Is the Pope a False Prophet? By Andrew P. Napolitano

Ronin Truth

Banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
22,510

Is the Pope a False Prophet?

By Andrew P. Napolitano

September 24, 2015

Congressman Thomas Massie, R-Ky., has invited me to the House of Representatives to watch Pope Francis address a joint session of Congress. This generous Methodist congressman has invited your traditionalist Roman Catholic columnist and cable TV guy to this grand event. I am going with joy because the pope is the Vicar of Christ on Earth, and his presence in Congress is historically unique. But within me is fear and trembling over what he might say.


The papacy is an office created personally by Our Lord. Its occupants are direct descendants of St. Peter. Its role and authorities have evolved over the centuries, but the core of its responsibilities has always been the preservation of traditional teachings about faith and morals and safeguarding the sacraments. While the papacy is a monarchy, the teaching authority in the Church is “the bishops under the pope.” This means that a pope intent on change ought to consult with his fellow bishops.


Before the monumental Church changes of the 1960s and 1970s that trivialized the Mass and blurred the distinctions between the clergy and the laity, Popes John XXIII and Paul VI consulted their fellow bishops at Vatican II. The consultations were fractious and belligerent, but both popes got what they wanted: a watering down of liturgical practices and an easing of rules safeguarding the sacraments, so as to make the Church more appealing and accessible to former and non-adherents.


The result was a disaster. Fewer Catholics went to Mass, confusion about former theological norms reigned, and a general tenor pervaded the faithful that the Church never really meant what it preached. Former Catholics continued to stay away, new Catholics barely showed up, and many traditional faithful became demoralized.


Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI attempted to roll this back. They succeeded in part by emphasizing traditional orthodoxy and personal piety to youth. Today, Catholic seminaries throughout the world are filled with young men who are more faithful to traditional practices and beliefs than many of their professors are.


Comes now Pope Francis to use moral relativism to take the Church in two dangerous directions. The first is an assault on the family, and the second is an assault on the free market — two favorite political targets of the left.


In the past month, without consulting his fellow bishops, the pope has weakened the sacrament of matrimony by making annulments easier to obtain. The Church cannot grant divorces because Our Lord used his own words to declare valid marriages indissoluble. But it does grant annulments.


An annulment is a judicial finding that a valid marriage never existed. This generally requires a trial, at which the party seeking the annulment must prove the existence of the marital defect from the beginning.


Fair annulment trials are costly and time consuming, often taking years from the initial filing to the final appeal. Until now. Last week, Pope Francis arbitrarily ordered the entire process to be completed in 45 days or fewer. For contested matters, a fair trial in 45 days is impossible. So, to meet his deadline, more annulments will be granted administratively, not on the merits.


It gets worse.


The Church has taught for 400 years that abortion is murder. Because the victim of an abortion is always innocent, helpless and uniquely under the control of the mother, abortion removes the participants from access to the sacraments. Until now. Last week, Pope Francis, without consulting his fellow bishops, ordered that any priest may return those who have killed a baby in a womb to the communion of the faithful. He said he did this because he was moved by the anguished cries of mothers contemplating the murder of their babies.


I doubt he will defend these decisions before Congress. He will, instead, assault the free market, which he blames for poverty, pollution and the mass migrations into Europe away from to worn-torn areas in the Middle East.


In his papal exhortation on capitalism, Pope Francis spectacularly failed to appreciate the benefits of capitalism to the health, wealth and safety of the poor. Instead, he has reworked the Peronism of his youth to advocate government-mandated redistribution of wealth and to condemn those who work hard, employ others and achieve wealth — even when they give some of that wealth to the Church.


When he is in St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City later this week, he should take note of the recent and beautiful $200 million facelift. It was paid in full by rich Catholic capitalists who employed hardworking artisans and laborers to do the work.


The pope probably also will tell Congress that the world is an inherently unhealthy place because of human work. He will embrace the highly questionable green science of those who want the government to tell us how to live, outside our homes and inside — more Thomas Piketty than St. Thomas Aquinas.


The pope has seriously disappointed those who believe the Roman Catholic Church preserves and teaches the Truth. The Truth is Christ risen and unity with Him. It is not a debate about the minimum wage or air conditioning.


Pope Francis is popular on the world stage, and the crowds love him. But if he fails in his basic duties as the pope, if his concern is more for secular than sacred, if he aids the political agenda of the atheistic left, he is a false prophet leading his flock to a dangerous place, where there is more central planning and less personal liberty.


Reprinted with the author’s permission.


The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano


Andrew P. Napolitano [send him mail], a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written nine books on the U.S. Constitution. The most recent is Suicide Pact: The Radical Expansion of Presidential Powers and the Lethal Threat to American Liberty. To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit creators.com.


Copyright © 2015 Andrew P. Napolitano
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/09/andrew-p-napolitano/is-the-pope-a-false-prophet/

Copyright © 2015 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are provided.
 
The Pope is a false prophet because he doesn't preach justification by faith alone, not because he is a Communist.
 
The pope said he's not as much of a leftist as people portray him as being, and his speech reflected that. He also called for peace. And got a standing ovation from a room full of hypocrites who could go a long way toward delivering that peace, but won't.
 
“I have as much authority as the Pope. I just don’t have as many people who believe it.” -- George Carlin
 
The pope said he's not as much of a leftist as people portray him as being, and his speech reflected that. He also called for peace. And got a standing ovation from a room full of hypocrites who could go a long way toward delivering that peace, but won't.

Who cares?
 
Who cares?

The people who come here trying to make the world a better place for the least of their bretheren, rather than spending all their time sitting in judgment, trying to stick people in categories, and trying to figure out some way to feel superior to everyone.

And thanks for asking.
 
The people who come here trying to make the world a better place for the least of their bretheren, rather than spending all their time sitting in judgment, trying to stick people in categories, and trying to figure out some way to feel superior to everyone.

And thanks for asking.

Did Jesus put people in categories?
 
Did Jesus put people in categories?

He separated the wheat from the chaff. Of course, He's actually qualified to do so, as He actually knows what's in their hearts. He's unique in that respect. Completely unique.

He also placed a lot of emphasis on differentiating the hypocrites. Like the people who sat around arguing theology while people were suffering, then loudly proclaimed that they were doing His work all the while.
 
He separated the wheat from the chaff. Of course, He actually knows what's in their hearts.

He also placed a lot of emphasis on differentiating the hypocrites. Like the people who sat around arguing theology while people were suffering, then loudly proclaimed that they were doing His work all the while.

So Jesus put people into all kinds of categories, didn't He?
 
The people who come here trying to make the world a better place for the least of their bretheren, rather than spending all their time sitting in judgment, trying to stick people in categories, and trying to figure out some way to feel superior to everyone.

And thanks for asking.

Did Jesus sit in judgment of people?
 
No. He puts them in two. Those who do this unto the least of these His brothers, and those who do that to them. That, by my count, would be two.

You just said he put people in to the category of hypocrite. Did He do that? What about liar, adulterer, sinner, sheep, goat, tax collector, king, evil, Pharisee?
 
No. He puts them in two. Those who do this unto the least of these His brothers, and those who do that to them. That, by my count, would be two.

Matthew 7:21. Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
22 Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?'
23 And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'
//
 
The Papacy is the office of false prophecy, so it follows that any personal holding the office will be a false prophet by sheer default of what the position represents. The powers that the Pope has claimed are extra-scriptural, insubordinate, and idolatrous. Napolitano has it backwards, Francis isn't a false prophet because he's a communist, he has embraced communism largely because he is a false prophet, descended from a heretical holy order that has a track record for putting communists in power.

The Pope is a false prophet because he is a Paulinist, South American leftist, Jesuit.

Paul's 2nd Epistle to the Thessalonians, Chapter 2 is the primary scriptural basis for the Protestant Reformation against The Papacy, and there is nothing ANYWHERE in Paul's writings supporting the office of the Papacy or anything comparable to it. If St. Paul were alive today the Jesuits would probably assassinate him. Calling the Pope a Paulinist (a stupid, made up term) makes about as much sense as calling George Carlin a social conservative.
 
So you think you are of the same authority and knowledge as the Master and thus your condemnation of others whom you know not is justified?

Just because he's afraid they finally appointed a pope who has a better chance of getting into the Kingdom than he does does not mean you need to help him hijack this thread.

I'd rather talk about the pope's speech than watch our resident false prophet make an ass of himself yet again, arguing over whether Jesus would consider occupations 'categories', or trying to avow that 'sheep and goats' isn't just another way to say the same thing I said, and other sophist nonsense.

The Papacy is the office of false prophecy, so it follows that any personal holding the office will be a false prophet by sheer default of what the position represents.

If I thought the corrupt office automatically corrupted any man who held it, I wouldn't be here trying to get Rand Paul into the presidency.

Francis is an individual, and if he wants to take on the taint of a tainted office in the hope that this office will enable him to do some good in spite of the taint, I will applaud him individually for it. Because I'm a libertarian, and that's the way libertarians should roll.
 
Last edited:
So you think you are of the same authority and knowledge as the Master and thus your condemnation of others whom you know not is justified?

Same authority? No. But Jesus admonished people to judge with right judgment, so a Christian must do this. Furthermore, a Christian does not have to know the Pope to judge him, one just has to listen to the false gospel he preaches.

For example, I don't know you personally, but I judged you because you preach paganism. That is a correct judgement based on the Bible.
 
The Papacy is the office of false prophecy, so it follows that any personal holding the office will be a false prophet by sheer default of what the position represents. The powers that the Pope has claimed are extra-scriptural, insubordinate, and idolatrous. Napolitano has it backwards, Francis isn't a false prophet because he's a communist, he has embraced communism largely because he is a false prophet, descended from a heretical holy order that has a track record for putting communists in power.



Paul's 2nd Epistle to the Thessalonians, Chapter 2 is the primary scriptural basis for the Protestant Reformation against The Papacy, and there is nothing ANYWHERE in Paul's writings supporting the office of the Papacy or anything comparable to it. If St. Paul were alive today the Jesuits would probably assassinate him. Calling the Pope a Paulinist (a stupid, made up term) makes about as much sense as calling George Carlin a social conservative.

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en......1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..2.7.1376.bN9JyXhPWGs
 
Back
Top