Google censors the world

Firestarter

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
5,272
I’m getting sick of tired not only of seeing my postings removed from the internet, but also having my threads simply removed from the search results from Google and Yahoo.
In a world where the media print only lies, it shouldn’t be surprising that the main objective of Google and Yahoo is to hide the truth.

The chairman of Google Inc Eric Schmidt is both a member of Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Schmidt is also CEO of Alphabet Inc. (previously known as Google Ideas).
Jared Cohen is another member of the CFR. Cohen is founder and president of Jigsaw, part of Alphabet Inc. Cohen is also advisor to Eric Schmidt. From 2006 to 2010 Cohen served as a member of the secretary of state's Policy Planning Staff and was a close advisor to Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton.
Ruth Porat is on the board of directors of the CFR and Chief Financial Officer of both Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.
Eric Schmidt attended several meetings of the Bilderberg Group. In 2015 also Regina Dugan and Demis Hassabis of Google joined the Bilderberg meeting.

In December 2015 Eric Schmidt explained that Google must censor hate speech, by using spelling checkers (to combat “terrorism”).
Eris Schmidt wrote in an opinion piece for the New York Times
It's our responsibility to demonstrate that stability and free expression go hand in hand
(...)
Without this type of leadership from government, from citizens, from tech companies, the Internet could become a vehicle for further disaggregation of poorly built societies, and the empowerment of the wrong people, and the wrong voices
”.
In other words speech is only “free” if it doesn’t wake up the sheeple. And we wouldn’t want the have-nots empowered by using technology, would we?

Barack Obama added:
as the internet erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by terrorists to poison the minds of people”.
According to Hillary Clinton tech companies need to “deny online space” to terror groups, that
are using websites, social media, chat rooms and other platforms to celebrate beheadings, recruit future terrorists and call for attacks. We should work with host companies to shut them down”.
Not only Google, but also Facebook and Twitter remove contents: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...check-terrorism-needed-says-Eric-Schmidt.html


Maybe I should ask Google and the government which speech is allowed. But I already know: telling the truth is a capital crime.
I have to admit that I think that censorship protects the terrorists in charge.

What kind of strategies does Google use to hide the truth?
In 2012 Google acknowledged that each day it adds about 9500 new websites to its quarantine list (that won’t show in the search results, removed from the index). Google blocks at the very least millions of websites.
Certain (fake) news sources get blacklisted for promoting a political, religious or moral agenda that the Google censors disapprove of.
The autocomplete blacklist can be used to not complete key words that the censors don’t want us to find.

Google lets the government flag “inappropriate” videos at YouTube (part of Google Inc), so Google can remove them.
Google can stop providing services (for example Gmail) without explanation: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/arti...iggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated
 
Last edited:
Wimps and windbags.


Content Policies

Our content policies apply to your Product's content, including any ads it shows to users and any user-generated content it hosts or links to. Further, they apply to any content from your developer account that is publicly displayed in Chrome Web Store, including your developer name and the landing page of your listed developer website. Products that include content that may not be suitable for all ages should be marked "Mature" on the Developer Dashboard.

Sexually Explicit Material: We don't allow content that contains nudity, graphic sex acts, or sexually explicit material. We also don't allow content that drives traffic to commercial pornography sites. Google has a zero-tolerance policy against child pornography. If we become aware of content with child pornography, we will report it to the appropriate authorities and delete the Google Accounts of those involved with the distribution. Violent or Bullying Behavior: Depictions of gratuitous violence are not allowed. Apps should not contain materials that threaten, harass, or bully other users.

Hate Speech: We don't allow content advocating against groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity.

Impersonation or Deceptive Behavior: Don't pretend to be someone else, and don't represent that your app is authorized by or produced by another company or organization if that is not the case. Products or the ads they contain also must not mimic functionality or warnings from a user's operating system or browser. Products must not contain false or misleading information in any content, title, icon, description, or screenshots. Developers should not divert users or provide links to any other site that mimics Chrome Web Store or passes itself off as Chrome Web Store. Don't misrepresent the functionality of your app or include non-obvious functionality that doesn't serve the primary purpose of the app without clear notification to the user. If your app has a blank description field and appears to be suspicious, we may remove it. Intellectual Property: Don't infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, including patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, and other proprietary rights. We will respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement. For more information or to file a DMCA request, use this tool.

Illegal Activities: Keep it legal. Don't engage in unlawful activities in your Product, such as the sale of prescription drugs without a prescription.

Gambling:
We don't allow content or services that facilitate online gambling, including but not limited to online casinos, sports betting, lotteries, or games of skill that offer prizes of cash or other value.


Malicious Products: Don't transmit viruses, worms, defects, Trojan horses, malware, or any other items of a destructive nature. We don't allow content that harms or interferes with the operation of the networks, servers, or other infrastructure of Google or any third-parties. Spyware, malicious scripts, and password phishing scams are also prohibited in the Chrome Web Store. Where possible, make as much of your code visible in the package as you can. If some of your app's logic is hidden and it appears to be suspicious, we may remove it. Prohibited Products: We don't allow products or services that facilitate unauthorized access to content on websites, such as circumventing paywalls or login restrictions. We also don't allow products or services that encourage, facilitate, or enable the unauthorized access, download, or streaming of copyrighted content or media.


https://developer.chrome.com/webstore/program_policies
 
But you need a full understanding of doublethink, to know that a policy like this protects the criminals in charge.
In our world that's upside down, the big terrorists/corporate criminals keep human rights activists chained, by policies like this.
 
google-monitor-crossouts-ars-thumb-640xauto-20938.jpg
 
Google has created in essence an Information Bubble.

As a result, anything outside of this Information Bubble truly does not exist to the average mind. "Google / YouTube or it didnt happen" is sadly becoming a reality. The Bubbles that Google casts can be far more effective than any MSM Propaganda is it is customized to each individual, both telling people what would motivate them to accept Google as their Overlords overseeing the Monopoly of Belief, and by Lying By Exclusion, a tactic previously reserved only for the MSM, yet, far more effective when tailored to manipulate individual behavior with targetting and algorithms.
 
Google has created in essence an Information Bubble.

As a result, anything outside of this Information Bubble truly does not exist to the average mind. "Google / YouTube or it didnt happen" is sadly becoming a reality. The Bubbles that Google casts can be far more effective than any MSM Propaganda is it is customized to each individual, both telling people what would motivate them to accept Google as their Overlords overseeing the Monopoly of Belief, and by Lying By Exclusion, a tactic previously reserved only for the MSM, yet, far more effective when tailored to manipulate individual behavior with targetting and algorithms.

People are going to use the tools that give them what they want. Find or build an alternative that does a better job of it and they will use that instead. It wasn't so long ago that people's idea of the internet didn't go beyond the AOL or MSN home page.
 
People are going to use the tools that give them what they want. Find or build an alternative that does a better job of it and they will use that instead. It wasn't so long ago that people's idea of the internet didn't go beyond the AOL or MSN home page.

Exactly why Shakey posted a link to Duck Duck Go as a search engine alternative to Google. Better solutions are out there but most people just accept default anything, Google, Laws, Tyranny, Taxation, Jail, Politicians, etc.
 
Google sucks. CIA front.

CIA Funded Google and Facebook Shouldn't Persecute Alex Jones and NaturalNews.com


Via The Daily Bell
Google isn't a state. It's not a service. It's a private company. They can censor whatever they want. Use a different company. If they want to cut off 1000's of people from their services, that's fine. They are free to do so ... This is capitalism, Google isn't a right. Facebook and Twitter are not free speech. They are private companies. - 4Chan
Google really isn't a private company. If it continues to attack alternative media like Alex Jones and NaturalNews.com, it may find lawsuits headed in its direction. The same may go for Facebook too.

By portraying itself as a private company, Google can do as it chooses, when attacking companies that don't live up to its standards from an advertising point of view.

It can help cut off companies that don't properly advertise according to the Google rule book. The rule book is general and vague. But Google is supposedly a private company so it really doesn't matter. Google can do pretty much as it wants. And so can Facebook.

Yet there is plenty to rebut this perspective. The best or most comprehensive article on Google along with the CIA and Pentagon is an Insurge Intelligence article entitled, How the CIA Made Google.

It shows that one of the founders of Google, Sergey Brin virtually reported to the Pentagon/ CIA while developing the project that would eventually become Google. Interestingly, later in the article, people close to the CIA and Pentagon are quoted as denying a close relationship. So obviously there is a good deal of sensitivity around the topic.

When it comes to Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg was funded indirectly by the CIA via Peter Thiel. Thiel is a cofounder of PayPal with Elon Musk of Tesla fame.

Thiel invested $500,000 into Facebook but supposedly this was a CIA investment. Thiel is very close to the CIA. His company Palanitir, supposedly worth some $20 billion, runs secret algorithms for the CIA and other intel agencies. It was just the subject of a Daily Mail story here. Thiel is supposedly a libertarian but we don't see how he can be.

Later, Thiel invested 12.7 million in Facebook. Companies that owe their existence and direction to public intelligence agencies are not private. They ought not to be run as they were.

Facebook has not yet launched an overwhelming assault on Alex Jones or Natural.News but with its determination to root out "fake" news it will surely be part of a large attack at some point. Google has not made a special attack on Alex Jones but it too is headed in that direction.

There are even large issues surrounding Facebook and Google and their determination to harass firms in alternative news community. Like all large companies, they have taken advantage of intellectual property rights, corporate personhood, central banking and regulations - the more the better.

Regulations are helpful to large companies because large companies can follow them more closely than smaller ones. Over time, regulations can put smaller companies out of business. Meanwhile, Central bank fiat money is available in copious quantities to large companies like Facebook and Google.

Corporate personhood blames the company rather than the executive for problems. Thus in the case of any difficulties the company can receive a fine, but the corporate executive may escape untouched.

Intellectual property rights are the final and perhaps most important area when it comes to court decisions that have artificially expanded the might and size of corporations. Both Google and Facebook are built on intellectual property rights paid for by others.

Intellectual property rights expanded drastically post civil war. Before the war there were very few corporations but after the war, the Supreme Court handed down decisions that buttressed both corporate personhood and intellectual property rights.

More recently the Court has attacked intellectual property rights, but the basics remain pretty much untouched. Inventors are given a right to "own" their products for a long fixed period of time. This is fundamental to the wealth creation of Google and Facebook.

It shouldn't be this way. Just because you have invented something doesn't mean you own it for 20 or 30 years. Or if you do own it, you should protect it with your own money, not with taxpayer dollars.

Additionally, if something is not produced but is an idea, that idea is shared immediately on publication. That's our perspective anyway. There's no reason why the Supreme Court should protect an idea. If someone else uses the idea, he has not directly damaged you. The idea has been made available.

Without various investments and relationships, and most importantly without intellectual property rights, corporate personhood, central banking and regulations, both Google and Facebook would be a shadow of what they are now. There would be many more such companies and a good deal more progress would have been made as well.

Conclusion: Corporations are fictitious entities created basically by Supreme Court decisions. They shouldn't exist as they do, and one day perhaps they won't.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...ate-and-shouldnt-do-they-please-alex-jones-an
 

They drew the dude on the outside of the screen. If you are looking from this perspective then he either needs to block the text, or undo the mirror effect so he can be drawing from the inside. I know it's just my OCD but the artist totally let me down here lol.

This puts the dude in the right place:

MreNr6n.png
 
I owe you rep.

sob.jpg


They drew the dude on the outside of the screen. If you are looking from this perspective then he either needs to block the text, or undo the mirror effect so he can be drawing from the inside. I know it's just my OCD but the artist totally let me down here lol.

This puts the dude in the right place:

MreNr6n.png
 
This really brings it full circle.

After reading this ridiculous story from Natural News (coming straight out of the propaganda kitchen of Alex Jones); on February 25 I started threads on Davidicke.com and Letsroll about Letsrollforums.com (and my own threads in particular) removed from the Google and Yahoo search results: http://letsrollforums.com//google-and-yahoo-block-t32181.html

After starting this thread on Ronpaulforums.com (and similar posts on Davidicke and Letsrollforums), the Natural News disinformation Ranger posted an article with the same keywords to bury my story the same day (February 28): http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-...al-news-statement-from-the-health-ranger.html

Most of the Davidicke.com forum is still missing from the internet.
That is not some small forum; it boasts “Most users ever online was 30,561”.
 
On March 2 the David Icke Forum (DIF) made the following Global announcement:
In line with our on-going forum improvements:
From today the forum boards shall be geared more towards our membership.
To Clarify; No changes are being made to the layout of the forum boards. No forums are being closed/deleted. The only change members will experience is that account log-in shall be required to gain full access of forum boards.
The exceptions to login access are: Todays News, General, Exposing child abuse, David
Icke:Research & Media (including sub forums within each category) These forums shall always remain public" - https://forum.davidicke.com/announcement.php?f=4&a=44

Stupid me to think that “forum improvements” are just another newspeak word for censorship…
 
Last edited:
The popular thing to say will never need to be afforded the protections of the First Amendment. The First Amendment exists to protect the Unpopular things to say, because that is where real solutions to our problems exist.
 
Back
Top