"It's Hard To Believe" - Establishment Stunned As Trump Gains 'Wealthy, Well-Educated' Voters

randomname

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2,712
"It's Hard To Believe" - Establishment Stunned As Trump Gains 'Wealthy, Well-Educated' Voters

From Trump-loving Zerohedge:

Not only is Donald Trump likely to gather the most votes of any GOP Presidential nominee ever, having swept the East Coast and crushed the anti-Trump alliance between Kasich and Cruz even before it made the news cycle; but now, as Reuters reports, the GOP establishment faces an ever bigger problem. Wealthy, well-educated voters helped carry the Republican front-runner to victory this week - a demographic the famously blunt-spoken billionaire had struggled to attract in the past.

As we noted previously, with a number of states remaining including California, Trump is set to surpass current record holder George W. Bush, who received 10.8 million votes in 2000.

20160427_trumpvotes_0.PNG



And, as Reuters reports, it's not just "angry blue collar white men"...

Trump's sweep of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Connecticut and Rhode Island on Tuesday included wins in some of the richest and best-educated counties in the country - like Fairfield County, Connecticut, and Newport County, Rhode Island - and added to victories in his more traditional strongholds of white working-class neighborhoods.

Exit polls from Connecticut, Pennsylvania and Maryland showed Trump winning about half of Republican voters with college degrees, and over half of Republican voters making more than $100,000 a year.

“On its face, it is hard to believe he’d be improving with a demographic group that has been so averse to his style, his denigrating language,” said Randall Miller, a professor of American politics at Saint Joseph’s University in Pennsylvania.

“But I think people may have gotten used to Trump, he’s not as outrageous as he used to be,” he said, adding that familiarity with the businessman's brand in the Northeast may also have helped him.

But with Trump far ahead of his rivals, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Ohio Governor John Kasich, in the race for the presidential nomination, Miller said Republican voters of all stripes may become more resigned to voting for Trump.

"I think it is possible he replicates this."

Trump has historically done well in areas where the collapse of important local industries has put stress on working families - propelling his popularity among poorer white voters drawn to his rhetoric about inept government and failed international trade deals.

A Franklin and Marshall College voter survey released last week showed Trump's message of disaffection had sunk in across the state. Just under 40 percent of voters cited "government, politicians" as the most important problem facing Pennsylvania, with "unemployment, personal finances” ranked a distant second at 14 percent.

In the affluent Maryland suburbs of Montgomery and Howard counties, where more than 60 percent of whites hold college degrees, Trump claimed a smaller 40 percent share of the Republican vote. It was still enough for a first-place finish over Cruz and Kasich.

Fred Stubbs, 72, a retired accountant from Potomac, Maryland, said he voted for Trump on Tuesday because he believed the real estate mogul would improve the country's standing in the world.
 
I see Trump winning; every time a new negative issue comes up from
the puppet masters, he turns it around, gains more and wins even more.

He respects women a lot, and especially more than that other one's
husband has demonstrated. Women will give this some thought...

Many will like it when he stops beating Clinton...
by giving her a pardon after he becomes POTUS...
perhaps sometime, late in his second term...
after she has served about half of her sentence.
 
The pie charts on the bottom are telling. If Trump does get the GOP nomination, then he will do so with a remarkably low percentage of votes for him. While he hasn't yet set a record for votes for him, he has already utterly smashed the record for votes against him. Yet look at which aspect his water carriers in the MSM focus on.
 
So according to your stupid graph the voters want Kasich.

You are so full of fail these days.

Do you dispute the graph or something?

CPUd is one of the top critics of Trump and his trolls here. If you aren't willing to join him in that, then it's you who have already failed in any way that matters.
 
Do you dispute the graph or something?

CPUd is one of the top critics of Trump and his trolls here. If you aren't willing to join him in that, then it's you who have already failed in any way that matters.

Battling Trump or Cruz supporters here is not some win in my book. Getting Rand nominated would have been a win. Everything now is just raging against the machine.

Trump will be the nominee and no amount of whining about it here on our forum will change that.
 
Battling Trump or Cruz supporters here is not some win in my book. Getting Rand nominated would have been a win. Everything now is just raging against the machine.

Trump will be the nominee and no amount of whining about it here on our forum will change that.

Trump needs a majority of delegate votes at the RNC before he can be the nominee, and no amount of empty assertions (even if repeated over and over again) will change that.
 
Trump needs a majority of delegate votes at the RNC before he can be the nominee, and no amount of empty assertions (even if repeated over and over again) will change that.

Whoopeedeefuckingdo!

So what... we should hope for Cruz and Carly? Perhaps you prefer Kasich of Jeb!

It's not like Trump is keeping Ron or Rand from being president.

If you haven't noticed we won't be having a liberty friendly president no matter what.
 
Whoopeedeefuckingdo!

So what... we should hope for Cruz and Carly? Perhaps you prefer Kasich of Jeb!

It's not like Trump is keeping Ron or Rand from being president.

If you haven't noticed we won't be having a liberty friendly president no matter what.
So what... we should hope for Trump?
 
So what... we should hope for Trump?

Is this really about hope for you?

I plan on making the best of the situation regardless of which lesser of two evils gets elected. I am not looking for someone to go to DC and make my life better. That is a fools errand.

I would prefer any Republican to Hilary though. I would prefer the non-politician to a politician as well. That doesn't mean I think Trump will be some hero or even a good president, but I do think his disruption is a good thing. American politics as usual needs to be disrupted. I wish it were Rand disrupting the Washington machine, but it isn't sadly.
 
Is this really about hope for you?

I plan on making the best of the situation regardless of which lesser of two evils gets elected. I am not looking for someone to go to DC and make my life better. That is a fools errand.

I would prefer any Republican to Hilary though. I would prefer the non-politician to a politician as well. That doesn't mean I think Trump will be some hero or even a good president, but I do think his disruption is a good thing. American politics as usual needs to be disrupted. I wish it were Rand disrupting the Washington machine, but it isn't sadly.

You said:
So what... we should hope for Cruz and Carly? Perhaps you prefer Kasich of Jeb!

That's about as futile as hoping for Trump.
 
You said:


That's about as futile as hoping for Trump.

Forget the hope and change, it is futile.

Forget stressing about Trump and live life.

Keep supporting good people like Massie, Jones, Paul and Amash.
 
FYI, "well educated" means "has a BA/BS or more," which actually means...nothing.

Some of the dumbest people I ever met were in college.

All kinds of idiots graduate from good schools.

....for instance, Donald J. Trump
 
Whoopeedeefuckingdo!

So what... we should hope for Cruz and Carly? Perhaps you prefer Kasich of Jeb!

It's not like Trump is keeping Ron or Rand from being president.

If you haven't noticed we won't be having a liberty friendly president no matter what.

You're not making any sense. You're the one who said that Trump will be the nominee.
 
You're not making any sense. You're the one who said that Trump will be the nominee.

I'm sorry that you can't follow along. What can I do to help?

To make myself very clear, I do in fact think that Trump will be the nominee. Any questions I can answer?
 
I'm sorry that you can't follow along. What can I do to help?

To make myself very clear, I do in fact think that Trump will be the nominee. Any questions I can answer?

Try to follow the conversation, and when you reply to posts, make sure your reply fits the discussion that led up to it. While doing that, try to keep your own position consistent. Don't switch between actively supporting Trump for the Republican nomination in one post and pretending you're not doing that in another.
 
Try to follow the conversation, and when you reply to posts, make sure your reply fits the discussion that led up to it. While doing that, try to keep your own position consistent. Don't switch between actively supporting Trump for the Republican nomination in one post and pretending you're not doing that in another.

Considering the +rep I have gotten in this thread, I think others are following my points just fine.

I am not a Trump supporter.

I do think he will beat Hilary and I welcome that.

I don't vote for Republicrats so stumping Trump in favor of Cruz is meaningless to me.
 
Back
Top