Is SCOTUS Justice John Roberts Considering Retiring for Personal Reasons? [debunked]

bobbyw24

Banned
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
14,097
John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, is seriously considering stepping down from the nation’s highest court for personal reasons, RadarOnline.com has learned exclusively.



Roberts, known for his conservative judicial philosophy, has served on the Supreme Court since 2005, having been nominated by President George W. Bush after the death of former Chief William Rehnquist.



RadarOnline.com has been told that Roberts, 55, could announce his decision at any time.

The decision paves the way for President Barack Obama to make his second appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court following his first, Sonia Sotomayor.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...ef-justice-john-roberts-considering-step-down
 
"White males need not apply to the first Presidential court nomination."
"Straight people need not apply to the second Presidential court nomination."
That'll be fun.

Just what we need, an enormous lurch towards idiocy in the highest court, vice the slow drip they are accustomed to.
 
This being announced on a pop culture website? Sorry, but I not buying it.
 
This being announced on a pop culture website? Sorry, but I not buying it.

True-we must consider the source-but if it does happen, it cannot be good for liberty minded/smaller government advocates, could it???
 
True-we must consider the source-but if it does happen, it cannot be good for liberty minded/smaller government advocates, could it???

Of course. With Obama at the helm I have the greatest wish for the health and longevity of all of the current members of the court.
 
Of course. With Obama at the helm I have the greatest wish for the health and longevity of all of the current members of the court.

And if Ron Paul gets elected hope they all retire so he can appoint people like tom woods, heh.
 
For what it's worth, I was just watching Fox News (yeah, I know) and they said it was a false report. Supposedly completely debunked.
 
Probably a false report, true, but keep in mind there are conservative justices (Scalia, Thomas) who are in their 60's now, and might be vulnerable to health issues.
 
Drudge had this up 30 minutes ago that he may be stepping down. Then they had text underneath the article saying something to the effect of they called someone there at the Supreme Court and they said they know nothing about him maybe stepping down. Then it said something like they were getting more information. I just checked Drudge again and all that information is gone now. Not even a link to the original story.

*EDIT*
ya I still had the drudgereport archived in my browser history. I'll show you what they said.
(The link was to http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...ef-justice-john-roberts-considering-step-down )
justice2g.jpg
 
Last edited:
UPDATE: John Roberts NOT Resigning;

UPDATE: John Roberts NOT Resigning; 'RadarOnline' Retracts Claim Supreme Court Chief Justice Considering Quitting
First Posted: 03- 4-10 01:03 PM | Updated: 03- 4-10 01:56 PM


Get Breaking News Alerts

Share Comments 257
UPDATE 1:45 AM ET-- RadarOnline retracts story. RadarOnline has added an update saying that Chief Justice John Roberts is not resigning:

Update: RadarOnline.com has obtained new information that Justice Roberts will NOT resign. The justice will be staying on the bench.
Gossip site RadarOnline is reporting that Chief Justice John Roberts is "seriously considering" stepping down from the Supreme Court "for personal reasons".

Roberts, a staunch conservative, was appointed by President Bush and has served on the court since 2005. While RadarOnline doesn't give a reason for the possible retirement, Roberts, 55, has suffered two seizures, in 2007 and 1993. Time magazine speculated in 2007 that Roberts may have epilepsy. However, the Supreme Court said after the 2007 seizure that Roberts was "fully recovered" and a neurological evaluation "revealed no cause for concern."

Sources told RadarOnline that retirement announcement could come "at any time."

A spokesperson for the Supreme Court has not yet returned a request for comment from Huffington Post.
 
True or not it's sad that liberty can live or die at the hands of a few unelected federal judges.
 
True or not it's sad that liberty can live or die at the hands of a few unelected federal judges.

the speculation is so undignified. not the people doing the speculkation but that fact that there is a position that is so powerful that it matters that much.

same w/ fed
 
The Story Behind Chief Justice John Roberts's 'Retirement'

Feed: Above the Law
Posted on: Thursday, March 04, 2010 4:21 PM
Author: David Lat
Subject: Anatomy of a Rumor: The Story Behind Chief Justice John Roberts's 'Retirement'



john roberts.jpgEveryone is wondering: Where did that erroneous rumor of an imminent retirement by Chief Justice John Roberts come from? The gossip spread like wildfire, triggering thousands of texts, blog posts, and emails -- a few hundred of them to the ATL tips line -- before Radar, which first published the rumor, retracted its report.

We were skeptical, which is one reason why we didn't write about the gossip as quickly as some other outlets. We reached out to the Supreme Court's Public Information Office after we heard the rumor, and we didn't want to write about it until we heard back from the PIO (or at least gave them a little time to respond).

Of course, we have many Supreme Court sources other than the official ones -- and they reacted with extreme skepticism when we ran the Radar report by them. One of our SCOTUS experts actually laughed out loud after we (sheepishly) asked, "Have you heard anything about a possible Roberts retirement?" This source noted that JGR would sooner die -- literally -- than give Obama the chance to appoint his successor.

Like many a promising legal career, the Roberts resignation rumor traces its origins to a 1L class at Georgetown University Law Center....

Here's an account of what went down in Professor Peter Tague's criminal law class this morning, from a 1L at Georgetown Law:

Today's class was partially on the validity of informants not explaining their sources. [Professor Tague] started off class at around 9 am EST by telling us not to tell anyone, but that we might find it interesting that tomorrow, Roberts would be announcing his retirement for health concerns. He refused to tell anyone how he knew. Then, at around 9:30, he let everyone in on the joke.

Note the timestamps on the Radar posts. The first one came out at 6:10 a.m., i.e., the Pacific Time equivalent of 9:10 a.m. Eastern time. The retraction / update came out at 6:36 a.m., i.e., the
Pacific Time equivalent of 9:36 a.m. Eastern -- shortly after Professor Tague let his class in on the joke.

A second Georgetown Law student confirms this:

Our criminal justice professor started our 9 am lecture with the news that roberts will be resigning tomorow for health reasons -- that he could not handle the administrative burdens of the job. He would not say how he knows -- but halfway through our lecture on the credibility and reliability of informants he revealed that the Roberts rumor was made up to show how someone you ordinarily think is credible and reliable (ie a law professor) can disseminate inaccurate information.

By then the horse was out of the barn -- and running at a gallop:

etween the hour when the class began and when he revealed that he made it up, plenty of students txted and IM'ed their friends and family.... [So] there's a very good chance that the Roberts rumor that spread like wildfire on the internet was sparked by an eccentric law professor trying to make a point.

We've reached out to the aforementioned eccentric law professor, by telephone and by email, but we haven't heard back from him yet. If we do, we will update this post.

And that, dear readers, is what we do around here -- we talk to multiple sources, including the sources most directly involved in a given story, in the course of our reporting. So if the JGR retirement rumor leads to the usual bashing of online news sources for purported unreliability, please don't lump us in with the other outlets. Thanks.

Earlier: ATL Exclusive: John Roberts Is Still Chief Justice!
 
Back
Top