His example sucks (and is irrelevant to the bill they proposed) but gold does not prevent inflation from occurring.
In a shocking turn of events, Rep. Erpelding has admitted that he screwed up in a response to an email from a reader at Economicpolicyjournal.com
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2017/03/a-response-from-idaho-representative-on.html
But to the OP, I can see how he gets confused. Its sorta like a wish in water, you use the dollar so much that it becomes the default measure of value. To the point that if something increases in price, they cannot see the dollar as the culprit cos it is the dollar.
Why are there democrats in Idaho ?
I think there's this guy, a handful of college students, and a really old man who remembers William Jennings Bryan. And that's it.
A classical gold standard would be inflation-proof (monetary inflation, that is. Price inflation is another thing) by its nature. That's why bankers and politicians hate it.Yes, but gold money would have less inflation because you cannot print gold willy nilly like you can do with the dollar. Nothing is a 100% safe guard against inflation.
But to the OP, I can see how he gets confused. Its sorta like a wish in water, you use the dollar so much that it becomes the default measure of value. To the point that if something increases in price, they cannot see the dollar as the culprit cos it is the dollar.
Jesus, you'd think one of his aides would've double checked this first before letting him state it as fact with such a big smile on his face.