In-N-Out Burger Statement on Vaccine Passport Enforcement

[Brian4Liberty]

You can read the full statement from the San Francisco In-N-Out Burger here:

On Thursday, October 14, the San Francisco Department of Public Health closed our restaurant at 333 Jefferson Street because In-N-Out Burger Associates (employees) were not preventing the entry of Customers who were not carrying proper vaccination documentation. Our store properly and clearly posted signage to communicate local vaccination requirements.

After closing our restaurant, local regulators informed us that our restaurant Associates must actively intervene by demanding proof of vaccination and photo identification from every Customer, then act as enforcement personnel by barring entry for any Customers without the proper documentation.

As a Company, In-N-Out Burger strongly believes in the highest form of customer service and to us that means serving all Customers who visit us and making all Customers feel welcome. We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government. It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant Associates to segregate Customers into those who may be served and those who may not, whether based on the documentation they carry, or any other reason.

We fiercely disagree with any government dictate that forces a private company to discriminate against customers who choose to patronize their business. This is clear governmental overreach and is intrusive, improper, and offensive.
...
https://abc7news.com/in-n-out-sf-san-francisco-in-n-out-burger/11144750/

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

It is hard to support a closed business.

 

[CaptUSA]

It is hard to support a closed business.

Well, it's only one restaurant in the city limits that closed. They have many more.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Well, it's only one restaurant in the city limits that closed. They have many more.

If there was one anywhere me I would support them. If I was in charge of artwork on display, I would pull all my artwork from any woke museum too.

 

[devil21]

I love their stance and glad to see them being so open about it but I have a hard time believing the chain's attorneys don't know that by registering the business with the State of California the owner has turned over ownership, and thus ultimate control, of the business to the State. State becomes trustee of the registered business entity and therefore legal titleholder to the business and responsible for "management" of how the business asset operates under Cali laws and rules. "Owner" of the business/franchise becomes merely a beneficial operator of the business, entitled to receive benefits as beneficiary (ie money/profit/usage) but is not true legal owner anymore.

 

[sdsubball23]

I went to eat there yesterday in southern california to show my support.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I love their stance and glad to see them being so open about it but I have a hard time believing the chain's attorneys don't know that by registering the business with the State of California the owner has turned over ownership, and thus ultimate control, of the business to the State. State becomes trustee of the registered business entity and therefore legal titleholder to the business and responsible for "management" of how the business asset operates under Cali laws and rules. "Owner" of the business/franchise becomes merely a beneficial operator of the business, entitled to receive benefits as beneficiary (ie money/profit/usage) but is not true legal owner anymore.

I'm sure they do.

None of us own anything.

We're all just serfs, squatting on the King's land.