Jennifer Rubin on the Washington post

She is shamelessly transparent in her support for the Rockefeller Republican one-world-government banker clique. And seems to think initiating extreme violence on Israel's neighbors is a good think to do with U.S. tax dollars. She has a very unpolished style with not much knowledge of history or theories regarding public policy. Lots of grammar and spelling errors go routinely unedited. She seems like an embarrassment for the Post, so I don't know why she's on the payroll.
 
Sad thing is on another anonymous message board, I swear I'm either debating Jennifer Rubin or someone who is just as irate and irrational as she.
 
khfpdXu.png
 
The thing about Rubin is she will pretend to care about any negative thing she comes across in regards to Paul, but really her gripe is foreign policy.
 
No surprise. The Washington Post is a neoconservative outlet. Their editorial board just published an editorial that sounded exactly like recent rhetoric from Bill Kristol.

Seems like everyone in the media is saying "we need to do something" regarding ISIS. I think the establishment is terrified that if we do nothing that it will set a precedent that works. On the other hand, we've already been bombing, so I'm not sure what Kristol's complaint is specifically.
 
Back
Top