How Genetically-Modified Crops Can Save Hundreds Of Thousands From Malnutrition

Olaf

Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
107
Despite the rapid progress made towards reducing poverty in many developing countries in recent years, high rates of malnutrition persist – and Vitamin A deficiency remains a persistent challenge. One cause for optimism is that new approaches to ‘biofortification’ are beginning to offer hope of improved strategies with the potential to save tens to hundreds of thousands of lives per year.

To recap, the problem, as described by the World Health Organisation:


“Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and increases the risk of disease and death from severe infections. In pregnant women VAD causes night blindness and may increase the risk of maternal mortality.

An estimated 250 million preschool children are vitamin A deficient and it is likely that in vitamin A deficient areas a substantial proportion of pregnant women [are] vitamin A deficient. An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 vitamin A-deficient children become blind every year, half of them dying within 12 months of losing their sight.”

These numbers are striking, and show beyond doubt that tackling this problem urgently is surely one of our greatest moral challenges. With a quarter to half a million children going blind each year from vitamin A deficiency, and half of them dying within 12 months, this implies an annnual death toll of 125,000 to 250,000 children – a staggering mortality rate for this little-known affliction.

So what strategies might work?

Continue reading: http://thebreakthrough.org/index.ph...-save-hundreds-of-thousands-from-malnutrition
 
Last edited:
Lack of evidence to prove GMO safety – new peer-reviewed study

81% of approved GMOs not studied for detailed health effects

A group of researchers set out to see how much evidence there is for the safety of crops containing the most common GM genes – for insect resistance and herbicide tolerance – for animals that eat them. They focused on histopathological investigations of the digestive tract in rats, since this would be the main target organ of any new toxic proteins produced by the GM process.

The researchers found that of 47 crop varieties approved by government regulators for animal or human consumption, there were peer-reviewed published studies for only 9. They could find no studies whatsoever for the other 38 approved varieties. This means that they could not find any published histopathology studies for 81% of approved GM crop varieties. What is more, the studies that were carried out were poorly conducted or reported.

The researchers concluded, "There is a lack of evidence to prove that these crop varieties are safe to eat."

The study is a useful antidote to the recent review by former Monsanto scientist Alison Van Eenennaam, which claimed to show that over 100 billion animals had eaten GM feed with no ill effects.
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2014/15669
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2014/15689



Continued...
 
There are absolutely no peer-reviewed studies proving that GM crops are hazardous to human health despite more than two decades of studies.

Aren't all the climate change studies that say we're destroying the planet peer reviewed? Well, the science is settled so I guess that means if it's peer reviewed it's unassailable fact.
 
Seems to me that governments around the world are unified in working overtime to greatly increase poverty, inflicting the malady of subjugation across all lands and upon all populaces.
 
There are absolutely no peer-reviewed studies proving that GM crops are hazardous to human health despite more than two decades of studies.

Say weren't the Salem Witch Trials also peer-reviewed; and the Inquisition's heresy trail of Galileo peer-reviewed; and the trail of Socrates peer-reviewed? ...Well then so much for peer-reviews, eh?

Peer-review is no better than peer-pressure.
 
Sheer propaganda. There is absolutely no independent studies (without conflicts of interest) proving these frankenfoods will save the world.

f

Wow - so much wrong in so few words. Never ceases to amaze me. There are literally over a thousand independent studies proving that GMO crops are safe and more efficient than traditional crops. And on fact, there are NONE that say otherwise.

Conflicts of interest do not invalidate a study. Being unable to duplicate the results invalidates studies.

Nobody ever said that GMO crops will save the world. It's just a weapon in the arsenal.
 
Aren't all the climate change studies that say we're destroying the planet peer reviewed? Well, the science is settled so I guess that means if it's peer reviewed it's unassailable fact.

What does global warming have to do with GMO crops?
 
Lack of evidence to prove GMO safety – new peer-reviewed study

Thick as a brick, she is. It is not scientifically possible to prove that ANYTHING is safe. She has been told this over and over and over.
 
Funny how in one thread angela agrees with scientists who say vitmain A is essential for good eye health, but in another thread when Alex Jones says it, it's only for self gain.

Speaking of self-gain, how much is AJ charging for his magic Vitamin A elixir?

What does that have to do with GMO crops?
 
Last edited:
Thick as a brick, she is. It is not scientifically possible to prove that ANYTHING is safe. She has been told this over and over and over.

And why on Earth do keep playing with your vile deck of semantics? Science is about the inductive substantiation or refutation of continuously evolving hypotheses. For some sunlight results in sunburn and others a suntan, and for some peanuts are a source of nutrition, while for others may result in sickness or death.

Moreover, see: argument from ignorance; evidence of absence, e.g: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
 
Speaking of self-gain, how much is AJ charging for his magic Vitamin A elixir?

What does that have to do with GMO crops?

lol, I don't think AJ is making billions of dollars off his supplements like they are planning to do with this... it's amazing you can't see the hypocrisy.

They are genetically modifying the crops to add one of the main ingredients in Alex Jones' eye supplement to help prevent blindness in children. I don't know what the GMO route for this entails or how safe it is, but I am at least skeptical. I'm not 100% opposed to GMO just as I'm not 100% opposed to vaccines. I'm just skeptical of the vaccine manufacturers and the corporations currently engaged in GMO research and production because they have such strong ties to the government and have both screwed a lot of people over and engaged in questionable and fraudulent research.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top