Kate Steinle Verdict - Not Guilty

Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
18,553
If you recall, this was the case which FOX used to generate the anti-immigrant hysteria of 2015 which Trump exploited to win the primary.

The anti-immigrant folk are going berserk, as you might imagine.
 
I haven't been following the case, but apparently the prosecution couldn't show any motive, nor that the shot was aimed (there was a ricochet).
 
Well, it's a good thing he didn't have a beer and then accidentally run her over. Then he would be in real trouble.

They should probably give him a blanket and a McDonald's gift card and let him out back onto the streets of San Francisco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
[FONT=&quot]Juan Francisco López-Sánchez (or Francisco Sánchez; given name José Inez García Zárate),[SUP][17][/SUP] of Guanajuato, Mexico, had been deported from the U.S. a total of five times, most recently in 2009.[SUP][18][/SUP] He was on probation in Texas at the time of the shooting.[SUP][19][/SUP] He had seven felony convictions. When he was apprehended, Garcia Zarate was listed as 45 years old by police, but as 52 in jail records.[SUP][20][/SUP][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Garcia Zarate arrived in the U.S. sometime before 1991, the year he was convicted of his first drug charge in Arizona. In 1993, he was convicted three times in Washington state for felony heroin possession and manufacturing narcotics. Following another drug conviction and jail term, this time in Oregon, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) deported Garcia Zarate in June 1994. However, Garcia Zarate returned to the U.S. within two years and was convicted again of heroin possession in Washington state. He was deported for the second time in 1997.[SUP][17][/SUP][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On February 2, 1998, Garcia Zarate was deported for the third time, after reentering the U.S. through Arizona. United States Border Patrol caught him six days later at a border crossing, and a federal court sentenced Garcia Zarate to five years and three months in federal prison for unauthorized reentry. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), successor of the INS, deported Garcia Zarate in 2003 for his fourth deportation. However, he reentered the U.S. through the Texas border and got another federal prison sentence for reentry before being deported for the fifth time in June 2009.[SUP][17][/SUP][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Less than three months after his fifth deportation, Garcia Zarate was caught attempting to cross the border in Eagle Pass, Texas. He pleaded guilty to felony reentry; upon sentencing, a federal court recommended Garcia Zarate be placed in "a federal medical facility as soon as possible".[SUP][17][/SUP][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On March 26, 2015, at the request of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department (SFSD), United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP) had turned Garcia Zarate over to San Francisco authorities for an outstanding drug warrant.[SUP][21][/SUP] San Francisco officials transported Garcia Zarate to San Francisco County Jail on March 26, 2015, to face a 20-year-old felony charge of selling and possessing marijuana after Garcia Zarate completed his latest prison term in San Bernardino County for entering in the country without the proper documents.[SUP][22][/SUP][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for Garcia Zarate requesting that he be kept in custody until immigration authorities could pick him up. However, as a sanctuary city, its “Due Process for All” ordinance[SUP][23][/SUP] restricted cooperation with ICE to cases only where the immigrant had both current violent felony charges and past violent felony convictions; therefore, San Francisco disregarded the detainer and released him.[SUP][24][/SUP][SUP][25][/SUP] He was released from San Francisco County Jail on April 15, 2015 and had no outstanding warrants or judicial warrants, as confirmed by the San Francisco Sheriff's Department[/FONT]
 
Stinking California judges and juries can't get anything right. This was at least negligent homicide. He was an illegal deported many times who should not have had a gun. He was out on a crowded dock and shot the gun he wasn't supposed to have. He killed a woman.

Once again, you people who think an armed population would have prevented this, are very, very wrong. Once the shot was fired, there was no saving Kate.
 
Stinking California judges and juries can't get anything right. This was at least negligent homicide. He was an illegal deported many times who should not have had a gun. He was out on a crowded dock and shot the gun he wasn't supposed to have. He killed a woman.

Once again, you people who think an armed population would have prevented this, are very, very wrong. Once the shot was fired, there was no saving Kate.

In this case the answer is immigration enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
It would cause 10 million

If you mean that deporting innocent people is a tragedy, I agree.

being careful who we let in causes none.

Sure it does, see above

He had seven felony convictions....

...first (1) drug charge in Arizona.

In 1993, he was convicted three times in Washington state for felony (2,3,4) heroin possession and manufacturing narcotics.

Following (5) another drug conviction and jail term, this time in Oregon...

...was (6) convicted again of heroin possession in Washington state.

He pleaded guilty to (7) felony reentry
Seven victimless crimes...

And the monstrous offense for which he was being held in San Fransisco before they released him?

20-year-old felony charge of selling and possessing marijuana

The horror...
 
These absurd decisions just feed the Trump train. No justice, no peace as they like to say. Heh.
 
If you mean that deporting innocent people is a tragedy, I agree.



Sure it does, see above

Seven victimless crimes...

And the monstrous offense for which he was being held in San Fransisco before they released him?



The horror...


We we get it, you don’t believe anyone should be deported.

He stole and fired the gun for peaceful purposes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Nope, not being let in or being kicked out of a place you were not allowed is not a tragedy.

The state declares that your friends aren't allowed on your property and puts up a "trespassers will be shot" sign.

They do in fact shoot these "trespassers" or at least forcibly remove them from your property.

Cool?
 
The state declares that your friends aren't allowed on your property and puts up a "trespassers will be shot" sign.

They do in fact shoot these "trespassers" or at least forcibly remove them from your property.

Cool?

Are they citizens? Did they come here legally? Have they broken other laws in their hosts' domain? (when you are a guest it doesn't matter whether the hosts' rules are fair or right)

Personal property is not the same as national territory, since you disagree on that point there is no reason to continue this debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Are they citizens? Did they come here legally? Have they broken other laws in their hosts' domain? (when you are a guest it doesn't matter whether the hosts' rules are fair or right)

Doesn't matter, doesn't matter, and not any just ones (it sure does), resp.

Personal property is not the same as national territory, since you disagree on that point there is no reason to continue this debate.

Da komrad, I'm aware of your belief in the communal ownership of the national territory.
 
Back
Top