aafia Siddiqui’s trial got underway, the US Ambassador and some of her stooges from the intelligence world laid on a lavish party at the US Embassy in Islamabad for some hand-picked journalists where I’ve no doubt in between the dancing, drinks and music they were carefully briefed about the so-called facts of the case.

Interesting that some of the potentially incriminating pictures taken at the private party managed to find the Ambassador was probably hoping to minimize the impact the trial would have on the streets of Pakistan proving that, for the years she has been holed up and barricaded behind concrete bunkers and barbed wire, she has learned nothing about this great country of Pakistan or its people.

One astute Pakistani columnist wrote about her: “The respected lady seems to have forgotten the words of her own country’s 16th president Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865): “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time”.

And the people of Pakistan proved they are nobody’s fool and responded to the guilty verdict in New York in an appropriate way.

When injustice is the law it is the duty of everyone to rise up and challenge that injustice in any way possible.

The response – so far – has been restrained and measured but it is just the start. A sentence has yet to be delivered by Judge Richard Berman in May.

Of course there has been a great deal of finger pointing and blame towards the jury in New York who found Dr Aafia guilty of attempted murder.

Observers asked how they could ignore the science and the irrefutable facts … there was absolutely no evidence linking Dr Aafia to the gun, no bullets, no residue from firing it.

But I really don’t think we can blame the jurors for the verdict - you see the jury simply could not handle the truth. Had they taken the logical route and gone for the science and the hard, cold, clinical facts it would have meant two things. It would have meant around eight US soldiers took the oath and lied in court to save their own skins and careers or it would have meant that Dr Aafia Siddiqui was telling the truth.

And, as I said before, the jury couldn’t handle the truth. Because that would have meant that the defendant really had been kidnapped, abused, tortured and held in dark, secret prisons by the US before being shot and put on a rendition flight to New York. It would have meant that her three children – two of them US citizens – would also have been kidnapped, abused and tortured by the US.

They say ignorance is bliss and this jury so desperately wanted not to believe that the US could have had a hand in the kidnapping of a five-month -old baby boy, a five-year-old girl and her seven-year-old brother.

They couldn’t handle the truth … it is as simple as that.

Well I, and many others across the world like me, can’t handle any more lies. America’s reputation is lying in the lowest gutters in Pakistan at the moment and it can’t sink any lower.

The trust has gone, there is only a burning hatred and resentment towards a superpower which sends unmanned drones into villages to slaughter innocents.

It is fair to say that America’s goodwill and credibility is all but washed up with most honest, decent citizens of Pakistan.

And I think even Her Excellency Anne Patterson recognizes that fact which is why she is now keeping her mouth shut.

If she has any integrity and any self respect left she should stand before the Pakistan people and ask for their forgiveness for the drone murders, the extra judicial killings, the black operations, the kidnapping, torture and rendition of its citizens, the water-boarding, the bribery, the corruption and, not least of all, the injustice handed out to Dr Aafia Siddiqui and her family.

She should then pick up the phone to the US President and tell him to release Aafia and return Pakistan’s most loved, respected and famous daughter and reunite her with the two children who are still missing.
Then she should re-read her letter of August 16, 2008 and write another … one of resignation.

Yvonne Ridley is a patron of Cageprisoners which first brought the plight of Dr Aafia Siddiqui to the world’s attention shortly after her kidnap in March 2003. The award-winning, investigative journalist also co-produced the documentary In Search of Prisoner 650 with film-maker Hassan al Banna Ghani which concluded that the Grey Lady of Bagram was Dr Aafia Siddiqui
 
The single biggest problem with the CIA-kipedia article, is that it takes as unquestionable truth the US claim that they have no knowledge of Aafia Siddiqui prior to 2008, which is a lie. After the kidnapping and disappearance of Siddiqui and her 3 children in Karachi, she had been in US custody and was later transferred to Pakistani ISI. The exact timeline is unclear, but she was held by the US during that time. The US is lying about that in order to cover up the most egregious parts of the backstory. The reason for this lie is to pretend that her abuse in US custody was actually just the dirty Pakistani ISI. Then, for reasons unknown to anyone, this 5-years incarcerated twig of a women made a bold, dangerous attempt to murder a gaggle of heroic FBI agents and escape custody, but they heroically defended themselves by shooting her in the stomach, twice. But Mr. "Are the officers OK?" apparently can't see through this fig-leaf charade. Amazing...

 
Last edited:
Oh yes, CIA-kipedia, that's the unbiased source, obviously!

I didn't say it was unbiased. I said it was the other side of the story.

Your sources are biased as fuck by the way.

Really? You are far more naive than I thought. Sad to see another one lost to the NPC mind-virus. Just take a gander at this load of shit from the CIA-kipedia article:

I'm naive for not automatically believing your ridiculously biased sources? Yea ok sure.

OK, leaving aside that this is all completely meaningless gibberish because it is the testimony of her EX (in court, this is all hearsay), note that this Khan fellow has the balls to claim that she was abusive when, in point of actual fact, she had to get stitches on her lip from a baby bottle he threw at her. So, that alone proves that, not only is this hearsay, it's false testimony -- the evidence shows he was the abuser.

And let's walk the claim forward a little further to get to the root of the issue, here. Let's suppose that Siddiqui was really the evil mastermind that the CIA-kipedia article laughably tries to paint her out to be... what crime is there in her ordering night-vision goggles and anarchist books, supposing that is even a real thing (these sorts of materials are fingerprint FBI "drop weapon" techniques)? There is no crime there, it's just boilerplate gun-grabber Fed glowie logic. So, the worst charges they can even bring against her are literally nothing.

So, you have CIA-kipedia citing proven liar testimony from her EX, and you have the testimony of the FBI itself, another proven liar (most recent example being Patel and Bongino bald-faced lying on national TV)... and that's "smoke"? You're so absolutely naive you believe that there is ANY counterpoint here? There is no counterpoint at all and, in fact, this article omits 90% of the horror that Siddiqui has been subjected to at the hands of Americans and American "allies" in order to cover up their crimes in her case.

I thought you were better than that. Sad for you. One thing you have right... this is all going to get A LOT worse...

What about this one?

In a bag she was carrying, the police found a number of documents in English and Urdu describing how to make explosives, chemical weapons, Ebola, dirty bombs, and radiological agents, as well as the mortality rates of certain weapons and handwritten notes referring to a "mass casualty attack" that listed various US locations and landmarks (including the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, and the New York City subway system), according to her indictment.
 
Back
Top