I Received a Response From Debbie Hopper on Money Bomb

Sentinelrv

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
2,811
UPDATE: I received a reply from Debbie Hopper on this...

Thanks for sharing your concerns.

"To my knowledge, we are not promoting the July 4 money bomb.

For liberty,

Debbie Hopper
www.RonPaul2012.com".

Don't email the campaign anymore as we have received a response from them on this issue.

---

I emailed Trevor Lyman to tell him about the opposition toward July 4th and asked him to check out some of the discussion about it on the forum. I asked him to instead switch his focus toward the July 19th Ready Ames Fire money bomb, because there's a great deal of enthusiasm building around that date. He replied back to me with his opinion on the situation.

I won't post any quotes without his permission, but l will tell you that there is nothing that will change his mind about canceling July 4th, not even an email campaign convincing him to do so. Judging from his responses in the large 42 page thread that's now on the fundraising board, I'm sure you can imagine what his reply was to me. But the fact of the matter is that he won't be canceling it, so we need to make a decision here on what to do. He's going to be promoting July 4th through his email list, so many people that do not visit this forum will get his email and start promoting it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this in my opinion. More money for the campaign. If you wish to support it then go ahead and do so. You can even donate on that day if you wish to.

My major concern though is whether the campaign will endorse July 4th or wait and endorse the much preferred date of July 19th. For those who believe having two money bombs within 14 days of each other is a huge mistake, my suggestion would be to contact the campaign and tell them your concerns. Make sure they completely understand that you don't want them to endorse July 4th as an official money bomb date.

June 5th wasn't being supported until the campaign sent an email out about it. Because of that, we were then forced to get behind that date or allow the campaign's fundraising day to be painted as a failure by the media. Don't let that happen this time. Tell the campaign personally that you don't want them to endorse July 4th, state your reasons and then suggest that they do endorse July 19th. If we do nothing and the campaign endorses the 4th by sending out an email about it, then it will already be too late, and we'll be forced to interrupt the promotion of Ready Ames Fire to instead support the promotion of July 4th. We need our entire focus on promoting the 19th with no interruptions to knock us off track. Momentum is building toward something huge. We wouldn't want to lose that momentum.

So if you agree with this, we need contact information for the campaign. I don't have it, so if somebody does, please post it here for others who need it.

---

EDIT: I was instructed to contact debh at ronpaul2012.com. I"m not sure if this is the right person to contact, but I suggest you do the same or contact the person in the campaign that's most responsible for this. Here is the email I sent her...

Hi Debbie, it was suggested for me to email this to you. If I've sent this to the wrong person could you please let me know who would be responsible for this?

The majority of grassroots supporters on RonPaulForums.com have been supporting the July 19th Ready Ames Fire date as the next official money bomb. For a poll showing the amount of support over the July 4th/5th date, check out the following link...

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?296954-Vote-on-the-next-moneybomb(s)!

The reason why I'm emailing you is that we're concerned that the campaign is going to endorse and promote the July 4th/5th date as the next money bomb. We do not want the campaign to endorse this date. As for reasons why, most of the reasons are located in the discussion in the forum thread I just linked. Just a couple examples would be that it's on a date where people are not at home. They're traveling or outside the house having parties. Also, instead of allowing us to coordinate an end of the quarter donation push, it would encourage people to save their money until the beginning of the next month, something I know the campaign would not want.

The biggest reason of all though is that endorsing July 4th would sabotage the July 19th Ready Ames Fire money bomb. There is a lot of enthusiasm building on the internet around this date. I'm predicting it to become one of the largest money bombs we've had since 2007. The July 19th money bomb has almost 1,300 attendees on Facebook as of this writing where the July 4th money bomb has only 38 attendees. There is just no excitement for it. If the campaign endorses and promotes that date, it will have the unfortunate side effect of redirecting promotion for the July 19th money bomb, which is ONLY 14 DAYS LATER! That would be a massive error by the campaign in my opinion. It would sabotage July 19th and result in two sub-standard money bombs. We need our full focus to be on the promotion of July 19th.

Trevor Lyman is running the one on the 4th/5th. I've emailed him detailing the concerns of the grassroots and he responded back by telling me that there's no chance he will cancel his date. He will be promoting the 4th/5th through his email lists, so I ask the campaign now to not make the mistake of endorsing that date in any mass email. Many people are upset that Trevor is acting on this without any discussion on the issue. He seems to be acting alone on this and most are afraid he's going to sabotage July 19th. So please, allow him to promote that date by himself. It will help guarantee a donation bump on the 4th without creating any of the expectations from the media that would result from a campaign endorsement email. Like I said, doing so would force the grassroots to redirect attention away from promoting a much more popular money bomb. We also risk the chance of coming up short on July 4th because of the grassroots opposition to the date, which would attract negative media attention. If you could give us confirmation after you've made your decision that no endorsement will be made, it would ease our fears. We all want Dr. Paul to get as much money as possible, so we believe that an end of the quarter push followed by an endorsement of the July 19th money bomb is the best strategy to go with. Thanks for your time and I hope you understand the seriousness of this issue.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing wrong with a spontaneous minibomb on July 4th...

Read my post again. I said that you can promote it and donate to it if you want to. The problem comes when the campaign gets behind it. Then it goes from spontaneous to official, forcing us to stop our promotion of July 19th and switch gears toward promoting July 4th. When that happens, July 19th loses the momentum it was building, resulting in two sub-par money bombs. Ensuring the campaign doesn't endorse July 4th means our full focus will be on promoting July 19th.
 
Last edited:
So if you agree with this, we need contact information for the campaign. I don't have it, so if somebody does, please post it here for others who need it.

Email Debbie Hopper (debh at ronpaul2012.com).

FWIW, I haven't read any of the moneybomb discussion threads and don't have an opinion on this myself, but is it possible the campaign would prefer to get another cash infusion before July 19?
 
Last edited:
That is not Sentinelrv's point either, I think.

Edit:


Or is it? I don't know and will stop speaking for others.

Well, I'm not sure where the campaign is getting their information on what the next money bomb date is. Maybe they're getting it from the DailyPaul money bomb calendar. Asking them to take the date down would ensure the campaign only sees July 19th. The point of all this is so that the campaign DOES NOT send out an email promoting July 4th as the next date. Once that has been done, there is no turning back. It needs to be prevented, and that requires us to make contact with the campaign, letting them know our concerns about this.
 
Last edited:
Is this the same Trevor who started the Legalize Gold and Silver Moneybomb? I've heard from multiple people that he originally had the link to donate pointed directly to his personal paypal account.
 
Well, I'm not sure where the campaign is getting their information on what the next money bomb date is. Maybe they're getting it from the DailyPaul money bomb calendar. Asking them to take the date down would ensure the campaign only sees July 19th. The point of all this is so that the campaign DOES NOT send out an email promoting July 4th as the next date. Once that has been done, there is no turning back. It needs to be prevented, and that requires us to make contact with the campaign, letting them know our concerns about this.

I support your objective. +rep for you acting on your concerns.
 
FWIW, I haven't read any of the moneybomb discussion threads and don't have an opinion on this myself, but is it possible the campaign would prefer to get another cash infusion before July 19?

I'm sure they would, but is it worth sabotaging July 19th? In my opinion it's not. After July 19th, the campaign will still have almost a month before the straw poll to use the money.
 
Last edited:
Is this the same Trevor who started the Legalize Gold and Silver Moneybomb? I've heard from multiple people that he originally had the link to donate pointed directly to his personal paypal account.

You must be referring to the donation link on that website to help support them and their website. I believe some were concerned that people might mistake that link for the actual donation link. Some were asking him to move the link to the bottom of the page to avoid any confusion, but I'm not sure if that was ever done.
 
Alright, here is the email I sent to Debbie. If there is a more official person in charge of this, please post their contact details. Here is the email...

Hi Debbie, it was suggested for me to email this to you. If I've sent this to the wrong person could you please let me know who would be responsible for this?

The majority of grassroots supporters on RonPaulForums.com have been supporting the July 19th Ready Ames Fire date as the next official money bomb. For a poll showing the amount of support over the July 4th/5th date, check out the following link...

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?296954-Vote-on-the-next-moneybomb(s)!

The reason why I'm emailing you is that we're concerned that the campaign is going to endorse and promote the July 4th/5th date as the next money bomb. We do not want the campaign to endorse this date. As for reasons why, most of the reasons are located in the discussion in the forum thread I just linked. Just a couple examples would be that it's on a date where people are not at home. They're traveling or outside the house having parties. Also, instead of allowing us to coordinate an end of the quarter donation push, it would encourage people to save their money until the beginning of the next month, something I know the campaign would not want.

The biggest reason of all though is that endorsing July 4th would sabotage the July 19th Ready Ames Fire money bomb. There is a lot of enthusiasm building on the internet around this date. I'm predicting it to become one of the largest money bombs we've had since 2007. The July 19th money bomb has almost 1,300 attendees on Facebook as of this writing where the July 4th money bomb has only 38 attendees. There is just no excitement for it. If the campaign endorses and promotes that date, it will have the unfortunate side effect of redirecting promotion for the July 19th money bomb, which is ONLY 14 DAYS LATER! That would be a massive error by the campaign in my opinion. It would sabotage July 19th and result in two sub-standard money bombs. We need our full focus to be on the promotion of July 19th.

Trevor Lyman is running the one on the 4th/5th. I've emailed him detailing the concerns of the grassroots and he responded back by telling me that there's no chance he will cancel his date. He will be promoting the 4th/5th through his email lists, so I ask the campaign now to not make the mistake of endorsing that date in any mass email. Many people are upset that Trevor is acting on this without any discussion on the issue. He seems to be acting alone on this and most are afraid he's going to sabotage July 19th. So please, allow him to promote that date by himself. It will help guarantee a donation bump on the 4th without creating any of the expectations from the media that would result from a campaign endorsement email. Like I said, doing so would force the grassroots to redirect attention away from promoting a much more popular money bomb. We also risk the chance of coming up short on July 4th because of the grassroots opposition to the date, which would attract negative media attention. If you could give us confirmation after you've made your decision that no endorsement will be made, it would ease our fears. We all want Dr. Paul to get as much money as possible, so we believe that an end of the quarter push followed by an endorsement of the July 19th money bomb is the best strategy to go with. Thanks for your time and I hope you understand the seriousness of this issue.
 
Thank you Trevor for dividing the moneybomb :(

We all need to just donate when we have the funds. Moneybombs are not going to work ever again like they did in 07-08. The concept is great but not even our own grassroots can seem to come together anymore. It's all about the egos now.

I think that Ready, Ames, Fire had the potential to be the largest moneybomb of this cycle so far..... it won't now. We maybe will get lucky to get a million. July 4th is going to fizzle with no pop.

Why is this bad? biggest of course is the campaign needs money, and they need it NOW!! Secondly though is the negative publicity. We already had articles about the other moneybombs falling short. The media watch these forms. they will start openly addressing that "is the Ron Paul Grassroots coming apart" and they will be saying "We lost our moneybomb magic"

This will look bad on us, and even worse for support of Ron Paul

Again Trevor Lyman, Thank you for being a prick.

[Admin: User temp banned for this post]
 
Here is my response to Trevor. Yes, I'm trying again to plead with him, but I doubt it will get us anywhere...

Thanks for responding Trevor. I didn't realize at first that you had nothing to do with planning the Ready Ames Fire money bomb. I thought you were in charge of it also, so I apologize if I made it sound like I wanted you to abandon the work you had done so that another project not under your control could thrive.

Still though, I don't think you understand the importance of what's going on here. This is much bigger than your controversy with the people running RonPaulForums. You mentioned that your pledges for July 4th eclipses the amount of people in support of July 19th. This is wrong. Neither dates have had much advertising yet, but as you can see here...

http://www.facebook.com/#!/event.php?eid=221469004546764

Ready Ames Fire already has almost 1,300 attendees. There's something about the date and theme of this money bomb that is creating a much larger charge of enthusiasm. It seems to be advertising itself well and that total still has 37 days to grow. There is a feeling on the forum that this date will be as large as the money bombs of 2007. Judging from the total on that Facebook page, you can't say that this has anything to do with Josh or Bryan's anti-Trevor attitude on the forum. Yes, maybe the poll I linked in the previous email did, but this Facebook page draws from people outside of RonPaulForums.

You may not agree, but I believe if the campaign sends out an email endorsing the 4th/5th, it will force a redirection of focus away from the promotion of the 19th, which is only 14 days after your date, causing it to be less successful than it could be. The campaign also wants an end of the quarter push. Your money bomb on the 4th would encourage people to hold their money until after the FEC deadline, which the 19th would not cause. If we were to come together to focus all our energies on this one date instead of creating a division of resources like what's going on now, we would be able to raise so much more money for Ron Paul. The way things are going, we're going to have two sub-standard money bombs. Wouldn't you agree that if both dates are so close together, they should be merged? I argue the case that July 19th has made the most impact with people so far. It's made the most progress, so instead of starting from scratch with the 4th, we should all just get behind the 19th. I don't say this to discount all the work you've done for the 4th so far. I appreciate that work and thank you for it, but we need to come together and do this for Ron Paul. I hope you look past your grudge with RonPaulForums, because what's going on with this date really has nothing to do with that issue. It's something much larger."
 
Email Debbie Hopper (debh at ronpaul2012.com).

FWIW, I haven't read any of the moneybomb discussion threads and don't have an opinion on this myself, but is it possible the campaign would prefer to get another cash infusion before July 19?

I'd also like to state that my knowledge of this whole thing is pretty limited but how about a moneybomb at the end of this month to maximize the quarter instead of the 4th of July? That'll offer some more breathing space until 19th July.

Read my post again. I said that you can promote it and donate to it if you want to. The problem comes when the campaign gets behind it. Then it goes from spontaneous to official, forcing us to stop our promotion of July 19th and switch gears toward promoting July 4th. When that happens, July 19th loses the momentum it was building, resulting in two sub-par money bombs. Ensuring the campaign doesn't endorse July 4th means our full focus will be on promoting July 19th.

I agree, I personally don't like so many moneybombs at very short intervals, it significantly hampers the whole point of having them in the first place but to be honest I don't know if we should obsess so much over it or just be happy with whatever that comes in smaller quantities.
 
Last edited:
I agree, I personally don't like so many moneybombs at very short intervals, it significantly hampers the whole point of having them in the first place but to be honest I don't know if we should obsess so much over it or just be happy with whatever that comes in smaller quantities.

I don't agree. The whole point of the moneybombs is to build momentum that leads to all kinds of people donating way more than they ever would have before and some even donating that had never planned to at all. In the past, some people donated who hardly knew Dr. Paul, but got caught up in the excitement. If we cannot build that momentum, then there really is no purpose for even doing moneybombs any longer.

And for the record, it's fairly well known amongst the people who were around during the last campaign, that just throwing in an intermediate moneybomb can have devastating effects on the moneybomb close to it. We saw that last time when the unilateral decision was made to toss in another MB right before what was building to be a huge Tea Party moneybomb. When that additional MB was tossed in, the excitement that had been building for the Tea Party moneybomb went completely flat. Sure, we still raised a great deal of money, but man, imagine what we could have done. It was a very costly incident.
 
I'm going to work and won't be back until around 9:00 PM EST. Hopefully somebody else takes up the lead on this. As a note, I also contacted Michael Nystrom of The Daily Paul about removing the 4th from their calendar.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree. The whole point of the moneybombs is to build momentum that leads to all kinds of people donating way more than they ever would have before and some even donating that had never planned to at all. In the past, some people donated who hardly knew Dr. Paul, but got caught up in the excitement. If we cannot build that momentum, then there really is no purpose for even doing moneybombs any longer.

And for the record, it's fairly well known amongst the people who were around during the last campaign, that just throwing in an intermediate moneybomb can have devastating effects on the moneybomb close to it. We saw that last time when the unilateral decision was made to toss in another MB right before what was building to be a huge Tea Party moneybomb. When that additional MB was tossed in, the excitement that had been building for the Tea Party moneybomb went completely flat. Sure, we still raised a great deal of money, but man, imagine what we could have done. It was a very costly incident.
Money bombs are a great example of central planning in action. Imagine if we let the IRS decide how much of our annual income we can deduct in the form of donations within a particular time frame, say a year rather than a day.
 
Money bombs are a great example of central planning in action. Imagine if we let the IRS decide how much of our annual income we can deduct in the form of donations within a particular time frame, say a year rather than a day.

Actually, they are an example of the free market at work, Jim.
 
Back
Top