I'm Finally Leaving America's Crazed Police State

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
I'm Finally Leaving America's Crazed Police State

David Seaman
Business Insider
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:35 CDT

policestate.jpg

© benfrank.net

Dudes, I'm done with this. I'm leaving the United States today, and won't be back for a while. I recently visited my childhood hometown and noticed a whole bunch of brand new surveillance cameras at nearly every intersection and street corner; this is just a town, mind you, not some city of national or international significance.

After doing some research, it turns out the cameras are "high-definition" 24/7 surveillance cameras, manufactured and operated by Sprint Nextel Corp, and paid for through federal Department of Homeland Security grants to the town's local police department.

In fact, the number of these cameras in my hometown has reportedly tripled over the past couple years. There are as many as six of them at each intersection, they aren't red light traffic cameras (topic for another article altogether, though). Here's a photo I took of the cameras.

Do you really think these are there to make your 10 minute drive to the Applebee's safe from terrorists? Do you?

On another note, I was recently at a ball game: they now ask you to rise twice to sing the national anthem and pledge your allegiance. As a child, I only remember this occurring once, normally at the start of the game.

It was recently revealed that the NSA, according to a former high-ranking official there, is building "dossiers" on MILLIONS of American citizens and may be routinely spying on countless Americans on U.S. soil, in clear violation of our laws and principles as a nation.

Moving on... The New York Times recently claimed: "Cellphone carriers reported that they responded to a startling 1.3 million demands for subscriber information last year from law enforcement agencies seeking text messages, caller locations and other information in the course of investigations."

That's just last year. And that number is quite conservative, as it does not include shadow wiretapping programs such as the NSA's project(s).

Is it paranoid to think you're being watched.... when you are actually being watched?

America has turned into a full-blown police state. Our economy is sick, and politicians refuse to fix it, choosing instead to fund outrageous, scary, illegal programs which violate our rights and our privacy. Ironically, one of the few sectors where recent grads are finding work is in law enforcement and government-sponsored surveillance.

All of these things would be bad, but I would still have hope if Americans were getting outraged -- if they were demanding answers and asking for a rollback of the new surveillance cameras, the warrantless wiretapping programs, the new invasive TSA procedures, etc.

But they aren't. Most people I talk to just don't care, and they think I'm some kind of weirdo for interrupting them from their reality TV and 40-ounce high-fructose corn syrup soda. It's the apathy and indifference that scares me more than any headline about the government watching us.

I don't see a bright future for us unless we begin to care, and begin to demand accountability. In the history of the world, the combination of a) totalitarian police state b) rapid rollback of civil rights c) blind nationalistic pride and d) a public that doesn't care has NEVER led to improvements in the quality of life. Instead, it normally leads to mass injustice and misery.

I hope people begin to speak up. I hope they email and call their Senators. I hope they share articles like this one with their friends, since the establishment broadcast media refuses to cover the police state's rapid growth -- maybe they are in on it, or maybe (more likely) they realize that viewers want Kim Kardashian segments, not NSA whistleblowers like William Binney.

Sad, but true.
 
After doing some research, it turns out the cameras are "high-definition" 24/7 surveillance cameras, manufactured and operated by Sprint Nextel Corp, and paid for through federal Department of Homeland Security grants to the town's local police department.

Yet another nexus point of the corpo/government facist state.
 
But exactly where are you going that you expect more freedom? If its to another First World nation you're just trading police states.
 
Apparently there's actually less rule of law in most counties. And I hope you're not headed to the U.K. where there's a super high concentration of surveillance cameras. Would be interested to know what country you selected, if you can say.

There was a good article posted on the forums a while back but I can't find it now. It was by a guy who had left the US and lived in several countries and pointed out how they were actually all less free than the US. Maybe somebody else here can come up with it.
 
To those who ask where is the author going, maybe it matters not so much where they are going but that they leave? At least in trying to control its citizens the distance makes things slightly more difficult than those of us who remain because we believe that as bad as it is here everywhere else is worse. I think of the government as an abusive spouse relationship with regards to its citizens. The abusive spouse might still control your actions if you run, but it is not nearly as satisfying or as easy for them to do so...( and there is that issue of how much it will cost them to actually get that tax money from you to support their surveillance addiction esp. when you are a nomad!)
 
Apparently there's actually less rule of law in most counties. And I hope you're not headed to the U.K. where there's a super high concentration of surveillance cameras. Would be interested to know what country you selected, if you can say.

There was a good article posted on the forums a while back but I can't find it now. It was by a guy who had left the US and lived in several countries and pointed out how they were actually all less free than the US. Maybe somebody else here can come up with it.

That - the fight is in the US. If we can't turn the tide here, where there is at least still a pretense that citizens have unalienable rights, it is all over.
 
Apparently there's actually less rule of law in most counties. And I hope you're not headed to the U.K. where there's a super high concentration of surveillance cameras. Would be interested to know what country you selected, if you can say.

There was a good article posted on the forums a while back but I can't find it now. It was by a guy who had left the US and lived in several countries and pointed out how they were actually all less free than the US. Maybe somebody else here can come up with it.

Unless he decides to live a fairly primitive lifestyle, in places like Panama or somewhere in south America. I know some Americans who have made that choice and seem to be happy with that decision. Jesse Ventura, for instance, lives in Baja, Mexico off the grid--no electricity and no pavement.

I truly believe we have to leave a good portion of the technology, that will eventually enslave us--it can be done here in America, if you do it right.
 
To those who ask where is the author going, maybe it matters not so much where they are going but that they leave? At least in trying to control its citizens the distance makes things slightly more difficult than those of us who remain because we believe that as bad as it is here everywhere else is worse. I think of the government as an abusive spouse relationship with regards to its citizens. The abusive spouse might still control your actions if you run, but it is not nearly as satisfying or as easy for them to do so...( and there is that issue of how much it will cost them to actually get that tax money from you to support their surveillance addiction esp. when you are a nomad!)

That is correct.

The cameras are one very in your face point of the government owning you. Owning the citizens is what government is all about now. Police acts as owners of the whole place. Homeland Security also acts as owners. We belong to them. The idea for the young people is to get a job with the government so that they can enter that class of being the owners of everyone else. Then there are the rest of those who like being owned by them because it gives them security and satisfaction of belonging to someone.

What is the largest growth in college campus? Degrees in law enforcement and criminology, etc. Once young people take these courses, they look for opportunities in ownership. Owning property or homes is not what's in. Owning people as law enforcement and government officers is what's in. This is a government owned country now. That's why Romney is so desperate to own it.
 
Last edited:
Woke up this morning to this lovely story...

Boston's status as top terror target helps get T cameras

There's a lot of grant money involved in all this, from DHS, so it's a no brainer that surveillance cameras are going to spread wherever the flow of money goes.

And the thing is this is being done with newly printed money. Our Congress people don't need us anymore. The Treasury prints all the money they need to own its citizens.
 
Someone should be following the money trail and see who in gov't or congress has ties to the companies making these cameras and go viral with it. Then find out if it is even constitutional for the DHS to give grants for it. Same crap that is funding domestic drones. There has to be a loophole or at the very least a way to shoot it down it the court of public opinion.
 
Back
Top