Johnson's running mate, Weld, is CFR scum

LibertyEagle

Paleoconservative
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
52,730
And guess what? He not only participated in the CFR's "Building a North American Community" task force, along with Heidi Cruz; HE CO-CHAIRED the damn thing!
http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102


--------------------

By Letter to the Editor


Before the extreme arm-twisting measures taken by the Bush administration to secure passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement, the promoters of world government were hard at work developing additional plans to destroy U.S. sovereignty, and speed their progress toward destroying our nation's independence.

A group calling itself the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has produced a 59-page document entitled Building a North American Community. Published by the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, this report is hardly an "independent" piece of work. Its incredible proposals, all consistent with the long-standing CFR goal of world government, call for practical elimination of the borders separating the United States from Canada and Mexico.

It recommends massive foreign aid for Mexican inclusion of illegal aliens in the U.S. Social Security system; payment for 60,000 Mexicans students to attend U.S. colleges; and even a "permanent tribunal" for settling disputes among the three nations. This proposed tribunal would have power to overrule decisions reached in our nation's courts, something that the North American Free Trade Agreement and CAFTA pacts have already achieved, though not to the complete satisfaction of these world planners.

The U.S. co-chairman of the task force producing these recommendations is former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld, a member of the CFR. At a forum convened to publicize the proposal, be delightedly announced the overall goal of "spreading economic success." One of the clear aims of these planners is to have American taxpayers foot the bill for bringing Mexico out of the poverty and misery resulting from its decades of socialistic rule.

All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2005/09/25/let_6277.shtml#.V0stpLgrKUk
 
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...d-haass-head-of-council-on-foreign-relations/

If William Weld is "scum" for being in the CFR, what does that make Trump?

Donald J. Trump, who again declined on Thursday morning to say whom he talks to about foreign affairs, held a private briefing last summer with Richard N. Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, a spokeswoman for Mr. Haass said Thursday.
The spokeswoman, Iva Zoric, released a statement after Mr. Trump made a laudatory statement about Mr. Haass in an appearance Thursday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
“I respect Richard Haass, who’s on your show a lot,” Mr. Trump said. “And I like him a lot. I have a few people that I really like and respect.’
 
trump doesnt have haas on his ticket as a running mate.. if he does then you can call him scum
 
trump doesnt have haas on his ticket as a running mate.. if he does then you can call him scum

No, he only named Richard Haas his national security advisor

Next, Trump has named as top National Security Advisor, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haass.


MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Who do you respect on foreign policy? Who do you turn to? Who do you think is a great name?

TRUMP: Well, I respect Richard Haass, who's on your show a lot. And I like him a lot.
 
Council Of Foreign Relations full of elected officials? You don't see the problem?

Ok and what does the council do? That's the question. If he was part of a group full of elected officials who play poker every Sunday and smoke cigars I wouldn't care.
 
Ok and what does the council do? That's the question. If he was part of a group full of elected officials who play poker every Sunday and smoke cigars I wouldn't care.

They make international plans of foreign relations? For example promoting NAFTA like agendas.
 
Ok and what does the council do? That's the question. If he was part of a group full of elected officials who play poker every Sunday and smoke cigars I wouldn't care.

Aside from elected officials, CFR includes people from the major media networks; anyone who is an "anchor" on a network news show is probably a member.
 
I wonder if Ron Paul will vote for them if he finds out the VP is CFR?

Ron probably would have voted for Constitution Party candidate no matter who VP was. He's been far more friendly with the CP than the LP in recent years.
 


I haven't listened to the entirety of this second one, but the beginning sounds good. It was made in 1967.



 
Last edited:
http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/03/trump-names-president-of-council-on.html

[h=3]Trump Names President of Council on Foreign Relations as Top National Security Adviser[/h]
During Thursday night's debate, when Donald Trump was asked by Megyn Kelly who he is listening to as top national security advisers, the first name Trump mentioned was Richard Haass.

Haass has been the president of the Council on Foreign Relations since July 2003, prior to which he was Director of Policy Planning for the United States Department of State and a close advisor to Secretary of State Colin Powell.

He believes that maintaining a consistent interventionist or conversely non-interventionist foreign policy would be a mistake and that each situation requires a custom-fit approach.

In May 2013, I reported on a World Affairs Council private reception for Haass, in San Francisco:
Yesterday, in San Francisco, I attended a World Affairs Council private reception for Richard Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations.

Haass is out with a new book, Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Case for Putting America's House in Order. Don't get too excited about the title of the book. It's not as though he thinks the US should mind its own business and stay out of the affairs of other countries. At the reception, Haass discussed his views and, although he wants to see a strong domestic economy, his idea of a "foreign policy that begins at home" doesn't mean he is against United States interventions globally. Though he does want to see a shift in regional focus.

During the reception he said that the United States should stop its fixation with the "Greater Middle East." He said there are no great powers in the Middle East, thus less focus needs to be given to the region. He said the focus needs to be "dialed down." On the other hand, he said the US should "dial up" involvement in Asia, with more of a military presence in the area and more diplomatic dialogue.

He said that the US can influence the area in a way favorable to its interests. He said, get this, "I don't want to leave Asia to the Asians." He compared Asia to early 20th century Europe, when Europe was the epicenter of world wars. He suggested the same could now occur in Asia. He implied that China was unstable and stated that more than 100,000 major protests are occurring in China each year.

He said Pakistan deeply troubled him, that the country has enormous problems. He contrasted the concern over Iran, which is just trying to build a nuclear bomb, and North Korea, which has 11 nuclear bombs, as minor compared to Pakistan, which has hundreds of nuclear weapons, some completed and others that soon will be completed...

Haass said there is nothing obvious that the US can do about the Syrian situation. He said that if Assad is taken out, the problem becomes one of a replacement and that given the various factions, a long civil war would be likely. He said he is against sending troops to Syria, but seemingly in contradiction to the complex problems he saw if Assad is overthrown, he said he was in favor of arming opposition to Assad.
BTW, Even Trump's answer on Afhgansitan and its importance because of its border with Pakistan suggests Haass influence.
 
Back
Top