Harper's Magazine: The Awakening - Ron Paul's Generational Movement

[sailingaway]

Who's that, Sailing?

Amanda White. She was very active on twitter and elsewhere during the campaign. She just moved to join the Free State.

 

[sailingaway]

Here is her twitter profile: https://twitter.com/search?q=@ooooo_aahhh &src=typd

 

[sailingaway]

Sunday night bump

 

[dusman]

hey great find man. I tried googling some text to find the whole article but no wonder search came up empty, its in a pdf file.

Moved these posts from the existing thread in Rand's forum and made into new thread in Ron's forum.

Random reply... you can search Google for JUST PDFs (or any file type) by searing like...

The Awakening: Ron Paul's Generational Movement filetype.pdf

Pretty cool search method that I use all the time.

 

[Koz]

Interesting article. The only thing is that the author clearly has no clue what isolationism means. Other than that, a pretty reasonable article.

 

[goRPaul]

Great article

I've been away from the forums for a long time. I've been paying attention to Rand, but I really gave up on Ron after the media blacked him out after the 2nd place Ames Straw Poll finish that I worked nearly two months on. I've sinced joined the Marine Corps where even though plenty of people like Ron Paul, it is very rare to find a Paulite. This article was great to remember the spirit of rEVOLutionaries and the movements' classic moments. It is well written, very personal, and brought me a sense of closure when I finished it. At 26, I'm feeling a lifetime older than when I joined the movement at the age of 20.

I'm optimistic about and extremely excited by what Rand has been doing and what the movement's future has to offer. In every sense, this movement has only just begun.

 

[sailingaway]

bump for those who didn't see a great article!

 

[scottditzen]

bump for those who didn't see a great article!

Thanks this was a tremendous article and it really made my day.

 

[PierzStyx]

Interesting article. The only thing is that the author clearly has no clue what isolationism means. Other than that, a pretty reasonable article.

This was my only real complaint about the article as well.